Factors Contributing to Students Engagement: A Case Study at the Institute of Medicine at SUT

Areerat Siripongpan, Theeranit Namkunee, Paramate Horkaew
{"title":"Factors Contributing to Students Engagement: A Case Study at the Institute of Medicine at SUT","authors":"Areerat Siripongpan, Theeranit Namkunee, Paramate Horkaew","doi":"10.55766/avfz5974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"       In higher education, much attention has been focused on the enhancement of the educational experience, allowing students to successfully develop and thus make the most of not only their potential, but also the numerous other benefits education has to offer. Being engaged both institutionally and academically plays a vital part in developing their potential and performance. Therefore, this paper studied the engagement level towards the academics at the Institute of medicine. Factors contributing to institutional engagement were also analyzed. The participants include 229 medical students. Each participant was asked to answer a general demographic questionnaire, the Institute engagement questionnaire, the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale–Student version (UWES-S) questionnaire, and a questionnaire of all relevant factors. Student engagement was assessed through statistical analysis. These included percentage, mean, standard deviation, and stepwise multiple regression of the constituent factors. The Institute engagement level was 3.73. Factors that significantly pertained to the engagement level were teachers (p = 0.01*), staff (p = 0.01*), friends (p = 0.02*), and seniors peers (p = 0.03*), respectively. Academic engagement was found to vary by the level of study. Medical students in their 1st, 2nd, and 3rd years exhibited engagement levels of 4.94, 4.87, and 4.55, respectively. Given the group, students’ engagement toward the university was of a high level. The most important contributing factors were their relationship with teachers, staff, friends, and senior peers. However, the academic engagement level tended to decrease as study progressed. It was conjectured that this notable decrease resulted from increasing complexity in the program as specified by the curriculum. Positively engaged students better adapt to the academic context of higher education. Hence, they are much likely to succeed.","PeriodicalId":145995,"journal":{"name":"Suranaree Journal of Social Science","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suranaree Journal of Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55766/avfz5974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

       In higher education, much attention has been focused on the enhancement of the educational experience, allowing students to successfully develop and thus make the most of not only their potential, but also the numerous other benefits education has to offer. Being engaged both institutionally and academically plays a vital part in developing their potential and performance. Therefore, this paper studied the engagement level towards the academics at the Institute of medicine. Factors contributing to institutional engagement were also analyzed. The participants include 229 medical students. Each participant was asked to answer a general demographic questionnaire, the Institute engagement questionnaire, the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale–Student version (UWES-S) questionnaire, and a questionnaire of all relevant factors. Student engagement was assessed through statistical analysis. These included percentage, mean, standard deviation, and stepwise multiple regression of the constituent factors. The Institute engagement level was 3.73. Factors that significantly pertained to the engagement level were teachers (p = 0.01*), staff (p = 0.01*), friends (p = 0.02*), and seniors peers (p = 0.03*), respectively. Academic engagement was found to vary by the level of study. Medical students in their 1st, 2nd, and 3rd years exhibited engagement levels of 4.94, 4.87, and 4.55, respectively. Given the group, students’ engagement toward the university was of a high level. The most important contributing factors were their relationship with teachers, staff, friends, and senior peers. However, the academic engagement level tended to decrease as study progressed. It was conjectured that this notable decrease resulted from increasing complexity in the program as specified by the curriculum. Positively engaged students better adapt to the academic context of higher education. Hence, they are much likely to succeed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进学生参与的因素:新加坡科技大学医学研究所的案例研究
在高等教育中,很多注意力都集中在提高教育体验上,使学生能够成功地发展,从而不仅充分发挥他们的潜力,而且充分发挥教育所能提供的许多其他好处。在制度上和学术上的参与对发展他们的潜力和表现起着至关重要的作用。因此,本文对医学研究所的学术投入程度进行了研究。对影响机构参与的因素也进行了分析。参与者包括229名医学生。每位参与者被要求回答一份一般人口调查问卷、研究所敬业度问卷、乌得勒支工作敬业度量表-学生版(UWES-S)问卷,以及一份所有相关因素的问卷。通过统计分析评估学生的参与度。这些包括组成因素的百分比、平均值、标准差和逐步多元回归。研究所的参与水平为3.73。教师(p = 0.01*)、教职工(p = 0.01*)、朋友(p = 0.02*)、学长同伴(p = 0.03*)分别对敬业度水平有显著影响。研究发现,学习投入因学习水平而异。医学生一年级、二年级和三年级的敬业度分别为4.94、4.87和4.55。考虑到这个群体,学生们对大学的投入程度很高。最重要的影响因素是他们与老师、员工、朋友和高年级同学的关系。然而,随着学习的进展,学业投入水平有下降的趋势。据推测,这种显著的下降是由于课程规定的程序越来越复杂。积极参与的学生更能适应高等教育的学术环境。因此,他们很有可能成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nietzsche as Metaphysician Structural Equation Modeling of Food Safety Standard in the Cassava Industry in Thailand Implementing a Portfolio-based Learner Autonomy Development Model in an EFL Writing Course Causal Factors Influencing Development of Organizational Survival for Companies Listed in Thailand Intercultural Language Education: Supportive Factors and Constraints on EFL Learners’ Intercultural Communicative Competence Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1