Balancing Freedom of the Press and Reasonable Restrictions in Bangladesh: An Appraisal

E. Haque
{"title":"Balancing Freedom of the Press and Reasonable Restrictions in Bangladesh: An Appraisal","authors":"E. Haque","doi":"10.21272/bel.3(1).80-100.2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the balancing of freedom of the press and reasonable restrictions in Bangladesh under existing national laws and relevant international policy instruments. Across the globe, there is unending debate as to indoctrination of free press and reasonable restrictions. Bangladesh is not an exception to the tussle between these two notions. The free but fair press enables public debates and creates essential checks on government powers. The question of reasonable restrictions on press appears at the forefront of discussion as the press is also engaging in serving self-interest or value loaded vested interests vilifying its objectivity, impartiality, and accuracy. Though, the press and other media outlets of the country are partly free, the ongoing restrictions imposed by statutory laws and self-censorship have plunged the media into a stagnated ditch. However, journalists and media activists are gradually striving to overcome the hurdles of restrictions foreseeing a silver lining. On one hand, the country is globally lauded for its exponential progress in terms of economic, social and international goals and has emerged as an Asian tiger. On the other hand, the country is struggling to uphold the spirit of the free press in nourishing a healthy democracy amid good governance that tolerates diverse, dissent, pluralist views and constructive criticism.","PeriodicalId":410560,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics and Leadership","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics and Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.3(1).80-100.2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article explores the balancing of freedom of the press and reasonable restrictions in Bangladesh under existing national laws and relevant international policy instruments. Across the globe, there is unending debate as to indoctrination of free press and reasonable restrictions. Bangladesh is not an exception to the tussle between these two notions. The free but fair press enables public debates and creates essential checks on government powers. The question of reasonable restrictions on press appears at the forefront of discussion as the press is also engaging in serving self-interest or value loaded vested interests vilifying its objectivity, impartiality, and accuracy. Though, the press and other media outlets of the country are partly free, the ongoing restrictions imposed by statutory laws and self-censorship have plunged the media into a stagnated ditch. However, journalists and media activists are gradually striving to overcome the hurdles of restrictions foreseeing a silver lining. On one hand, the country is globally lauded for its exponential progress in terms of economic, social and international goals and has emerged as an Asian tiger. On the other hand, the country is struggling to uphold the spirit of the free press in nourishing a healthy democracy amid good governance that tolerates diverse, dissent, pluralist views and constructive criticism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平衡孟加拉的新闻自由与合理限制:评鉴
本文探讨孟加拉国在现有国家法律和相关国际政策文书下,如何平衡新闻自由和合理限制。在全球范围内,关于新闻自由的灌输和合理限制的辩论永无止境。在这两个概念之间的争斗中,孟加拉国也不例外。自由而公正的媒体使公众能够进行辩论,并对政府权力进行必要的制衡。媒体的客观性、公正性、准确性受到诋毁,同时也在为自身利益或价值取向的既得利益服务,因此,对媒体的合理限制问题成为讨论的焦点。虽然该国的新闻和其他媒体有部分自由,但成文法和自我审查所施加的持续限制使媒体陷入了停滞的深渊。然而,记者和媒体活动人士正在逐渐努力克服限制的障碍,预见到一线希望。一方面,这个国家因其在经济、社会和国际目标方面的指数进步而受到全球赞誉,并已成为亚洲之虎。另一方面,该国正在努力维护新闻自由的精神,在良好的治理中培育健康的民主,容忍不同意见,多元化观点和建设性批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
To Overcome Ethical Dilemmas in an Organization: Paradox and Ethics of Freedom Can Help A Fair Investment Environment: The Impact of the Shadow Economy, the Harshness of the Courts Against Corrupt Officials, Tax Pressure and Restrictions on Business Cost of Quality Management: Encouraging Business Leaders to Manage and Invest in Quality Enhancement Exploring Leadership and Other Influential Dimensions When Assessing Online Learning Modules Within Higher Education Institutions: Insights From Flow Theory and Two-Factor Principles Corruption and Economic Growth Nexus: Empirical Evidence From Dynamic Threshold Panel Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1