Dirasah Muqaranah ‘an Hukm al-Zawaj Bayna Rudha’a Alban Bunuk al-Laban Fi Manzhur Fuqaha al-Aqdamin wa al-Mu’ashirin

Khoirul Amru Harahap, Muhammad Toha Umar
{"title":"Dirasah Muqaranah ‘an Hukm al-Zawaj Bayna Rudha’a Alban Bunuk al-Laban Fi Manzhur Fuqaha al-Aqdamin wa al-Mu’ashirin","authors":"Khoirul Amru Harahap, Muhammad Toha Umar","doi":"10.24090/el-aqwal.v3i1.10562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of Breast Milk Bank is a contemporary fiqh issue, and its ruling is not found in classical fiqh. However, classical Moslem scholars have studied the issue of radha in an unusual way known as al-major (breast milk put into the baby's mouth), al-south (breast milk put through the nose), and or putting breast milk into the baby's mouth using bottles and cups. Therefore, the fuqaha differed on the prohibition of marriage because of radha' unusually or indirectly such as radha' from a breast milk bank. After conducting a comparative analysis, the author concludes that the majority of classical scholars from the Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i and Hambali madhhabs, and most contemporary fiqh scholars, think that indirect radha', such as radha' from a breast milk bank, makes marriage prohibited. They reason that indirect radha' has the same effect as direct radha' regarding the growth of the baby's flesh and bones. Meanwhile, the Zhahiri school of classical jurisprudence and some contemporary jurisprudence scholars such as Yusuf al-Qardhawi think that indirect radha' such as radha' from a breast milk bank is not called radha'. According to them, radha' is only if the baby suckles directly on the mother's nipple. Hence, they think that radha' from a breast milk bank does not lead to the prohibition of marriage.","PeriodicalId":418937,"journal":{"name":"El-Aqwal : Journal of Sharia and Comparative Law","volume":"35 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"El-Aqwal : Journal of Sharia and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24090/el-aqwal.v3i1.10562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The issue of Breast Milk Bank is a contemporary fiqh issue, and its ruling is not found in classical fiqh. However, classical Moslem scholars have studied the issue of radha in an unusual way known as al-major (breast milk put into the baby's mouth), al-south (breast milk put through the nose), and or putting breast milk into the baby's mouth using bottles and cups. Therefore, the fuqaha differed on the prohibition of marriage because of radha' unusually or indirectly such as radha' from a breast milk bank. After conducting a comparative analysis, the author concludes that the majority of classical scholars from the Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i and Hambali madhhabs, and most contemporary fiqh scholars, think that indirect radha', such as radha' from a breast milk bank, makes marriage prohibited. They reason that indirect radha' has the same effect as direct radha' regarding the growth of the baby's flesh and bones. Meanwhile, the Zhahiri school of classical jurisprudence and some contemporary jurisprudence scholars such as Yusuf al-Qardhawi think that indirect radha' such as radha' from a breast milk bank is not called radha'. According to them, radha' is only if the baby suckles directly on the mother's nipple. Hence, they think that radha' from a breast milk bank does not lead to the prohibition of marriage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dirasah Muqaranah 'an Hukm al-Zawaj Bayna Rudha'a Alban Bunuk al-Laban Fi Manzhur Fuqaha al-Aqdamin wa al-Mu'ashirin
母乳库问题是一个当代教法问题,古典教法中没有关于它的规定。然而,古典穆斯林学者研究了以一种被称为 al-major(将母乳放入婴儿口中)、al-south(通过鼻子将母乳放入婴儿口中)或使用奶瓶和杯子将母乳放入婴儿口中的不寻常方式进行母乳喂养的问题。因此,各教法学派在禁止因非正常或间接(如母乳库中的母乳)而结婚的问题上存在分歧。在进行比较分析后,作者得出结论:来自哈乃斐、马利基、沙斐仪和汉巴利教派的大多数经典学者以及大多数当代教法学者都认为,间接 "拉达"(如母乳库中的 "拉达")禁止结婚。他们的理由是,间接 "拉达 "与直接 "拉达 "对婴儿骨肉生长的影响相同。同时,古典法学的宰希里学派和一些当代法学学者,如优素福-卡达维(Yusuf al-Qardhawi)认为,间接 "拉达",如母乳库中的 "拉达",不被称为 "拉达"。根据他们的观点,只有婴儿直接吮吸母亲的乳头才是 "母乳喂养"。因此,他们认为母乳库中的 "拉达 "不会导致禁止结婚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevention Strategies for the Crime of Adultery in the Light of Islamic Law Dirasah Muqaranah ‘an Hukm al-Zawaj Bayna Rudha’a Alban Bunuk al-Laban Fi Manzhur Fuqaha al-Aqdamin wa al-Mu’ashirin Marital Property in Marriages of Different Nationalities in Indonesia According to National Law and Islamic Law The Dynamics of Polygamy and Divorce in Muslim Countries Marital Rape in Indonesia in Maqashid Shari’ah Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1