Implementation of the 'triple helix' model in innovation ecosystem of Ukraine

I. Bazhal
{"title":"Implementation of the 'triple helix' model in innovation ecosystem of Ukraine","authors":"I. Bazhal","doi":"10.15407/EIP2017.03.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents an analysis of the interaction between Universities, industry, the state, and scientific institutions in Ukraine in context of the implementation of \"triple helix\" model of the innovation management. This model ensures the successful and efficient processes of the commercialization of scientific and technological achievements. International comparative analysis has been presented, which showed that Ukraine is significantly behind the world trends in the development of interaction between higher educational institutions, industry, the state, and scientific institutions in this context. It is shown that Ukrainian stakeholders of the linear innovation cycle have a low level of cooperation that determines the low final economic results and effectiveness of the national innovation ecosystem, despite some progress in the intermediate stages of the innovation cycle. The presented statistical analyses demonstrate that fundamental scientific potential of Ukrainian Universities has been very poorly transformed into innovative industrial designs and in relevant commercialized innovative products. This lack is also due to objective reasons in Ukrainian legislation, which does not consider the budget organizations, including universities and research institutions, as entrepreneurial entities entitled to receive income in the form of profit. The article proposes the managerial model \"triple helix\" as the measure to improve this situation. It is important to transform the existing linear model of innovation cycle in Ukraine for conversion to cooperative model, and the adoption of appropriate special legislation for this. The carried on analysis has shown that Ukraine has considerable financial potential for economic support of the \"triple helix\" model. Each institutional component of the innovation cycle, working separately, cannot effectively provide the final commercial result of innovation. This is due to the fact that each such institution lacks creative cooperation and the use of achievements received by another institution that works at another stage of the innovation cycle. Accordingly, the low final innovative performance of each staker of the innovation process limits the interest of investors in financing innovative processes. This applies to both private and public investors, including the Ministry of Finance. The \"triple helix\" model allows us to eliminate this shortcoming, and to successfully bring innovations to the final commercial stage of the innovation cycle, which will create a positive financial result that will in turn attract investors for all the institutional constituents. In framework of this managerial approach, it is necessary to significantly increase the role and motivation of Ukrainian Universities to influence all processes of innovation cycle, because these institutions naturally become the system-forming centers of the \"triple helix\" model. To accomplish this task, it is possible to use the already well-developed experience of NTUU \"Kyiv Polytechnic Institute\" that has become realistic due to adopting for this University a special law that stimulated its innovative activity. The analysis has shown the existence of significant innovation potential of the several dozen Ukrainian Universities to complete their beginner stages of innovative cycles for the commercial mode. Therefore, one of the most urgent and quick legislative steps for the transition to the \"Triple helix\" model in Ukraine may be the adoption of a legal document similar to the Law on Science Park \"Kyiv Polytechnic\", for the majority of universities of Ukraine, which are ready to become entrepreneurial Universities.","PeriodicalId":212761,"journal":{"name":"Economy and Forecasting","volume":"198 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economy and Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/EIP2017.03.124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The article presents an analysis of the interaction between Universities, industry, the state, and scientific institutions in Ukraine in context of the implementation of "triple helix" model of the innovation management. This model ensures the successful and efficient processes of the commercialization of scientific and technological achievements. International comparative analysis has been presented, which showed that Ukraine