The national curriculum in development in the reform period

Suryadi Fajri, Rilci Kurnia Ilahi, Rahmi Yunita Rilci, Khairat Arniman, Deffina Yuliani
{"title":"The national curriculum in development in the reform period","authors":"Suryadi Fajri, Rilci Kurnia Ilahi, Rahmi Yunita Rilci, Khairat Arniman, Deffina Yuliani","doi":"10.32698/ICFTK395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This artikel is titled \"National Curriculum In Its Development During the Reform period\". The main problem in writing this thesis is (1) Curriculum development in 2004 (KBK), (2) Curriculum development in 2006 (KTSP), (3) Curriculum development in 2013. The purpose of this study is to analyze the development of the curriculum in 2004 (KBK), analyze the development of the curriculum in 2006 (KTSP), analyze the development of the curriculum in 2013. To achieve the above objectives, the study was conducted using Library research using measures: The collection of data sources in this study is a printed material that can provide information about the National Curriculum in the Development of the Reform Period, primary sources are the results of research or the writings of researchers such as books: Mulyasa, curriculum level of the Unit of Education, while secondary sources are books relevant to the title of this thesis. Data collection is done with literature studies, document studies, accessing the internet. Data analysis is done by content analysis techniques and inductive methods, then described scientifically so as to produce scientific works of form (thesis) that can be accounted for scientifically. From the results of the study found that learning in kbk if viewed special characteristics that the learning system in kbk is very practical for the development of students, in the sense that this system is universal in nature that has covered the overall learning activities that become the basic needs of students. but it does not close the possibility that students need intensive direction and coaching of teachers, in order to achieve professional educational goals. In addition, the characteristics of the Education Unit Level Curriculum is an individual development-oriented curriculum, which can be seen from the basic competency standards outlined by the indicators. In ktsp there is a component of self-development that emphasizes on the aspects of talent development and student interest. From competency-based curriculum 2004, Education Unit Level Curriculum 2006, and Curriculum-13 obtained that k-13 is more efficient to improve the quality of learning learning students. However, Curriculum 13 is an improvement in the effectiveness of learning in the education unit and the addition of learning time in schools. K-13 students are looking to find out using current technology.","PeriodicalId":193298,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang - ICFTKUINIBP 2020","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang - ICFTKUINIBP 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32698/ICFTK395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This artikel is titled "National Curriculum In Its Development During the Reform period". The main problem in writing this thesis is (1) Curriculum development in 2004 (KBK), (2) Curriculum development in 2006 (KTSP), (3) Curriculum development in 2013. The purpose of this study is to analyze the development of the curriculum in 2004 (KBK), analyze the development of the curriculum in 2006 (KTSP), analyze the development of the curriculum in 2013. To achieve the above objectives, the study was conducted using Library research using measures: The collection of data sources in this study is a printed material that can provide information about the National Curriculum in the Development of the Reform Period, primary sources are the results of research or the writings of researchers such as books: Mulyasa, curriculum level of the Unit of Education, while secondary sources are books relevant to the title of this thesis. Data collection is done with literature studies, document studies, accessing the internet. Data analysis is done by content analysis techniques and inductive methods, then described scientifically so as to produce scientific works of form (thesis) that can be accounted for scientifically. From the results of the study found that learning in kbk if viewed special characteristics that the learning system in kbk is very practical for the development of students, in the sense that this system is universal in nature that has covered the overall learning activities that become the basic needs of students. but it does not close the possibility that students need intensive direction and coaching of teachers, in order to achieve professional educational goals. In addition, the characteristics of the Education Unit Level Curriculum is an individual development-oriented curriculum, which can be seen from the basic competency standards outlined by the indicators. In ktsp there is a component of self-development that emphasizes on the aspects of talent development and student interest. From competency-based curriculum 2004, Education Unit Level Curriculum 2006, and Curriculum-13 obtained that k-13 is more efficient to improve the quality of learning learning students. However, Curriculum 13 is an improvement in the effectiveness of learning in the education unit and the addition of learning time in schools. K-13 students are looking to find out using current technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改革时期国家课程的发展
本文的题目是《改革时期国家课程的发展》。撰写本文的主要问题是:(1)2004年课程开发(KBK),(2) 2006年课程开发(KTSP),(3) 2013年课程开发。本研究的目的是分析2004年(KBK)课程的发展,分析2006年(KTSP)课程的发展,分析2013年课程的发展。为达到上述目的,本研究采用图书馆研究法,采用以下方法进行:本研究收集的资料来源为能够提供改革发展时期国家课程信息的印刷材料,一手资料来源为研究成果或研究者的著作,如《Mulyasa》、《教育单位课程水平》等书籍,二手资料来源为与本文题目相关的书籍。数据收集是通过文献研究、文献研究和上网来完成的。数据分析是通过内容分析技术和归纳方法来完成的,然后科学地描述,从而产生可以科学地解释的形式(论文)的科学作品。从研究结果中发现,如果从特殊的特点来看,kbk的学习系统对于学生的发展是非常实用的,从某种意义上说,这个系统在本质上是普遍的,它涵盖了整体的学习活动,成为学生的基本需求。但这并不能排除学生需要教师的深入指导和辅导才能实现专业教育目标的可能性。此外,教育单元级课程的特点是面向个体发展的课程,这可以从指标所概括的基本能力标准中看出。在ktsp中有一个自我发展的组成部分,强调人才发展和学生兴趣方面。从能力本位课程2004年、教育单位水平课程2006年和课程13中得出,k-13更有效地提高了学生的学习质量。然而,课程13提高了教育单位的学习效率,增加了学校的学习时间。K-13的学生正在寻找使用当前技术的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teachers blue print test design in the development of learning achievement test Free learning: study of humanistic theory in islamic religious education Improve students’ mathematics achievement using cooperative learning: number head together Science learning based on ‘merdeka belajar’ in elementary school during pandemic The weakness of human in perspective of Qur’an
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1