Strategic Peer Selection Using Transaction Value and Latency

Kushal Babel, Lucas Baker
{"title":"Strategic Peer Selection Using Transaction Value and Latency","authors":"Kushal Babel, Lucas Baker","doi":"10.1145/3560832.3563440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many blockchains utilize public peer-to-peer networks to communicate transactions. As activity on blockchain-based DeFi protocols has increased, there has been a sharp rise in strategic behaviour from bots and miners, commonly captured by the notion of Maximal Extractable Value (MEV). While many works have focused on MEV arising from the smart contract layer or consensus layer, in this work we study how a strategic agent can maximise realisable MEV through the optimal choice of network peers. Specifically, we study how existing definitions and algorithms for latency optimization can be augmented with information about the transactions themselves in order to optimize peering algorithms. We formally model this optimization objective for two classes of consensus protocols : 1) time-based (\"fair ordering\") protocols and 2) single leader-based protocols. We present an efficient local algorithm for choosing peers strategically, and evaluate our algorithm on real world data to show that it outperforms benchmark algorithms that either choose peers randomly or do not exploit information about blockchain transactions.","PeriodicalId":366325,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 ACM CCS Workshop on Decentralized Finance and Security","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 ACM CCS Workshop on Decentralized Finance and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3560832.3563440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Many blockchains utilize public peer-to-peer networks to communicate transactions. As activity on blockchain-based DeFi protocols has increased, there has been a sharp rise in strategic behaviour from bots and miners, commonly captured by the notion of Maximal Extractable Value (MEV). While many works have focused on MEV arising from the smart contract layer or consensus layer, in this work we study how a strategic agent can maximise realisable MEV through the optimal choice of network peers. Specifically, we study how existing definitions and algorithms for latency optimization can be augmented with information about the transactions themselves in order to optimize peering algorithms. We formally model this optimization objective for two classes of consensus protocols : 1) time-based ("fair ordering") protocols and 2) single leader-based protocols. We present an efficient local algorithm for choosing peers strategically, and evaluate our algorithm on real world data to show that it outperforms benchmark algorithms that either choose peers randomly or do not exploit information about blockchain transactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于事务值和延迟的策略对等选择
许多区块链利用公共点对点网络来通信交易。随着基于区块链的DeFi协议的活动增加,机器人和矿工的战略行为急剧增加,通常被最大可提取价值(MEV)的概念所捕获。虽然许多工作都集中在智能合约层或共识层产生的MEV上,但在这项工作中,我们研究了战略代理如何通过网络对等体的最佳选择来最大化可实现的MEV。具体地说,我们研究了现有的延迟优化定义和算法如何用有关事务本身的信息来增强,以优化对等算法。我们正式为两类共识协议建模此优化目标:1)基于时间的(“公平排序”)协议和2)基于单个领导者的协议。我们提出了一种有效的本地算法来策略性地选择节点,并在真实世界的数据上评估了我们的算法,以表明它优于随机选择节点或不利用区块链事务信息的基准算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantifying Loss in Automated Market Makers A Note On Borrowing Constant Function Market Maker Shares Concentrated Liquidity Analysis in Uniswap V3 Strategic Peer Selection Using Transaction Value and Latency Improving Proof of Stake Economic Security via MEV Redistribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1