[Clinical studies on tumor markers for monitoring prostate cancer patients; the evaluation of prostate-specific antigen and comparison with prostatic acid phosphatase and gamma-seminoprotein].

Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi Pub Date : 1990-11-20
I Shinoda
{"title":"[Clinical studies on tumor markers for monitoring prostate cancer patients; the evaluation of prostate-specific antigen and comparison with prostatic acid phosphatase and gamma-seminoprotein].","authors":"I Shinoda","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the usefulness of tumor markers in monitoring the patients with prostate cancer, serial measurements of serum prostate-specific antigen (PA), prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-Sm) were performed in 78 stage C or D patients. Positive rates of each marker prior to the treatment were as follows; PA; 75%, PAP; 56% and gamma-Sm; 62% in stage C, and PA; 95%, PAP; 79% and gamma-Sm; 91% in stage D. In most cases showing PR (partial response) and S (stable) in clinical responses, these three markers decreased their serum titers corresponding to clinical course if the markers were elevated at the start of the treatment. But the usefulness of PAP was lessened because of its lower positive rate than those of PA and gamma-Sm. In 33 PD (progressive disease) cases, positive rates of each marker at time of clinical diagnosis as PD were found to be 85% in PA, 55% in PAP and 76% in gamma-Sm. And with the combination assays of these three tumor markers, positive rate was elevated to 88%. Moreover, elevation of serum values of these three markers at 3 months before the progression event were observed in 50% of PA, 39% of PAP and 46% of gamma-Sm. Then the prognostic significance of each marker was examined. In PA and PAP, there were statistical differences in non-relapsing rates between patients whose reduction rates from the pretreatment value on 7th day were more than and less than 50%. But in gamma-Sm, a statistical difference between each group was firstly observed on 14th day. As a result, in monitoring patients with prostate cancer, PA and gamma-Sm are more useful than PAP and, in prediction of patients' prognosis, PA is more useful than gamma-Sm.</p>","PeriodicalId":76232,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi","volume":"25 11","pages":"2627-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the usefulness of tumor markers in monitoring the patients with prostate cancer, serial measurements of serum prostate-specific antigen (PA), prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-Sm) were performed in 78 stage C or D patients. Positive rates of each marker prior to the treatment were as follows; PA; 75%, PAP; 56% and gamma-Sm; 62% in stage C, and PA; 95%, PAP; 79% and gamma-Sm; 91% in stage D. In most cases showing PR (partial response) and S (stable) in clinical responses, these three markers decreased their serum titers corresponding to clinical course if the markers were elevated at the start of the treatment. But the usefulness of PAP was lessened because of its lower positive rate than those of PA and gamma-Sm. In 33 PD (progressive disease) cases, positive rates of each marker at time of clinical diagnosis as PD were found to be 85% in PA, 55% in PAP and 76% in gamma-Sm. And with the combination assays of these three tumor markers, positive rate was elevated to 88%. Moreover, elevation of serum values of these three markers at 3 months before the progression event were observed in 50% of PA, 39% of PAP and 46% of gamma-Sm. Then the prognostic significance of each marker was examined. In PA and PAP, there were statistical differences in non-relapsing rates between patients whose reduction rates from the pretreatment value on 7th day were more than and less than 50%. But in gamma-Sm, a statistical difference between each group was firstly observed on 14th day. As a result, in monitoring patients with prostate cancer, PA and gamma-Sm are more useful than PAP and, in prediction of patients' prognosis, PA is more useful than gamma-Sm.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肿瘤标志物监测前列腺癌患者的临床研究;前列腺特异性抗原的评价及与前列腺酸性磷酸酶和γ -精氨酸蛋白的比较。
为了评估肿瘤标志物在监测前列腺癌患者中的作用,对78例C期或D期患者进行了血清前列腺特异性抗原(PA)、前列腺酸性磷酸酶(PAP)和γ -精氨酸蛋白(γ - sm)的连续测定。治疗前各标志物阳性率如下:PA;75%,人民行动党;56%和γ - sm;C期62%,PA期62%;95%,人民行动党;79%和γ - sm;在大多数临床反应显示PR(部分缓解)和S(稳定)的病例中,如果在治疗开始时标记物升高,这三种标记物的血清滴度相应于临床病程降低。但PAP的阳性率低于PA和γ - sm,降低了PAP的有效性。在33例PD(进展性疾病)病例中,临床诊断为PD时各标志物阳性率PA为85%,PAP为55%,γ - sm为76%。三种肿瘤标志物联合检测,阳性率提高至88%。此外,50%的PA患者、39%的PAP患者和46%的gamma-Sm患者在进展事件发生前3个月的血清中这三种标志物的升高。然后检查各指标的预后意义。在PA和PAP方面,第7天较预处理值降低率大于和小于50%的患者的不复发率有统计学差异。但在γ - sm,第14天首次观察到各组之间的统计学差异。因此,在前列腺癌患者的监测中,PA和gamma-Sm比PAP更有用,在预测患者预后方面,PA比gamma-Sm更有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Chemoembolization therapy with lipiodol, cisplatin and etoposide for hepatocellular carcinoma]. [Relationship between human papillomavirus and oncogenes (c-myc, N-myc) amplification in human cervical cancers]. [Treatment of liver metastatic ovarian cancer with sequential administration of OK-432 and etoposide]. Flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA content in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. [The effect on prognosis and the adverse drug reaction of intermittent cisplatin therapy in advanced ovarian cancer patients].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1