Digital Transformation and the Legal Profession: How Corporate Legal Departments Should Digitally Transform to Create New Forms of Value

M. DeStefano, Bjarne P. Tellmann, Daniel Wu
{"title":"Digital Transformation and the Legal Profession: How Corporate Legal Departments Should Digitally Transform to Create New Forms of Value","authors":"M. DeStefano, Bjarne P. Tellmann, Daniel Wu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3905328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due in part to the COVID-19 pandemic, enhancements in technology, as well as shifts in the macroeconomic and socioeconomic dynamics of globalization, Digital Transformation (DT) has become an enterprise-wide imperative for most multinational companies (MNCs). As such, legal departments are being challenged to embrace enterprise DT and start their own department’s DT journeys. Despite these trends, there is little scholarship and research about how MNC legal departments attempt to meet the DT challenge: What are GCs doing to support enterprise level DT, and how are they digitally transforming their own departments? And importantly, is what they are doing effective and value-accretive? How should they approach their DT journeys?Based on interviews of 23 General Counsels and Chief Digital Officers of S&P 500 MNCs along with the authors’ professional experience, we investigate in-house legal departments’ response and approach to DT and recommend a new model approach. Standard depictions of MNC legal departments suggest that they are viewed as cost centers. And much of the literature focuses on how GCs can add value by improving efficiency and lowering cost. The literature also appears to assume law firms provide more creative, strategic, value-additive advice than in-house legal departments. Contrary to such depictions, we contend that DT can enable legal departments to add value that external providers cannot, and that goes far beyond efficiency generation, cost reduction, and increased speed-to-market. We identify a Legal DT Maturity Framework that maps corporate legal departments’ DT trajectory into three common phases. We argue that the current three-phased approach to DT that many GCs utilize generates some added value but does not enable the full potential of DT to be harnessed. Drawing upon lessons from our interviewees’ experiences and our own, we articulate a best-practices model for how legal departments should approach DT to generate new forms of value and shift from being a cost center to a revenue generator and value creator. Our model demonstrates that the GC, as internal to the MNC, has an advantage (as compared to external providers) in understanding the MNC’s strategic priorities and risk preferences and, therefore, is better at identifying the right and best opportunities to leverage and exploit to the MNC’s advantage.In addition to filling some of the gaps in the literature, this article provides a vision that has broad applicability beyond the MNC legal department context and can be used as a model for law firms and other legal services providers to harness DT in their own contexts, so as to stay at pace with—and better serve—clients with the never-ending DT challenges emerging on their horizons.","PeriodicalId":447199,"journal":{"name":"Other Corporate Governance eJournal","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Other Corporate Governance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3905328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due in part to the COVID-19 pandemic, enhancements in technology, as well as shifts in the macroeconomic and socioeconomic dynamics of globalization, Digital Transformation (DT) has become an enterprise-wide imperative for most multinational companies (MNCs). As such, legal departments are being challenged to embrace enterprise DT and start their own department’s DT journeys. Despite these trends, there is little scholarship and research about how MNC legal departments attempt to meet the DT challenge: What are GCs doing to support enterprise level DT, and how are they digitally transforming their own departments? And importantly, is what they are doing effective and value-accretive? How should they approach their DT journeys?Based on interviews of 23 General Counsels and Chief Digital Officers of S&P 500 MNCs along with the authors’ professional experience, we investigate in-house legal departments’ response and approach to DT and recommend a new model approach. Standard depictions of MNC legal departments suggest that they are viewed as cost centers. And much of the literature focuses on how GCs can add value by improving efficiency and lowering cost. The literature also appears to assume law firms provide more creative, strategic, value-additive advice than in-house legal departments. Contrary to such depictions, we contend that DT can enable legal departments to add value that external providers cannot, and that goes far beyond efficiency generation, cost reduction, and increased speed-to-market. We identify a Legal DT Maturity Framework that maps corporate legal departments’ DT trajectory into three common phases. We argue that the current three-phased approach to DT that many GCs utilize generates some added value but does not enable the full potential of DT to be harnessed. Drawing upon lessons from our interviewees’ experiences and our own, we articulate a best-practices model for how legal departments should approach DT to generate new forms of value and shift from being a cost center to a revenue generator and value creator. Our model demonstrates that the GC, as internal to the MNC, has an advantage (as compared to external providers) in understanding the MNC’s strategic priorities and risk preferences and, therefore, is better at identifying the right and best opportunities to leverage and exploit to the MNC’s advantage.In addition to filling some of the gaps in the literature, this article provides a vision that has broad applicability beyond the MNC legal department context and can be used as a model for law firms and other legal services providers to harness DT in their own contexts, so as to stay at pace with—and better serve—clients with the never-ending DT challenges emerging on their horizons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字化转型与法律职业:企业法律部门如何进行数字化转型以创造新的价值形式
部分由于2019冠状病毒病大流行、技术进步以及全球化带来的宏观经济和社会经济动态变化,数字化转型已成为大多数跨国公司在整个企业范围内的当务之急。因此,法律部门面临的挑战是接受企业的数据挖掘,并开始自己部门的数据挖掘之旅。尽管有这些趋势,但关于跨国公司法律部门如何应对数据挖掘挑战的学术和研究很少:GCs在支持企业级数据挖掘方面做了什么,以及他们如何对自己的部门进行数字化转型?更重要的是,他们所做的是有效的和增值的吗?他们应该如何处理自己的DT旅程?基于对标准普尔500强跨国公司的23位总法律顾问和首席数字官的采访以及作者的专业经验,我们调查了内部法律部门对数字数据挖掘的反应和方法,并推荐了一种新的模型方法。对跨国公司法律部门的标准描述表明,它们被视为成本中心。许多文献关注的是gc如何通过提高效率和降低成本来增加价值。这些文献似乎还假设,律师事务所提供的建议比内部法律部门更具创造性、战略性和增值性。与这样的描述相反,我们认为数字技术可以使法律部门增加外部供应商无法增加的价值,这远远超出了产生效率、降低成本和加快上市速度。我们确定了一个法律DT成熟度框架,该框架将公司法律部门的DT轨迹划分为三个共同阶段。我们认为,目前许多GCs使用的三阶段DT方法产生了一些附加价值,但不能充分利用DT的潜力。根据受访者的经验和我们自己的经验,我们阐述了一个最佳实践模型,说明法律部门应该如何利用数据挖掘来创造新形式的价值,并从成本中心转变为收入创造者和价值创造者。我们的模型表明,作为跨国公司内部的GC在理解跨国公司的战略重点和风险偏好方面具有优势(与外部供应商相比),因此,更善于识别正确和最佳的机会,以利用和利用跨国公司的优势。除了填补文献中的一些空白之外,本文还提供了一个具有广泛适用性的愿景,超出了跨国公司法律部门的范围,可以作为律师事务所和其他法律服务提供商在其自身环境中利用DT的模型,以便与客户保持同步并更好地服务于他们的视野中不断出现的永无止境的DT挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Transformation and the Legal Profession: How Corporate Legal Departments Should Digitally Transform to Create New Forms of Value The Impact of Board Independence and Foreign Ownership on Financial and Social Performance of Firms: Evidence from the UAE Tobin's Q and its Determinants: A Study on Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Foundation Ownership at IKEA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1