The accessibility of administrative processes: Assessing the impacts on students in higher education

Tim Coughlan, K. Lister
{"title":"The accessibility of administrative processes: Assessing the impacts on students in higher education","authors":"Tim Coughlan, K. Lister","doi":"10.1145/3192714.3192820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Administrative processes that need to be completed to maintain a basic standard of living, to study, or to attain employment, are perceived to create burdens for disabled people. The navigation of information, forms, communications, and assessments to achieve a particular goal raises diverse accessibility issues. In this paper we explore the different types of impacts these processes have on disabled university students. We begin by surveying literature that highlights the systemic characteristics of administrative burdens and barriers for disabled people. We then describe how a participatory research exercise with students led to the development of a survey on these issues. This was completed by 104 respondents with a diverse range of declared disabilities. This provides evidence for a range of impacts, and understanding of the perceived level of challenge of commonly experienced processes. The most common negative impact reported was on stress levels. Other commonly reported impacts include exacerbation of existing conditions, time lost from study, and instances where support was not available in a timely fashion. Processes to apply for disability-related support were more commonly challenging than other types of processes. We use this research to suggest directions for improving accessibility and empowerment in this space.","PeriodicalId":330095,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Internet of Accessible Things","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Internet of Accessible Things","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3192714.3192820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Administrative processes that need to be completed to maintain a basic standard of living, to study, or to attain employment, are perceived to create burdens for disabled people. The navigation of information, forms, communications, and assessments to achieve a particular goal raises diverse accessibility issues. In this paper we explore the different types of impacts these processes have on disabled university students. We begin by surveying literature that highlights the systemic characteristics of administrative burdens and barriers for disabled people. We then describe how a participatory research exercise with students led to the development of a survey on these issues. This was completed by 104 respondents with a diverse range of declared disabilities. This provides evidence for a range of impacts, and understanding of the perceived level of challenge of commonly experienced processes. The most common negative impact reported was on stress levels. Other commonly reported impacts include exacerbation of existing conditions, time lost from study, and instances where support was not available in a timely fashion. Processes to apply for disability-related support were more commonly challenging than other types of processes. We use this research to suggest directions for improving accessibility and empowerment in this space.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行政程序的可及性:评估高等教育对学生的影响
维持基本生活水平、学习或就业所需完成的行政程序被认为给残疾人造成了负担。实现特定目标的信息、表单、通信和评估导航会引发各种可访问性问题。本文探讨了这些过程对残疾大学生的不同类型的影响。我们首先调查那些强调残疾人行政负担和障碍的系统特征的文献。然后,我们描述了与学生的参与性研究练习如何导致对这些问题的调查的发展。这项调查由104名自称残疾的受访者完成。这为一系列影响提供了证据,并理解了通常经历过程的感知挑战水平。报告中最常见的负面影响是压力水平。其他常见的影响包括现有条件的恶化,学习时间的损失,以及无法及时获得支持的情况。申请残疾相关支持的流程通常比其他类型的流程更具挑战性。我们利用这项研究提出了改善这个空间的可达性和赋权的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multi-view Mouth Renderization for Assisting Lip-reading Internet of Things (IoT) as Assistive Technology: Potential Applications in Tertiary Education Detecting Autism Based on Eye-Tracking Data from Web Searching Tasks Application for the configuration and adaptation of the Android operating system for the visually impaired DysHelper: The Dyslexia Assistive User Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1