Controlling Competitive Dynamics by Taking Strategic Initiative

I. MacMillan
{"title":"Controlling Competitive Dynamics by Taking Strategic Initiative","authors":"I. MacMillan","doi":"10.5465/AME.1988.4275518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today the popular press as well as the academic literature is replete with discussions of the increased turbulence of competition. The surviving competitors in the wake of this past decade's turbulent times are highly competent, aggressive, and possess significant resources. The implication for corporate strategy is that any competitive advantage currently held will eventually be eroded by the actions of these competent, resourceful opponents. It is no longer a question of whether the current competitive advantage will be eroded but rather a question of when. As a result, the challenge for today's strategist is to constantly seek the \"second act\" even as the firm is benefiting from the current competitive advantage it should be laying the groundwork for the upcoming competitive advantage. This challenge is best depicted by Exhibit 1. From the time the firm decides to make some strategic move to secure the initiative to the time that this initiative has been achieved and some type of competitive advantage has been created, is called the launch period. It is critical to minimize this period of time. The longer it takes to get an initiative in place, the more likely it is competitors will spot the move and the more time they will have to develop a counterinitiative. Furthermore, the launch period is a period of investment rather than revenue generation. So the longer it takes, the more we have to discount the revenue streams that result from having secured the initiative. In today's high cost capital markets, projects with long launch periods and high early outlays seldom return a positive net present value.","PeriodicalId":337734,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Executive","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"57","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Executive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.1988.4275518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57

Abstract

Today the popular press as well as the academic literature is replete with discussions of the increased turbulence of competition. The surviving competitors in the wake of this past decade's turbulent times are highly competent, aggressive, and possess significant resources. The implication for corporate strategy is that any competitive advantage currently held will eventually be eroded by the actions of these competent, resourceful opponents. It is no longer a question of whether the current competitive advantage will be eroded but rather a question of when. As a result, the challenge for today's strategist is to constantly seek the "second act" even as the firm is benefiting from the current competitive advantage it should be laying the groundwork for the upcoming competitive advantage. This challenge is best depicted by Exhibit 1. From the time the firm decides to make some strategic move to secure the initiative to the time that this initiative has been achieved and some type of competitive advantage has been created, is called the launch period. It is critical to minimize this period of time. The longer it takes to get an initiative in place, the more likely it is competitors will spot the move and the more time they will have to develop a counterinitiative. Furthermore, the launch period is a period of investment rather than revenue generation. So the longer it takes, the more we have to discount the revenue streams that result from having secured the initiative. In today's high cost capital markets, projects with long launch periods and high early outlays seldom return a positive net present value.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过战略主动控制竞争动态
今天,大众媒体和学术文献都充斥着对日益激烈的竞争的讨论。在经历了过去十年的动荡之后,幸存下来的竞争对手都非常能干、积极进取,并拥有大量资源。这对企业战略的启示是,目前拥有的任何竞争优势最终都会被这些有能力、足智多谋的对手的行动所侵蚀。问题不再是当前的竞争优势是否会被削弱,而是何时会被削弱。因此,今天的战略家面临的挑战是不断寻求“第二幕”,即使公司从当前的竞争优势中受益,它也应该为即将到来的竞争优势奠定基础。表1最好地描述了这一挑战。从公司决定采取一些战略行动来确保主动权的时间到该主动权已经实现并创造了某种类型的竞争优势的时间,称为启动期。尽量减少这段时间是至关重要的。采取主动行动所需的时间越长,竞争对手就越有可能发现这一行动,他们就有更多的时间来制定反主动行动。此外,发布期是一个投资期,而不是创收期。因此,花费的时间越长,我们就越必须对获得主动性所带来的收入流进行折扣。在当今高成本的资本市场上,启动周期长、前期支出高的项目很少能获得正的净现值回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Closing the performance feedback gap with expert systems Cross-border transfer of knowledge: Cultural lessons from Project GLOBE Kaleidoscope careers: An alternate explanation for the “opt-out“ revolution The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Stimulating Effective Corporate Entrepreneurship Executives Ask: How and why should firms and their employees set goals? Editor's introduction: Establishing organizational goals and rewards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1