Maternal and neonatal outcome with trial of operative vaginal delivery (TOVD) in theatre

A. Sayasneh, H. Muppala, J. Rafi, W. Hassan, M. Hanson
{"title":"Maternal and neonatal outcome with trial of operative vaginal delivery (TOVD) in theatre","authors":"A. Sayasneh, H. Muppala, J. Rafi, W. Hassan, M. Hanson","doi":"10.5580/1ff9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to know the maternal and neonatal morbidity, along withcharacteristics affecting the success of trial of operative vaginal delivery (TOVD) intheatre. This is a retrospective study of TOVD in theatre. There were 196 cases ofTOVD in theatre out of 2945 deliveries during the period of study with a total failurerate of 25.5% for all instruments used. Caesarean section and sequential instrumentaldeliveries were associated with more major complications than Neville-Barnesforceps and Kiwi ventouse cup but none with Moolgaoker and Kielland rotationalforceps deliveries. However, the numbers may be small to make a conclusion that Moolgaoker and Kielland rotational forceps had the lowest failure rate (1/16 or 6%). Non-occipitoanterior positions significantly increased the incidence of TOVD (p 0.05, no significant difference). Table 2 illustrates the major complications in 89 parturient’s and 93 babies who had TOVD and in whom notes could be reviewed. Figure 2 Table 2: Illustrate major complications with various TOVDs ANOVA for four independent samples (Table 3) to compare different fetal blood sampling results between: Kiellands, Moolgaoker, sequential instrumental delivery and CS showed that no significant difference in umbilical cord arterial or venous pH between groups (Two tailed p value is 0.07) Figure 3 Table 3: Fetal blood samples for different modes of deliveries in the study: Kiellands, Moolgaoker, sequential instrumental delivery and CS. Moolgaoker and Kielland rotational forceps had lower failure rate (6%), compared to NBF (12.5%), Kiwi (39.2%), and Sequential instrumental delivery (29.3%). ANOVA analysis between the different means has shown significant longer hospital stay for sequential instrumental deliveries and CS (p = 0.017), with an average stay of 3.88 and 5.23 days respectively. DISCUSSION There are no absolute criteria for a TOVD in theatre [3] but the RCOG [1] has suggested that higher failure rates are associated with: 1. Maternal body mass index greater than 30 2. Estimated fetal weight greater than 4000 g or a clinically big baby 3. Occipito-posterior position 4. Mid-cavity delivery or when 1/5 head palpable per abdomen. It had been reported earlier that between 2% to 5% of all instrumental deliveries are undertaken in theatre with preparations made for immediate caesarean section [4, 5]. Patients need to be reassessed again in theatre under regional analgesia and a final decision made regarding the mode of delivery and the appropriate selection of instrument. Failure rates of OVD range from 16% to 20% cases [6, 7]. The failure rate in our study was at 25.5% and that the TOVD with Kiwi has had the lowest success rate between instruments (Failure rate of 39.2%). The experience of the surgeon affects the outcome of OVD, but it is difficult to compare the success rates for different Maternal and neonatal outcome with trial of operative vaginal delivery (TOVD) in theatre 3 of 4 surgeons as they use different instruments. Moreover, an experienced obstetrician is likely to have a higher success rate due to careful patient selection. A cautious less experienced operator may also have a high success rate by performing most of his/her OVD as trials in theatre [8]. In a recent prospective case-control study it has been shown that formal training and education was associated with improved safety of instrumental vaginal delivery for both the mother and the baby [6]. There is higher maternal and fetal morbidity after failed sequential instrumental delivery [9]. Although we found that CS and sequential instrumental deliveries were more associated with complications than with the NBF and Kiwi ventouse cup, this may be due to selection bias. Therefore, we cannot