When the European Court of Human Rights Decides Not to Decide

F. Londras
{"title":"When the European Court of Human Rights Decides Not to Decide","authors":"F. Londras","doi":"10.1017/9781108564779.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"• Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. • Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. • User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) • Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain.","PeriodicalId":192738,"journal":{"name":"Building Consensus on European Consensus","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Consensus on European Consensus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108564779.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

• Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. • Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. • User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) • Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当欧洲人权法院决定不予裁决时
•用户可以自由发布用于识别本出版物的URL。•用户可以从伯明翰大学研究门户网站下载和/或打印一份出版物,用于私人学习或非商业研究。•用户可以根据1988年《版权、设计和专利法》的“公平交易”概念使用文档摘录•用户不得进一步分发材料,也不得将其用于商业利益目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Consensus Argument in NGOs’Amicus CuriaeBriefs When to Use European Consensus Determining the Content of the European Consensus Concept Levels of Generality in the Comparative Reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice European Consensus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1