Detecting duplicate examples in behaviour driven development specifications

L. Binamungu, Suzanne M. Embury, Nikolaos Konstantinou
{"title":"Detecting duplicate examples in behaviour driven development specifications","authors":"L. Binamungu, Suzanne M. Embury, Nikolaos Konstantinou","doi":"10.1109/VST.2018.8327149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD), the behaviour of the software to be built is specified as a set of example interactions with the system, expressed using a “Given-When-Then” structure. The examples are written using customer language, and are readable by end-users. They are also executable, and act as tests that determine whether the implementation matches the desired behaviour or not. This approach can be effective in building a common understanding of the requirements, but it can also face problems. When the suites of examples grow large, they can be difficult and expensive to change. Duplication can creep in, and can be challenging to detect manually. Current tools for detecting duplication in code are also not effective for BDD examples. Moreover, human concerns of readability and clarity can rise. We present an approach for detecting duplication in BDD suites that is based around dynamic tracing, and describe an evaluation based on three open source systems.","PeriodicalId":126355,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Workshop on Validation, Analysis and Evolution of Software Tests (VST)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Workshop on Validation, Analysis and Evolution of Software Tests (VST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VST.2018.8327149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

In Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD), the behaviour of the software to be built is specified as a set of example interactions with the system, expressed using a “Given-When-Then” structure. The examples are written using customer language, and are readable by end-users. They are also executable, and act as tests that determine whether the implementation matches the desired behaviour or not. This approach can be effective in building a common understanding of the requirements, but it can also face problems. When the suites of examples grow large, they can be difficult and expensive to change. Duplication can creep in, and can be challenging to detect manually. Current tools for detecting duplication in code are also not effective for BDD examples. Moreover, human concerns of readability and clarity can rise. We present an approach for detecting duplication in BDD suites that is based around dynamic tracing, and describe an evaluation based on three open source systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检测行为驱动开发规范中的重复示例
在行为驱动开发(BDD)中,要构建的软件的行为被指定为与系统的一组示例交互,使用“给定-何时-然后”结构表示。示例使用客户语言编写,最终用户可以阅读。它们也是可执行的,并作为确定实现是否与期望的行为匹配的测试。这种方法可以有效地构建对需求的共同理解,但它也可能面临问题。当示例集变大时,更改它们可能会变得困难和昂贵。复制可能会悄悄出现,并且很难手动检测到。当前用于检测代码重复的工具对BDD示例也不有效。此外,人们对可读性和清晰度的关注也会增加。我们提出了一种基于动态跟踪的方法来检测BDD套件中的重复,并描述了基于三个开源系统的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the efficiency of continuous testing during test-driven development Summarization techniques for code, change, testing, and user feedback (Invited paper) A retrospective of production and test code co-evolution in an industrial project Detecting duplicate examples in behaviour driven development specifications Automated generation of requirements-based test cases for an adaptive cruise control system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1