conclude with enough confidence that the latter statement is true. CONCLUSION A larger prospective study to compare the different instruments in TOVD is needed. Non-occipitoanterior positions significantly increased the incidence of TOVD Failure rate of 25.5% for all instruments used. References Maternal and neonatal outcome with trial of operative vaginal delivery (TOVD) in theatre 4 of 4 Author Information A Sayasneh Women’s Health Directorate, Medway Maritime Hospital, Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY, U. K. H Muppala Women’s Health Directorate, Medway Maritime Hospital, Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY, U. K. J Rafi Women’s Health Directorate, Medway Maritime Hospital, Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY, U. K. W Hassan Women’s Health Directorate, Medway Maritime Hospital, Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY, U. K. M Hanson Women’s Health Directorate, Medway Maritime Hospital, Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY, U. K.","PeriodicalId":158103,"journal":{"name":"The Internet journal of gynecology and obstetrics","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet journal of gynecology and obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/1ff9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to know the maternal and neonatal morbidity, along withcharacteristics affecting the success of trial of operative vaginal delivery (TOVD) intheatre. This is a retrospective study of TOVD in theatre. There were 196 cases ofTOVD in theatre out of 2945 deliveries during the period of study with a total failurerate of 25.5% for all instruments used. Caesarean section and sequential instrumentaldeliveries were associated with more major complications than Neville-Barnesforceps and Kiwi ventouse cup but none with Moolgaoker and Kielland rotationalforceps deliveries. However, the numbers may be small to make a conclusion that Moolgaoker and Kielland rotational forceps had the lowest failure rate (1/16 or 6%). Non-occipitoanterior positions significantly increased the incidence of TOVD (p 0.05, no significant difference). Table 2 illustrates the major complications in 89 parturient’s and 93 babies who had TOVD and in whom notes could be reviewed. Figure 2 Table 2: Illustrate major complications with various TOVDs ANOVA for four independent samples (Table 3) to compare different fetal blood sampling results between: Kiellands, Moolgaoker, sequential instrumental delivery and CS showed that no significant difference in umbilical cord arterial or venous pH between groups (Two tailed p value is 0.07) Figure 3 Table 3: Fetal blood samples for different modes of deliveries in the study: Kiellands, Moolgaoker, sequential instrumental delivery and CS. Moolgaoker and Kielland rotational forceps had lower failure rate (6%), compared to NBF (12.5%), Kiwi (39.2%), and Sequential instrumental delivery (29.3%). ANOVA analysis between the different means has shown significant longer hospital stay for sequential instrumental deliveries and CS (p = 0.017), with an average stay of 3.88 and 5.23 days respectively. DISCUSSION There are no absolute criteria for a TOVD in theatre [3] but the RCOG [1] has suggested that higher failure rates are associated with: 1. Maternal body mass index greater than 30 2. Estimated fetal weight greater than 4000 g or a clinically big baby 3. Occipito-posterior position 4. Mid-cavity delivery or when 1/5 head palpable per abdomen. It had been reported earlier that between 2% to 5% of all instrumental deliveries are undertaken in theatre with preparations made for immediate caesarean section [4, 5]. Patients need to be reassessed again in theatre under regional analgesia and a final decision made regarding the mode of delivery and the appropriate selection of instrument. Failure rates of OVD range from 16% to 20% cases [6, 7]. The failure rate in our study was at 25.5% and that the TOVD with Kiwi has had the lowest success rate between instruments (Failure rate of 39.2%). The experience of the surgeon affects the outcome of OVD, but it is difficult