Online Political Advertising in the United States

E. Fowler, Michael M. Franz, Travis N. Ridout
{"title":"Online Political Advertising in the United States","authors":"E. Fowler, Michael M. Franz, Travis N. Ridout","doi":"10.1017/9781108890960.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital political advertising comes inmany forms, appears in amyriad of places, and can be targeted in many more ways than traditional television advertising. At its most basic, digital political advertising is interactive content placed for a fee. It includes display advertising (images, audio, or video) and search advertising (based on keyword search behavior); the goal may be to build supporter distribution lists, to fundraise for a candidate, party, or specific political cause, to persuade, or to increase name recognition and distribute information. Paid political ads can appear as banners (across the top of the page), as page takeovers, on the side of a webpage or news feed, in mobile apps, or in social media feeds where viewers can interact, like, or share them, further disseminating paid content organically. Some online ads feature call-to-action buttons and some auto-play as pre-roll advertising, appearing before consumers can continue their online activity. Some can be skipped and others will not allow further action until the ad finishes playing. According to Borrell Associates, digital advertising made up a small fraction (less than 1 percent, $71million) of political ad spending in the United States in 2014 but was projected to comprise a fifth of spending (20.1 percent, $1.8 billion) in 2018 (Borrell Associates 2018). Although digital advertising in campaigns has been around for a while and has been a growth market for several cycles now, it has long been overlooked by scholars, especially in comparison to traditional television advertising, for which there is a long and robust literature (see Fowler, Franz, and Ridout 2016), and even organic social media content, for which there is burgeoning research (Borah 2016; Bode et al. 2016). The lack of research on paid online advertising stems, in large part, from the difficulty in tracking the placement of and spending on online ads on websites, in apps, and on social media. Unlike television, where commercial tracking data has been available for two decades, systematic commercial tracking of digital advertising is very new, and until the aftermath of the 2016","PeriodicalId":378598,"journal":{"name":"Social Media and Democracy","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Media and Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108890960.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Digital political advertising comes inmany forms, appears in amyriad of places, and can be targeted in many more ways than traditional television advertising. At its most basic, digital political advertising is interactive content placed for a fee. It includes display advertising (images, audio, or video) and search advertising (based on keyword search behavior); the goal may be to build supporter distribution lists, to fundraise for a candidate, party, or specific political cause, to persuade, or to increase name recognition and distribute information. Paid political ads can appear as banners (across the top of the page), as page takeovers, on the side of a webpage or news feed, in mobile apps, or in social media feeds where viewers can interact, like, or share them, further disseminating paid content organically. Some online ads feature call-to-action buttons and some auto-play as pre-roll advertising, appearing before consumers can continue their online activity. Some can be skipped and others will not allow further action until the ad finishes playing. According to Borrell Associates, digital advertising made up a small fraction (less than 1 percent, $71million) of political ad spending in the United States in 2014 but was projected to comprise a fifth of spending (20.1 percent, $1.8 billion) in 2018 (Borrell Associates 2018). Although digital advertising in campaigns has been around for a while and has been a growth market for several cycles now, it has long been overlooked by scholars, especially in comparison to traditional television advertising, for which there is a long and robust literature (see Fowler, Franz, and Ridout 2016), and even organic social media content, for which there is burgeoning research (Borah 2016; Bode et al. 2016). The lack of research on paid online advertising stems, in large part, from the difficulty in tracking the placement of and spending on online ads on websites, in apps, and on social media. Unlike television, where commercial tracking data has been available for two decades, systematic commercial tracking of digital advertising is very new, and until the aftermath of the 2016
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国的网络政治广告
数字政治广告有多种形式,出现在无数的地方,比传统的电视广告有更多的针对性。最基本的是,数字政治广告是付费投放的互动内容。它包括展示广告(图像、音频或视频)和搜索广告(基于关键字搜索行为);目标可能是建立支持者分布名单,为候选人、政党或特定的政治事业筹集资金,说服或提高知名度和传播信息。付费政治广告可以以横幅(在页面顶部)的形式出现,也可以作为页面接管,出现在网页或新闻动态的侧面,出现在移动应用程序中,或者出现在社交媒体动态中,浏览者可以与之互动、点赞或分享,从而进一步有机地传播付费内容。一些在线广告以号召按钮和一些自动播放的广告为特色,在消费者继续他们的在线活动之前出现。有些可以跳过,有些则不允许进一步操作,直到广告播放完毕。根据博雷尔协会的数据,2014年,数字广告占美国政治广告支出的一小部分(不到1%,7100万美元),但预计到2018年将占支出的五分之一(20.1%,18亿美元)(博雷尔协会2018年)。尽管竞选活动中的数字广告已经存在了一段时间,并且现在已经成为几个周期的增长市场,但长期以来一直被学者们所忽视,特别是与传统电视广告相比,传统电视广告有悠久而强大的文献(见Fowler, Franz, and Ridout 2016),甚至有机社交媒体内容,也有新兴的研究(Borah 2016;Bode et al. 2016)。在很大程度上,缺乏对付费在线广告的研究,是因为很难追踪在线广告在网站、应用程序和社交媒体上的投放和支出。在电视上,商业跟踪数据已经存在了20年,而数字广告的系统商业跟踪是非常新的,直到2016年大选之后
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Online Hate Speech Bots and Computational Propaganda: Automation for Communication and Control Dealing with Disinformation: Evaluating the Case for Amendment of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act Misinformation, Disinformation, and Online Propaganda Comparative Media Regulation in the United States and Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1