Do I Own My Organs?

M. Gershun, J. Lantos
{"title":"Do I Own My Organs?","authors":"M. Gershun, J. Lantos","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501755439.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter evaluates the author's narrative after her meeting with Deb Porter Gill. It offers a variety of outcomes if the author had not liked Deb and withdrawn the offer to donate. That could have been for any reason, including political values, lifestyle, religion, or skin color. The chapter argues that living donors are treated by the law and by doctors as the owners of their bodies, and their body parts are considered goods that they can donate or not to whomever they want. The chapter examines the justice-based approach to organ allocation. In contrast with the living donors, cadaveric donors are generally put into national pools and allocated according to nationally agreed-upon criteria. The chapter states that their use is governed not by the autonomy-based preferences of the donor or the donor's family but, instead, by considerations of justice that are built into the administrative rules that dictate how organs should be allocated. Ultimately, the chapter presents the practical reasons for treating cadaveric organs differently than organs from a living donor.","PeriodicalId":297467,"journal":{"name":"Kidney to Share","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney to Share","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501755439.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter evaluates the author's narrative after her meeting with Deb Porter Gill. It offers a variety of outcomes if the author had not liked Deb and withdrawn the offer to donate. That could have been for any reason, including political values, lifestyle, religion, or skin color. The chapter argues that living donors are treated by the law and by doctors as the owners of their bodies, and their body parts are considered goods that they can donate or not to whomever they want. The chapter examines the justice-based approach to organ allocation. In contrast with the living donors, cadaveric donors are generally put into national pools and allocated according to nationally agreed-upon criteria. The chapter states that their use is governed not by the autonomy-based preferences of the donor or the donor's family but, instead, by considerations of justice that are built into the administrative rules that dictate how organs should be allocated. Ultimately, the chapter presents the practical reasons for treating cadaveric organs differently than organs from a living donor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我拥有我的器官吗?
本章评价作者与黛布·波特·吉尔会面后的叙述。如果作者不喜欢黛布并撤回捐赠提议,它会提供各种结果。这可能是任何原因造成的,包括政治价值观、生活方式、宗教信仰或肤色。该章节认为,法律和医生将活体捐赠者视为自己身体的主人,他们的身体部位被视为物品,他们可以将其捐赠或不捐赠给任何他们想要的人。本章探讨了以公正为基础的器官分配方法。与活体捐献者不同的是,尸体捐献者通常被纳入国家捐献库,并根据国家商定的标准进行分配。这一章指出,它们的使用不是由捐赠者或捐赠者家庭基于自主的偏好决定的,而是由行政规则中规定如何分配器官的正义考虑决定的。最后,本章提出了处理尸体器官与活体供体器官不同的实际原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Odyssey Continues Why Not Me? Are “Stranger Donors” Irrational? Going Public, Moving Forward Paired Exchanges, Chain Donations, and Organ Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1