to compare the success rates for different Maternal and neonatal outcome with trial of operative vaginal delivery (TOVD) in theatre 3 of 4 surgeons as they use different instruments. Moreover, an experienced obstetrician is likely to have a higher success rate due to careful patient selection. A cautious less experienced operator may also have a high success rate by performing most of his/her OVD as trials in theatre [8]. In a recent prospective case-control study it has been shown that formal training and education was associated with improved safety of instrumental vaginal delivery for both the mother and the baby [6]. There is higher maternal and fetal morbidity after failed sequential instrumental delivery [9]. Although we found that CS and sequential instrumental deliveries were more associated with complications than with the NBF and Kiwi ventouse cup, this may be due to selection bias. Therefore, we cannot conclude with enough confidence that the latter statement is true. CONCLUSION A larger prospective study to compare the different instruments in TOVD is needed. Non-occipitoanterior positions significantly increased the incidence of TOVD Failure rate of 25.5% for all instruments used. References Maternal and neonatal outcome with trial of operative vaginal delivery (TOVD) in theatre 4 of 4 Author Information A Sayasneh Women’s Health Directorate, Medway Maritime Hospital, Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY, U. K. H Muppala Women’s Health Directorate, Medway Maritime Hospital, Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY, U. K. J Rafi Women’s Health Directorate, Medway Maritime Hospital, Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY, U. K. W Hassan Women’s Health Directorate, Medway Maritime Hospital, Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY, U. K. M Hanson Women’s Health Directorate, Medway Maritime Hospital, Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY, U. K.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术阴道分娩(TOVD)在医院的产妇和新生儿结局
本研究的目的是了解产妇和新生儿的发病率,以及影响手术阴道分娩(TOVD)在剧院试验成功的特点。这是一项对剧院TOVD的回顾性研究。在研究期间,2945例分娩中有196例tovd在手术室,所有使用的器械的总失败率为25.5%。与neville - barnes钳和Kiwi ventouse cup相比,剖腹产和顺序器械分娩与主要并发症相关,但与moolgokeer和Kielland旋转钳分娩无关。然而,数字可能很小,因此可以得出结论,moolgoaker和Kielland旋转钳的失败率最低(1/16或6%)。非枕前体位明显增加TOVD的发生率(p < 0.05,差异无统计学意义)。表2列出了89名TOVD患者和93名婴儿的主要并发症,这些患者的记录可以回顾。图2表2:显示不同TOVDs的主要并发症表3:对四个独立样本(表3)进行方差分析,比较Kiellands、moolgomaker、顺序器械分娩和CS的不同胎儿血液采集结果,结果显示各组间脐带动脉或静脉pH值无显著差异(双尾p值为0.07)Kiellands, moolgogoer,顺序仪器传输和CS。moolgoaker和Kielland旋转钳的失败率(6%)低于NBF(12.5%)、Kiwi(39.2%)和顺序器械输送(29.3%)。不同方法之间的方差分析显示,顺序工具分娩和CS的住院时间明显更长(p = 0.017),平均住院时间分别为3.88天和5.23天。手术室TOVD没有绝对的标准[3],但RCOG[1]认为较高的失败率与以下因素有关:1。产妇体重指数大于30 2。估计胎重大于4000克或临床大胎3例。枕后位4。中腔分娩或每腹部可触及1/5头。此前有报道称,2%至5%的器械分娩是在手术室进行的,并为立即剖腹产做准备[4,5]。在局部镇痛下,患者需要在手术室再次接受评估,并最终决定分娩方式和合适的器械选择。OVD的失败率从16%到20%不等[6,7]。在我们的研究中,失败率为25.5%,而Kiwi的TOVD在器械之间的成功率最低(失败率为39.2%)。外科医生的经验会影响OVD的结局,但由于4位外科医生使用不同的器械,因此很难比较3区的手术阴道分娩(TOVD)对不同产妇和新生儿结局的成功率。此外,一个有经验的产科医生可能有更高的成功率,由于仔细的病人选择。一个谨慎的缺乏经验的操作者也可以通过在手术室中进行大部分的OVD试验来获得较高的成功率[8]。最近的一项前瞻性病例对照研究表明,正规培训和教育可提高阴道辅助分娩对母婴的安全性[6]。序贯工具分娩失败后,产妇和胎儿的发病率更高[9]。虽然我们发现CS和顺序器械分娩比NBF和Kiwi ventouse杯更容易引起并发症,但这可能是由于选择偏倚。因此,我们不能有把握地断定后一种说法是正确的。结论需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来比较不同器械在TOVD中的应用。在所有使用的器械中,非枕前位明显增加了TOVD失败率25.5%。参考文献4 / 4手术室阴道分娩试验的产妇和新生儿结局(TOVD)作者资料A Sayasneh妇女健康理事会,梅德韦海事医院,风车路,吉林厄姆,肯特郡,me75纽约州,英国肯特郡,吉林厄姆,风车路,梅德韦海事医院,Muppala妇女健康理事会,J Rafi妇女健康理事会,梅德韦海事医院,风车路,吉林厄姆,肯特郡,me75纽约州,英国,W哈桑妇女健康理事会,英国肯特郡吉林厄姆风车路梅德韦海事医院,英国肯特郡吉林厄姆风车路梅德韦海事医院,英国肯特郡梅德韦海事医院汉森妇女健康理事会,英国肯特郡吉林厄姆风车路梅德韦海事医院
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Tofu Consumption on Menopause Symptoms and Equol Level (7-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) chroman) VBAC In Women Undergoing IOL With Dinoprostone Versus Spontaneous Labor Extracellular Vesicles – A New Frontier In Medical Research. Researchers Can Tap On This Area For Opportunities To Further Improve Clinical Care Severe Intraabdominal Trauma In Illegal Abortion: A Case Report Placental Site Trophoblastic Tumor: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1