Comparing the Tasks of Two English Textbooks

Endah Woro Hapsari, Dwi Riyanti, I. Ikhsanudin
{"title":"Comparing the Tasks of Two English Textbooks","authors":"Endah Woro Hapsari, Dwi Riyanti, I. Ikhsanudin","doi":"10.26418/icote.v2i2.38217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to compare two English textbooks on the tenth-grade level. They were official books published by Goverment of Indonesia (GOI) published in 2014 and 2017. Littlejohn’S framework was applied to analyzing the process. The evaluation covers objective description, subjective analysis and subjective inference. Yet, this article focused on objective description and subjective analysis. The result found that there was significant revision in those books. It could be seen on the analysis result. This research analyzed elevent points- place of the learner’s material in any wider set of materials, published form of the learner’s materials, subdivision of the learner’s materials into sections, subdivision of sections into sub-sections, continuity, route, access, aims, principle of selection, pronciple of sequencing and subject matter and focus on subject matter. Based on elevent analyzing point, five of them was revised by the book author. The revision lied on subdivision on learners' materials, a subdivision of section into subsections, and access-publication section. Furthermore, on the design part, the revision lied on the aims and the objectives of books. In addition, the later book has better design than the previous one. The learning objectives are clearly stated on the preface part and it designed through the understandable task instructions.","PeriodicalId":155006,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings International Conference on Teaching and Education (ICoTE)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings International Conference on Teaching and Education (ICoTE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26418/icote.v2i2.38217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to compare two English textbooks on the tenth-grade level. They were official books published by Goverment of Indonesia (GOI) published in 2014 and 2017. Littlejohn’S framework was applied to analyzing the process. The evaluation covers objective description, subjective analysis and subjective inference. Yet, this article focused on objective description and subjective analysis. The result found that there was significant revision in those books. It could be seen on the analysis result. This research analyzed elevent points- place of the learner’s material in any wider set of materials, published form of the learner’s materials, subdivision of the learner’s materials into sections, subdivision of sections into sub-sections, continuity, route, access, aims, principle of selection, pronciple of sequencing and subject matter and focus on subject matter. Based on elevent analyzing point, five of them was revised by the book author. The revision lied on subdivision on learners' materials, a subdivision of section into subsections, and access-publication section. Furthermore, on the design part, the revision lied on the aims and the objectives of books. In addition, the later book has better design than the previous one. The learning objectives are clearly stated on the preface part and it designed through the understandable task instructions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较两种英语教材的任务
这篇文章的目的是比较两本十年级的英语教科书。它们是印度尼西亚政府(GOI)于2014年和2017年出版的官方书籍。利特尔约翰的框架被用于分析这一过程。评价包括客观描述、主观分析和主观推断。然而,本文侧重于客观描述和主观分析。结果发现,这些书有显著的修订。从分析结果可以看出。本研究分析了11个要点——学习者材料在任何更广泛的材料集中的位置,学习者材料的出版形式,学习者材料的细分部分,部分的细分部分,连续性,路径,途径,目标,选择原则,顺序原则和主题以及关注主题。基于11个事件分析点,作者对其中的5个进行了修改。对学习者材料进行细分,将部分细分为子部分,以及访问出版部分。此外,在设计部分,修订的目的和目标的书籍。此外,后一本书的设计比前一本书更好。前言部分明确了学习目标,并通过可理解的任务说明进行设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Content Analysis of Grammar Activities in 'Wider World 2' Student’s Book by Pearson for Grade Seven Students Developing Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) Materials for ESL Learners A Descriptive Study of the Students' Problems in English Reading Comprehension of X grade at SMAS AMKUR Sungai Pinyuh in the Academic year 2021/2022 Evaluation of Cultural Content on English Module of 9th Grade Students Published by Indonesia’s Government during the Covid-19 Pandemic An Analysis of Project Based Learning Application in Curriculum 2013
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1