Architects in Europe: Models of Professionalisation and Potential Implications for the Planning Profession

H. Mieg, H. Oevermann
{"title":"Architects in Europe: Models of Professionalisation and Potential Implications for the Planning Profession","authors":"H. Mieg, H. Oevermann","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2021.1945817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Data from the Architects’ Council of Europe (ACE) show a very inhomogeneous distribution of architects among European countries, for example, high numbers of architects in Italy and Germany versus low numbers in the UK and France. These discrepancies cannot be explained by differences in the domestic construction markets. This paper reviews models of professionalisation to explain the heterogeneity among European architects and shows potential implications for the planning profession in Europe. We analyse the 2018 ACE data for the five European countries with the strongest labour markets for architects. Our findings led to three main conclusions: Firstly, such models of professionalisation add to an understanding of statistical data on architects in Europe. Secondly, a better understanding of the statistical data requires more than a single theory. Thirdly, as to the planning profession, the standard process model of professionalisation may work well for the UK, but not for the other European countries.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"disP - The Planning Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2021.1945817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Data from the Architects’ Council of Europe (ACE) show a very inhomogeneous distribution of architects among European countries, for example, high numbers of architects in Italy and Germany versus low numbers in the UK and France. These discrepancies cannot be explained by differences in the domestic construction markets. This paper reviews models of professionalisation to explain the heterogeneity among European architects and shows potential implications for the planning profession in Europe. We analyse the 2018 ACE data for the five European countries with the strongest labour markets for architects. Our findings led to three main conclusions: Firstly, such models of professionalisation add to an understanding of statistical data on architects in Europe. Secondly, a better understanding of the statistical data requires more than a single theory. Thirdly, as to the planning profession, the standard process model of professionalisation may work well for the UK, but not for the other European countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲建筑师:专业化模式及其对规划专业的潜在影响
来自欧洲建筑师委员会(ACE)的数据显示,欧洲国家建筑师的分布极不均匀,例如,意大利和德国的建筑师数量较多,而英国和法国的建筑师数量较少。这些差异不能用国内建筑市场的差异来解释。本文回顾了专业化模型,以解释欧洲建筑师之间的异质性,并展示了对欧洲规划专业的潜在影响。我们分析了2018年五个拥有最强建筑师劳动力市场的欧洲国家的ACE数据。我们的研究结果得出了三个主要结论:首先,这种专业化模型增加了对欧洲建筑师统计数据的理解。其次,更好地理解统计数据需要的不仅仅是一种理论。第三,就规划行业而言,专业化的标准流程模式可能适用于英国,但不适用于其他欧洲国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Karl Ganser. Integratives Planen und Handeln Leadership – collectively oriented: Insights from trajectories of temporary urbanism Die Bereitstellung von leistbarem Wohnraum in Zeiten der Wohnkrise Breaking out of the box – towards functional spatial planning Bucharest – the role of spatial planning in a challenging urban environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1