Do People Respond to the Mortage Interest Deduction? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Denmark

J. Gruber, A. Jensen, H. Kleven
{"title":"Do People Respond to the Mortage Interest Deduction? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Denmark","authors":"J. Gruber, A. Jensen, H. Kleven","doi":"10.3386/w23600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using linked housing and tax records from Denmark combined with a major reform of the mortgage interest deduction in the late 1980s, we carry out the first comprehensive long-term study of how tax subsidies affect housing decisions. The reform introduced a large and sharp reduction in the mortgage deduction for top-rate taxpayers, while reducing it much less or not at all for lower-rate taxpayers. We present three main findings. First, the mortgage deduction has a precisely estimated zero effect on homeownership. This holds even in the very long run. Second, the mortgage deduction has a sizeable impact on housing demand at the intensive margin, inducing homeowners to buy larger and more expensive houses. Third, the largest effect of the mortgage deduction is on household financial decisions, inducing them to increase indebtedness. These findings suggest that the mortgage interest deduction distorts the behavior of homeowners at the intensive margin, but is ineffective at promoting homeownership at the extensive margin and any externalities that may be associated with it.","PeriodicalId":130325,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Household (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Household (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/w23600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Using linked housing and tax records from Denmark combined with a major reform of the mortgage interest deduction in the late 1980s, we carry out the first comprehensive long-term study of how tax subsidies affect housing decisions. The reform introduced a large and sharp reduction in the mortgage deduction for top-rate taxpayers, while reducing it much less or not at all for lower-rate taxpayers. We present three main findings. First, the mortgage deduction has a precisely estimated zero effect on homeownership. This holds even in the very long run. Second, the mortgage deduction has a sizeable impact on housing demand at the intensive margin, inducing homeowners to buy larger and more expensive houses. Third, the largest effect of the mortgage deduction is on household financial decisions, inducing them to increase indebtedness. These findings suggest that the mortgage interest deduction distorts the behavior of homeowners at the intensive margin, but is ineffective at promoting homeownership at the extensive margin and any externalities that may be associated with it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人们对按揭利息扣除有何反应?来自丹麦的准实验证据
利用丹麦的住房和税收记录,结合20世纪80年代末抵押贷款利息扣除的重大改革,我们对税收补贴如何影响住房决策进行了首次全面的长期研究。这项改革大幅削减了最高税率纳税人的抵押贷款扣减,而对低税率纳税人的扣减幅度则小得多,甚至根本没有。我们提出了三个主要发现。首先,抵押贷款减免对房屋所有权的影响精确估计为零。即使从长远来看,这也是成立的。其次,抵押贷款减免对密集边际的住房需求产生了相当大的影响,促使房主购买更大、更昂贵的房子。第三,抵押贷款减免的最大影响是对家庭财务决策的影响,诱导他们增加负债。这些发现表明,抵押贷款利息扣除扭曲了密集边际房主的行为,但在促进广泛边际房主和任何可能与之相关的外部性方面是无效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Financial Restitution Gap in Consumer Finance: Insights from Complaints Filed with the CFPB Does Additional Mandatory Reporting Alter Charity or Donor Behavior? Examining the 2006 Pension Protection Act Entitled to Leave: The impact of Unemployment Insurance Eligibility on Employment Duration and Job Quality Economic Incentives Surrounding Fertility: Evidence from Alaska's Permanent Fund Dividend The Equilibrium and Spillover Effects of Early Retirement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1