Re-Inventing Tradition and Decolonizing the Stage: A Study of Girish Karnads Plays

M. Manju, Dr. Nempal Singh
{"title":"Re-Inventing Tradition and Decolonizing the Stage: A Study of Girish Karnads Plays","authors":"M. Manju, Dr. Nempal Singh","doi":"10.22161/ijeel.2.4.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This postmodern blurring of cultural lines has resulted in a universal humanity that can be accessed via a single body of knowledge. The epiphanic moment of confronting the other shifted the focus from Europe to the East, where scholars realized that the epistemic discourse of their own countries reflected the same a priori delimitation of knowledge. The Radhakrishnan Commission, for example, proposed in 1948 that the fields of natural science, social science, and the humanities should study different aspects of reality: facts, events, and values, respectively. In order to dismantle the epistemic dominance of western knowledge and eradicate the homogeneity of discourses, the time has come to highlight, as Bakhtin would have it, the importance of comparative dialogic in establishing cross-cultural dialogic. In a same vein, the Orientalist paradigm has to shift toward a focus on humanistic conversation between South and South and a reconfiguration of the Asian dilemma of singularities. To get a holistic comprehension of human beings, a paradigm shift and rethinking—what Derrida terms Transformed Humanities, New Humanities—is essential.","PeriodicalId":211404,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of English Language, Education and Literature Studies (IJEEL)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of English Language, Education and Literature Studies (IJEEL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22161/ijeel.2.4.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This postmodern blurring of cultural lines has resulted in a universal humanity that can be accessed via a single body of knowledge. The epiphanic moment of confronting the other shifted the focus from Europe to the East, where scholars realized that the epistemic discourse of their own countries reflected the same a priori delimitation of knowledge. The Radhakrishnan Commission, for example, proposed in 1948 that the fields of natural science, social science, and the humanities should study different aspects of reality: facts, events, and values, respectively. In order to dismantle the epistemic dominance of western knowledge and eradicate the homogeneity of discourses, the time has come to highlight, as Bakhtin would have it, the importance of comparative dialogic in establishing cross-cultural dialogic. In a same vein, the Orientalist paradigm has to shift toward a focus on humanistic conversation between South and South and a reconfiguration of the Asian dilemma of singularities. To get a holistic comprehension of human beings, a paradigm shift and rethinking—what Derrida terms Transformed Humanities, New Humanities—is essential.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这种后现代文化界限的模糊导致了一种普遍的人性,可以通过单一的知识体系来获取。面对他者的顿悟时刻将焦点从欧洲转移到了东方,那里的学者意识到,他们自己国家的认识论话语反映了同样先验的知识界限。例如,拉达克里希南委员会(Radhakrishnan Commission)在1948年提出,自然科学、社会科学和人文科学领域应该分别研究现实的不同方面:事实、事件和价值。为了消除西方知识的认识论主导地位,根除话语的同质性,正如巴赫金所说,是时候强调比较对话在建立跨文化对话中的重要性了。同样,东方主义范式必须转向关注南与南之间的人文对话,并重新配置亚洲的奇点困境。为了全面地理解人类,范式的转变和重新思考——德里达称之为“改造的人文学科,新的人文学科”——是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Contextualized Micro-lessons in the Acquisition of College English Vocabulary Learning and Improving Listening Skills in English Buddhism in Indian Himalayan Region Aesthetics of Postcoloniality: An Insight into Town Planning and Architectural Practices of Madras Under the Colonial Rule Entrepreneurial Education and Entrepreneurship: The Mediating Role of Social Skills in University Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1