is significantly behind the world trends in the development of interaction between higher educational institutions, industry, the state, and scientific institutions in this context. It is shown that Ukrainian stakeholders of the linear innovation cycle have a low level of cooperation that determines the low final economic results and effectiveness of the national innovation ecosystem, despite some progress in the intermediate stages of the innovation cycle. The presented statistical analyses demonstrate that fundamental scientific potential of Ukrainian Universities has been very poorly transformed into innovative industrial designs and in relevant commercialized innovative products. This lack is also due to objective reasons in Ukrainian legislation, which does not consider the budget organizations, including universities and research institutions, as entrepreneurial entities entitled to receive income in the form of profit. The article proposes the managerial model "triple helix" as the measure to improve this situation. It is important to transform the existing linear model of innovation cycle in Ukraine for conversion to cooperative model, and the adoption of appropriate special legislation for this. The carried on analysis has shown that Ukraine has considerable financial potential for economic support of the "triple helix" model. Each institutional component of the innovation cycle, working separately, cannot effectively provide the final commercial result of innovation. This is due to the fact that each such institution lacks creative cooperation and the use of achievements received by another institution that works at another stage of the innovation cycle. Accordingly, the low final innovative performance of each staker of the innovation process limits the interest of investors in financing innovative processes. This applies to both private and public investors, including the Ministry of Finance. The "triple helix" model allows us to eliminate this shortcoming, and to successfully bring innovations to the final commercial stage of the innovation cycle, which will create a positive financial result that will in turn attract investors for all the institutional constituents. In framework of this managerial approach, it is necessary to significantly increase the role and motivation of Ukrainian Universities to influence all processes of innovation cycle, because these institutions naturally become the system-forming centers of the "triple helix" model. To accomplish this task, it is possible to use the already well-developed experience of NTUU "Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" that has become realistic due to adopting for this University a special law that stimulated its innovative activity. The analysis has shown the existence of significant innovation potential of the several dozen Ukrainian Universities to complete their beginner stages of innovative cycles for the commercial mode. Therefore, one of the most urgent and quick legislative steps for the transition to the "Triple helix" model in Ukraine may be the adoption of a legal document similar to the Law on Science Park "Kyiv Polytechnic", for the majority of universities of Ukraine, which are ready to become entrepreneurial Universities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“三螺旋”模式在乌克兰创新生态系统中的实施
本文分析了在实施“三螺旋”创新管理模式的背景下,乌克兰大学、产业、国家和科研机构之间的互动关系。这种模式确保了科技成果商业化的成功和高效的过程。国际比较分析表明,在这方面,乌克兰在发展高等教育机构、工业、国家和科学机构之间的互动方面远远落后于世界趋势。研究表明,尽管在创新周期的中间阶段取得了一些进展,但乌克兰线性创新周期的利益相关者的合作水平较低,这决定了国家创新生态系统的最终经济成果和有效性较低。所提出的统计分析表明,乌克兰大学的基础科学潜力很少转化为创新的工业设计和相关的商业化创新产品。这种缺乏也是由于乌克兰立法中的客观原因,其中不认为预算组织,包括大学和研究机构,是有权以利润形式获得收入的企业实体。本文提出了“三螺旋”管理模式作为改善这一状况的措施。将乌克兰现有的线性创新周期模式转变为合作模式十分重要,并为此制定相应的专门立法。分析表明,乌克兰在“三螺旋”模式的经济支持方面具有相当大的财政潜力。创新周期的每个制度组成部分,如果单独工作,就不能有效地提供创新的最终商业结果。这是因为每个这样的机构都缺乏创造性的合作,也没有利用在创新周期的另一个阶段工作的另一个机构所取得的成果。因此,创新过程中各利益相关者的低最终创新绩效限制了投资者对创新过程融资的兴趣。这适用于包括财政部在内的私人和公共投资者。“三螺旋”模型使我们能够消除这一缺点,并成功地将创新带到创新周期的最后商业阶段,这将创造积极的财务结果,进而吸引所有机构成分的投资者。在这种管理方法的框架内,有必要显著提高乌克兰大学的作用和动机,以影响创新周期的所有过程,因为这些机构自然成为“三螺旋”模式的系统形成中心。为了完成这一任务,有可能利用NTUU“基辅理工学院”已经发展良好的经验,由于为这所大学采用了一项刺激其创新活动的特殊法律,这种经验已经成为现实。分析表明,乌克兰几十所大学在完成商业模式创新周期的初级阶段方面存在着巨大的创新潜力。因此,乌克兰向“三螺旋”模式过渡的最紧迫和最迅速的立法步骤之一可能是通过类似于“基辅理工学院”科技园法的法律文件,为乌克兰的大多数大学准备成为创业型大学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Science and innovation in Ukraine: approaches to policy making in times of war REGULATION OF UKRAINE’S COMMODITY MARKETS IN CONDITIONS OF EMERGENCY AND MARTIAL LAW A RHYMED CHRONICLE OF THE WAR UKRAINE’S POST-WAR ECONOMY: INTERNATIONAL AID AND GROWTH POLICY STRATEGIES OF ECONOMIC STABILITY IN UNSTABLE ENVIRONMENT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1