Study of Denoising Algorithms on Photoplethysmograph (PPG) Signals

Aldrin Jozefan Parsaoran, Satria Mandala, M. Pramudyo
{"title":"Study of Denoising Algorithms on Photoplethysmograph (PPG) Signals","authors":"Aldrin Jozefan Parsaoran, Satria Mandala, M. Pramudyo","doi":"10.1109/ICoDSA55874.2022.9862918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, Photoplethysmograph (PPG) signal has been widely considered for detecting heart-related diseases. It is because the operational cost of using this signal is relatively lower than other signals, such as the electrocardiogram (ECG). However, PPG signal is very susceptible to noise. Therefore, removing noise from the PPG signal data is a must. In most cases, the noise in this signal is much worse than the ECG signal. In addition, most existing research on denoising algorithms based on PPG signals is incomprehensive due to focusing on single denoising algorithm. This research provides a solution to the problems by proposing a performance study of three denoising algorithms for PPG signals, i.e., Savitzky Golay, Butterworth, and Finite Impulse Response (FIR). Method used to achieve the objective are literature study on denoising algorithms, conduct experiments on the proposed algorithms, measure and analyze the performance of the denoising algorithms based on three metrics, namely Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Mean Square Error (MSE). Rigorous experiments have been carried out, and it is proven that Savitzky's algorithm is better than the other two algorithms (i.e., Butterworth and FIR). Savitzky has SNR:17.5 dB, PSNR: 16.80 dB and MSE: 0.19. Meanwhile, Butterworth's performance is SNR: 10.168 dB, PSNR: 9.1 dB, and MSE: 0.3. Finally, the FIR algorithm has SNR: 4.796, PSNR: 16.7, and MSE: 0.2.","PeriodicalId":339135,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Data Science and Its Applications (ICoDSA)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Data Science and Its Applications (ICoDSA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoDSA55874.2022.9862918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Recently, Photoplethysmograph (PPG) signal has been widely considered for detecting heart-related diseases. It is because the operational cost of using this signal is relatively lower than other signals, such as the electrocardiogram (ECG). However, PPG signal is very susceptible to noise. Therefore, removing noise from the PPG signal data is a must. In most cases, the noise in this signal is much worse than the ECG signal. In addition, most existing research on denoising algorithms based on PPG signals is incomprehensive due to focusing on single denoising algorithm. This research provides a solution to the problems by proposing a performance study of three denoising algorithms for PPG signals, i.e., Savitzky Golay, Butterworth, and Finite Impulse Response (FIR). Method used to achieve the objective are literature study on denoising algorithms, conduct experiments on the proposed algorithms, measure and analyze the performance of the denoising algorithms based on three metrics, namely Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Mean Square Error (MSE). Rigorous experiments have been carried out, and it is proven that Savitzky's algorithm is better than the other two algorithms (i.e., Butterworth and FIR). Savitzky has SNR:17.5 dB, PSNR: 16.80 dB and MSE: 0.19. Meanwhile, Butterworth's performance is SNR: 10.168 dB, PSNR: 9.1 dB, and MSE: 0.3. Finally, the FIR algorithm has SNR: 4.796, PSNR: 16.7, and MSE: 0.2.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光容积脉搏波信号去噪算法研究
近年来,光容积脉搏波(PPG)信号被广泛认为是心脏相关疾病的检测手段。这是因为使用这种信号的操作成本相对低于其他信号,如心电图(ECG)。然而,PPG信号很容易受到噪声的影响。因此,从PPG信号数据中去除噪声是必须的。在大多数情况下,该信号中的噪声比心电信号严重得多。此外,现有的基于PPG信号的去噪算法研究大多集中在单一的去噪算法上,研究不够全面。本研究通过提出对三种PPG信号去噪算法(即Savitzky Golay, Butterworth和Finite Impulse Response (FIR))的性能研究,提供了解决这些问题的方法。实现目标的方法是对降噪算法进行文献研究,对提出的算法进行实验,并基于信噪比(SNR)、峰值信噪比(PSNR)和均方误差(MSE)三个指标对降噪算法的性能进行测量和分析。经过严格的实验,证明Savitzky算法优于其他两种算法(Butterworth和FIR)。Savitzky的信噪比为17.5 dB, PSNR为16.80 dB, MSE为0.19。同时,Butterworth的性能信噪比为10.168 dB, PSNR为9.1 dB, MSE为0.3。最后,FIR算法的信噪比为4.796,PSNR为16.7,MSE为0.2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictive Model of Student Academic Performance in Private Higher Education Institution (Case in Undergraduate Management Program) Electronic Nose and Neural Network Algorithm for Multiclass Classification of Meat Quality What Affects User Satisfaction of Payroll Information Systems? Feature Expansion with Word2Vec for Topic Classification with Gradient Boosted Decision Tree on Twitter Wave Forecast using Bidirectional GRU and GRU Method Case Study in Pangandaran, Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1