The Political Economy of Militarism

A. Elveren
{"title":"The Political Economy of Militarism","authors":"A. Elveren","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197527085.013.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High levels of military expenditures are one key aspect of militarism, which is the set of material and ideological manifestations that promote militaristic values in the political, social, and economic domains. This chapter examines the determinants and economic costs of military expenditures with respect to different schools of economic thoughts, including neoclassical, Keynesian, and Marxist. There has been a growing literature on the role of military spending in capitalism in general and its impact on economic growth in particular. As Rosa Luxemburg noted, military power and the ideological influence of militarism were key mechanisms of primitive accumulation in the history of capitalism. That is, capitalism needs non-capitalist systems to expand, and military power makes it possible. Therefore, one key strategic motive of high military spending by core capitalist nations is to sustain the hegemony over peripheral countries and to regulate the rivalry between them. Resting upon this background, the chapter emphasizes three issues about the role of militarism: First, its role in capitalist accumulation and absorption of surplus with special attention to Luxemburg, and Baran and Sweezy; second, the use of militarism to the imperialist interests; and finally, its impact on employment and economic growth.","PeriodicalId":410474,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Economic Imperialism","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Economic Imperialism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197527085.013.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High levels of military expenditures are one key aspect of militarism, which is the set of material and ideological manifestations that promote militaristic values in the political, social, and economic domains. This chapter examines the determinants and economic costs of military expenditures with respect to different schools of economic thoughts, including neoclassical, Keynesian, and Marxist. There has been a growing literature on the role of military spending in capitalism in general and its impact on economic growth in particular. As Rosa Luxemburg noted, military power and the ideological influence of militarism were key mechanisms of primitive accumulation in the history of capitalism. That is, capitalism needs non-capitalist systems to expand, and military power makes it possible. Therefore, one key strategic motive of high military spending by core capitalist nations is to sustain the hegemony over peripheral countries and to regulate the rivalry between them. Resting upon this background, the chapter emphasizes three issues about the role of militarism: First, its role in capitalist accumulation and absorption of surplus with special attention to Luxemburg, and Baran and Sweezy; second, the use of militarism to the imperialist interests; and finally, its impact on employment and economic growth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军国主义的政治经济学
高水平的军费开支是军国主义的一个关键方面,这是在政治、社会和经济领域促进军国主义价值观的一系列物质和意识形态表现。本章考察了军事开支的决定因素和经济成本,涉及不同的经济思想流派,包括新古典主义、凯恩斯主义和马克思主义。关于军费开支在资本主义中的作用,特别是对经济增长的影响的文献越来越多。正如罗莎·卢森堡所指出的,军事力量和军国主义的意识形态影响是资本主义历史上原始积累的关键机制。也就是说,资本主义需要非资本主义制度来扩张,而军事力量使其成为可能。因此,核心资本主义国家高军费开支的一个关键战略动机是维持对周边国家的霸权并调节它们之间的竞争。在此背景下,本章强调了军国主义作用的三个问题:首先,它在资本主义积累和剩余吸收中的作用,并特别关注卢森堡、巴兰和斯威齐;二是利用军国主义为帝国主义谋取利益;最后,它对就业和经济增长的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Power Competition and Exploitation in Southeast Asia Land Grabbing in Southeastern Europe in Historical Context The Clash of Interpretations Asymmetric Interdependence Capitalism, Imperialism, and Crises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1