Cerclage outcomes in singleton pregnancies at risk for preterm birth following assisted reproductive treatments

G. Sahin, Ferruh Acet, E. T. Tavmergen Goker, E. Tavmergen
{"title":"Cerclage outcomes in singleton pregnancies at risk for preterm birth following assisted reproductive treatments","authors":"G. Sahin, Ferruh Acet, E. T. Tavmergen Goker, E. Tavmergen","doi":"10.46328/aejog.v3i3.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We aimed to evaluate the obstetric and neonatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies at risk for preterm birth (PTB) following assisted reproductive treatments and underwent cervical cerclage placement. \nMaterial and methods: A total of 42 women with singleton pregnancies following ART who underwent cerclage between 2009-2021 were included in this retrospective study.  Indications of the cerclage procedure, gestational age at cerclage placement and delivery, neonatal birthweight, and requirement for admission to the neonatal unit of newborns were evaluated. \nResults: Of those cerclage placement performed in women with a history of second-trimester loss (19%), women with suspected cervical insufficiency according to pre-pregnancy evaluation (52.4%), women with the unicornuate uterus (4.8%), women with cervical shortening/or suspicious changes on ultrasonography (11.9%), and women with detection of cervical dilatation/shortening beyond 20 weeks of gestation (11.9%). Of the total group, 7.1% resulted in late miscarriages, while the remaining 92.9% ended with a live birth with mean gestational age at delivery of 37.0±2.5 weeks. Of those live births, 92.3% (36/39) delivered at >34 weeks and %74.4 (29/39) delivered at term. Except one neonatal death due to extremely PTB at 26th weeks, all infants were discharged from the hospital with well condition. \nConclusion: ART pregnancies are evaluated as a special group as having a higher PTB risk at baseline. Cerclage may be considered in broader indications for suspected cervical insufficiency in these pregnancies. There is need for further studies on the effectiveness of cerclage in these ART pregnancies with suspected cervical insufficiency based on different criterions used.","PeriodicalId":159256,"journal":{"name":"Aegean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aegean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46328/aejog.v3i3.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the obstetric and neonatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies at risk for preterm birth (PTB) following assisted reproductive treatments and underwent cervical cerclage placement. Material and methods: A total of 42 women with singleton pregnancies following ART who underwent cerclage between 2009-2021 were included in this retrospective study.  Indications of the cerclage procedure, gestational age at cerclage placement and delivery, neonatal birthweight, and requirement for admission to the neonatal unit of newborns were evaluated. Results: Of those cerclage placement performed in women with a history of second-trimester loss (19%), women with suspected cervical insufficiency according to pre-pregnancy evaluation (52.4%), women with the unicornuate uterus (4.8%), women with cervical shortening/or suspicious changes on ultrasonography (11.9%), and women with detection of cervical dilatation/shortening beyond 20 weeks of gestation (11.9%). Of the total group, 7.1% resulted in late miscarriages, while the remaining 92.9% ended with a live birth with mean gestational age at delivery of 37.0±2.5 weeks. Of those live births, 92.3% (36/39) delivered at >34 weeks and %74.4 (29/39) delivered at term. Except one neonatal death due to extremely PTB at 26th weeks, all infants were discharged from the hospital with well condition. Conclusion: ART pregnancies are evaluated as a special group as having a higher PTB risk at baseline. Cerclage may be considered in broader indications for suspected cervical insufficiency in these pregnancies. There is need for further studies on the effectiveness of cerclage in these ART pregnancies with suspected cervical insufficiency based on different criterions used.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助生殖治疗后有早产风险的单胎妊娠结扎结局
目的:我们旨在评估有早产风险的单胎妊娠在辅助生殖治疗和宫颈环切放置后的产科和新生儿结局。材料和方法:本回顾性研究共纳入了42名2009-2021年间接受环扎术的ART后单胎妊娠妇女。评估了环切术的适应症、环切术放置和分娩时的胎龄、新生儿出生体重和新生儿入住新生儿病房的要求。结果:在进行环扎术的女性中,有妊娠中期丢失史的女性(19%)、根据孕前评估怀疑宫颈功能不全的女性(52.4%)、子宫呈独角形的女性(4.8%)、宫颈缩短或超声检查有可疑变化的女性(11.9%)、妊娠20周以上宫颈扩张/缩短的女性(11.9%)。其中,7.1%晚期流产,92.9%活产,平均胎龄37.0±2.5周。在这些活产婴儿中,92.3%(36/39)在>34周分娩,%74.4(29/39)足月分娩。除1例新生儿在26周时死于重度肺结核外,所有婴儿出院时状况良好。结论:ART妊娠作为一个特殊群体在基线时具有较高的PTB风险。妊娠期怀疑宫颈功能不全时,可考虑更广泛的指征环扎术。基于不同的标准,需要进一步研究环扎术对怀疑宫颈功能不全的ART妊娠的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of an antioxidant agent-multivitamin complex food supplement on spermiogram in infertile men The effect of anti-phospholipid syndrome on pregnancy outcomes in patients with habitual abortus Results of karyotype analysis and 22q11.2 (DiGeorge Syndrome critical region) deletion investigation in fetal cardiac system anomalies Evaluation of maternal and neonatal outcomes of emergency cesarean deliveries in cases of placenta previa uncomplicated with placenta acreata spectrum Impact of the type of ductus venosus agenesis and the presence of associated anomalies on prognosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1