{"title":"Testimonial cultures: An introduction","authors":"Sara Ahmed, J. Stacey","doi":"10.1080/14797580109367217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The desire to testify now pervades contemporary culture. The imperative to speak out and to tell one's story operates across the traditional boundaries of public and private spaces, and is mobilised by disenfranchised subjects and celebrities alike. These testimonial forms are evident both in popular culture, such as talk shows and confessional television more generally, and in mainstream politics, as demonstrated by the confessions of public figures, such as the late Princess Diana or President Clinton. Such imperatives have reshaped autobiography, confession and remembrance in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, producing new testimonial forms, be they visual, artefactual, spoken, written or even bodily. These numerous testimonies bring with them new obligations of witnessing; readers, viewers, spectators, consumers are all required to become witnesses as they participate in different cultural forms. The demand to match the testimonial moment with the appropriate witness response may produce ambivalent and conflicted reactions: sympathy, terror, relief, recognition, empathy, anger, resentment, denial and disbelief. We have become witnesses to the testimonial projects of survivors of rape and child sexual abuse, cancer and AIDS, racist and homophobic attacks, war and torture, as well as to the atrocities of slavery, the Holocaust and apartheid. Thus, accounts of traumas of exceptional violence and of historical injustice proliferate alongside stories of everyday discrimination or misdemeanour. To some extent, this proliferation of testimonial forms involves an extension of the legal domain into other realms of politics and culture. Testifying to historical injustice since the Holocaust has radically transformed our very notion of politics and its relationship to both truth and justice. The United Nations and its concept of 'human rights' is bound up with the duty to report rights abuses everywhere and anywhere: to both bear witness and to speak, and indeed to close the gap between witnessing and speech. Notions of 'justice' have become bound up with witnessing, testifying and truth telling, whether it is in the 'Truth and Reconciliation Commission' in South Africa, in the report","PeriodicalId":296129,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Values","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"75","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Values","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14797580109367217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 75
Abstract
The desire to testify now pervades contemporary culture. The imperative to speak out and to tell one's story operates across the traditional boundaries of public and private spaces, and is mobilised by disenfranchised subjects and celebrities alike. These testimonial forms are evident both in popular culture, such as talk shows and confessional television more generally, and in mainstream politics, as demonstrated by the confessions of public figures, such as the late Princess Diana or President Clinton. Such imperatives have reshaped autobiography, confession and remembrance in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, producing new testimonial forms, be they visual, artefactual, spoken, written or even bodily. These numerous testimonies bring with them new obligations of witnessing; readers, viewers, spectators, consumers are all required to become witnesses as they participate in different cultural forms. The demand to match the testimonial moment with the appropriate witness response may produce ambivalent and conflicted reactions: sympathy, terror, relief, recognition, empathy, anger, resentment, denial and disbelief. We have become witnesses to the testimonial projects of survivors of rape and child sexual abuse, cancer and AIDS, racist and homophobic attacks, war and torture, as well as to the atrocities of slavery, the Holocaust and apartheid. Thus, accounts of traumas of exceptional violence and of historical injustice proliferate alongside stories of everyday discrimination or misdemeanour. To some extent, this proliferation of testimonial forms involves an extension of the legal domain into other realms of politics and culture. Testifying to historical injustice since the Holocaust has radically transformed our very notion of politics and its relationship to both truth and justice. The United Nations and its concept of 'human rights' is bound up with the duty to report rights abuses everywhere and anywhere: to both bear witness and to speak, and indeed to close the gap between witnessing and speech. Notions of 'justice' have become bound up with witnessing, testifying and truth telling, whether it is in the 'Truth and Reconciliation Commission' in South Africa, in the report
作证的愿望现在弥漫在当代文化中。说出自己的故事的必要性跨越了公共和私人空间的传统界限,被剥夺公民权的主体和名人都动员起来。这些证言形式在流行文化(如谈话节目和更普遍的忏悔电视)和主流政治(如已故戴安娜王妃或克林顿总统等公众人物的忏悔)中都很明显。在20世纪末和21世纪初,这样的要求重塑了自传、忏悔和记忆,产生了新的见证形式,无论是视觉的、人工的、口头的、书面的,甚至是身体的。这些无数的见证带来了新的见证义务;读者、观众、观众、消费者在参与不同的文化形态时,都需要成为见证人。将证词时刻与适当的证人反应相匹配的要求可能会产生矛盾和冲突的反应:同情、恐惧、宽慰、认可、同情、愤怒、怨恨、否认和怀疑。我们目睹了强奸和儿童性虐待、癌症和艾滋病、种族主义和恐同袭击、战争和酷刑以及奴隶制、大屠杀和种族隔离暴行的幸存者的证言项目。因此,关于特殊暴力和历史不公正的创伤的叙述与日常歧视或轻罪的故事一起激增。在某种程度上,这种证明形式的扩散涉及到法律领域延伸到政治和文化的其他领域。对大屠杀以来历史不公的见证从根本上改变了我们对政治及其与真理和正义关系的概念。联合国及其“人权”概念与在任何地方报告侵犯人权行为的义务紧密相连:既见证又发言,实际上是缩小见证和发言之间的差距。报告指出,无论是在南非的“真相与和解委员会”(truth and Reconciliation Commission),“正义”的概念都与见证、作证和讲真话联系在一起