Polytheism and Christian Belief

Michael Rea
{"title":"Polytheism and Christian Belief","authors":"Michael Rea","doi":"10.1093/JTS/FLJ007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Christian philosophers and theologians have long been concerned with the question of how to reconcile their belief in three fully divine Persons with their commitment to monotheism. The most popular strategy for doing this—the social trinitarian strategy—argues that, though the divine Persons are in no sense the same God, monotheism is secured by certain relations that obtain among them. It is argued that if the social trinitarian understanding of the doctrine of the Trinity is correct, then Christianity is not interestingly different from the polytheistic Amun-Re theology of Egypt’s New Kingdom period. Thus, social trinitarianism should be classified as a version of polytheism rather than monotheism.","PeriodicalId":202769,"journal":{"name":"Essays in Analytic Theology","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Essays in Analytic Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JTS/FLJ007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Christian philosophers and theologians have long been concerned with the question of how to reconcile their belief in three fully divine Persons with their commitment to monotheism. The most popular strategy for doing this—the social trinitarian strategy—argues that, though the divine Persons are in no sense the same God, monotheism is secured by certain relations that obtain among them. It is argued that if the social trinitarian understanding of the doctrine of the Trinity is correct, then Christianity is not interestingly different from the polytheistic Amun-Re theology of Egypt’s New Kingdom period. Thus, social trinitarianism should be classified as a version of polytheism rather than monotheism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多神教和基督教信仰
基督教哲学家和神学家长期以来一直关注的问题是如何调和他们对三个完全神圣的人的信仰与他们对一神论的承诺。对此,最流行的策略是社会三位一体论,该策略认为,尽管神的位格在任何意义上都不是同一位神,但一神论是由他们之间的某些关系所保证的。有人认为,如果社会三位一体论对三位一体教义的理解是正确的,那么基督教与埃及新王国时期多神论的阿蒙-雷神学并没有什么有趣的不同。因此,社会三位一体论应该被归类为多神论而不是一神论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relative Identity and the Doctrine of the Trinity Hylomorphism and the Incarnation Wright on Theodicy Sceptical Theism and the ‘Too-Much-Scepticism’ Objection The Ill-Made Knight and the Stain on the Soul
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1