A Broad Three-Point Reparations Program for US Afrodescendants versus CARICOM's 10-Point Program

Brooks Robinson
{"title":"A Broad Three-Point Reparations Program for US Afrodescendants versus CARICOM's 10-Point Program","authors":"Brooks Robinson","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2585727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"US Afrodescendants should welcome the Caribbean Community of Nations’ (CARICOM) decision to play the role of David versus Goliath in demanding reparations from former European colonialist powers. However, inherent characteristics that define CARICOM Afrodescendants are quite different from those that define US Afrodescendants. Consequently, US Afrodescendants should eschew CARICOM’s 10-point reparations program in favor of developing a reparations program of our own. In this article, we highlight key differences between CARICOM and US Afrodescendants, and we argue for a reparations program for US Afrodescendants that has nation formation as its central tenet. We suggest that a US Afrodescendant reparations program should reflect three broad points: Land, resources, and international support. While CARICOM’s and US Afrodescendants’ reparations programs should be dissimilar, when realized, both programs can produce similar freedom fruits.","PeriodicalId":259047,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Race & Ethnicity (Sub-Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Race & Ethnicity (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2585727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

US Afrodescendants should welcome the Caribbean Community of Nations’ (CARICOM) decision to play the role of David versus Goliath in demanding reparations from former European colonialist powers. However, inherent characteristics that define CARICOM Afrodescendants are quite different from those that define US Afrodescendants. Consequently, US Afrodescendants should eschew CARICOM’s 10-point reparations program in favor of developing a reparations program of our own. In this article, we highlight key differences between CARICOM and US Afrodescendants, and we argue for a reparations program for US Afrodescendants that has nation formation as its central tenet. We suggest that a US Afrodescendant reparations program should reflect three broad points: Land, resources, and international support. While CARICOM’s and US Afrodescendants’ reparations programs should be dissimilar, when realized, both programs can produce similar freedom fruits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对美国非洲后裔的三点赔偿方案与加勒比共同体的十点赔偿方案
美国的非洲后裔应该欢迎加勒比国家共同体(CARICOM)决定扮演大卫对抗歌利亚的角色,要求前欧洲殖民主义列强赔偿。然而,定义加勒比共同体非洲后裔的固有特征与定义美国非洲后裔的固有特征大不相同。因此,美国的非洲后裔应该避开加勒比共同体的10点赔偿计划,而倾向于制定我们自己的赔偿计划。在这篇文章中,我们强调了加勒比共同体和美国非洲后裔之间的主要区别,我们主张为美国非洲后裔制定一个以国家形成为中心原则的赔偿计划。我们建议美国的非裔赔偿计划应反映三个要点:土地、资源和国际支持。虽然加勒比共同体和美国非洲后裔的赔偿计划应该是不同的,但当实现时,这两个计划可以产生类似的自由成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Family, Schools, or Culture: What Explains Differences in U.S. Student Achievement Across Ethnic Groups on PISA 2012? Racialisation, Ethnicity and Governance: Conceptual Clarifications and Critical Analysis The Image of Roma Population Reflected in the Pages of Romanian Review 'Revista 22' (2009-2017). From National to European Perspective Jewish Organizations From Romania – Role and Activity The Long Shadow of Jewish Persecution on Financial Decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1