AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT IN CONSTRUCTING SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE MADE BY THE SECOND SEMESTER STUDENTS OF LAW FACULTY

Meikardo Samuel Prayuda
{"title":"AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT IN CONSTRUCTING SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE MADE BY THE SECOND SEMESTER STUDENTS OF LAW FACULTY","authors":"Meikardo Samuel Prayuda","doi":"10.54367/kairos.v4i3.1145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was aimed to find out the subject-verb agreement error made by the second semester students of Law Faculty UNIKA Santo Thomas. From the findings, 27% of the instruments answered by the students were identified error. There were 4 kinds of error made by the students in constructing subject-verb agreement. They were omission error, addition error, misformation error, and misordering error. In omission error, there were 26 errors occurred. In addition error, there were 5 errors occurred. In misformation error, there were 54 errors occurred. In misordering error, there was 1 error occurred. Among all of the errors that had been identified, misformation error was the most dominan error faced by the students. Based on the analysis, the possible cause of error was because of the students did not understand well about the construction of the simple present tense mastery. Although only 27% instrument was identified error, it was considered that the students’ lack of knowledge in structure could give serious impact to their writing. It was suggested that the students need to enrich their knowledge at least in the mastery of the simple present tense, specially in the construction of subject-verb agreement. In other hand, the faculty need to make extra class for the English subject to give the students more chance to enhance their English knowledge. This would support the vision of UNIKA Santo Thomas in achieving International Level University.","PeriodicalId":184113,"journal":{"name":"Kairos English Language Teaching Journal","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kairos English Language Teaching Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54367/kairos.v4i3.1145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research was aimed to find out the subject-verb agreement error made by the second semester students of Law Faculty UNIKA Santo Thomas. From the findings, 27% of the instruments answered by the students were identified error. There were 4 kinds of error made by the students in constructing subject-verb agreement. They were omission error, addition error, misformation error, and misordering error. In omission error, there were 26 errors occurred. In addition error, there were 5 errors occurred. In misformation error, there were 54 errors occurred. In misordering error, there was 1 error occurred. Among all of the errors that had been identified, misformation error was the most dominan error faced by the students. Based on the analysis, the possible cause of error was because of the students did not understand well about the construction of the simple present tense mastery. Although only 27% instrument was identified error, it was considered that the students’ lack of knowledge in structure could give serious impact to their writing. It was suggested that the students need to enrich their knowledge at least in the mastery of the simple present tense, specially in the construction of subject-verb agreement. In other hand, the faculty need to make extra class for the English subject to give the students more chance to enhance their English knowledge. This would support the vision of UNIKA Santo Thomas in achieving International Level University.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法学院第二学期学生一般现在时结构主谓一致错误分析
本研究旨在找出圣托马斯大学法学院第二学期学生的主谓一致错误。从调查结果来看,学生回答的仪器中有27%是识别错误的。学生在构建主谓一致时出现了4种错误。它们是遗漏错误、添加错误、误读错误和顺序错误。在遗漏错误中,出现了26个错误。除错误外,还发生了5次错误。在误读错误中,发生了54个错误。在错序错误中,发生了1个错误。在所有已识别的错误中,误读错误是学生面临的最主要的错误。分析认为,出现错误的原因可能是学生对一般现在时的结构不太了解。虽然只有27%的工具被识别出错误,但我们认为学生在结构知识方面的缺乏会对他们的写作产生严重的影响。建议学生至少在一般现在时的掌握上,特别是在主谓一致的结构上,需要丰富自己的知识。另一方面,教师需要为英语科目开设额外的课程,给学生更多的机会来提高他们的英语知识。这将支持UNIKA圣托马斯大学实现国际水平大学的愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Analysis of Oral Variety in Medan City THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AUDIO VISUAL MEDIA TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ SKILL IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXTS TO THE NINTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP SWASTA PABA BINJAI IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2020/2021 THE APPLICATION OF CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS THE CASE OF LEARNING LATIN LANGUAGE ANALYZING STUDENTS’ ERRORS IN WRITING COMPOSITION. A THESIS. TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY. CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF SAINT THOMAS. APPLYING PEER TEACHING TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ GRAMMAR ACHIEVEMENT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1