Formal-informal economy linkages: What implications for poverty in South Africa?

I. Valodia, R. Devey
{"title":"Formal-informal economy linkages: What implications for poverty in South Africa?","authors":"I. Valodia, R. Devey","doi":"10.4314/LDD.V14I1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea of dualism in the South African economy, characterized by a “first” and “second” economy has come to dominate government thinking in recent years. Using the panel component of the Labour Force Survey (LFS), the authors explore linkages between the formal and informal economy. \n \nTheir analysis suggests that there is a high level of interaction between formal and informal work, at the lower end of the labour market. At the household level too, access to stable employment in the formal economy is associated with higher levels of earning in the informal economy. The findings have implications for poverty analysis in South Africa. Policy which views poverty as being located outside the mainstream of the economy – in the so-called ‘second’ economy – is misleading. Instead, an integrated approach which views poverty as linked to and a product of the trajectory and growth patterns of the South African economy is suggested as a more useful conceptualisation of poverty and inequality in South Africa.","PeriodicalId":341103,"journal":{"name":"Law, Democracy and Development","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Democracy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/LDD.V14I1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

The idea of dualism in the South African economy, characterized by a “first” and “second” economy has come to dominate government thinking in recent years. Using the panel component of the Labour Force Survey (LFS), the authors explore linkages between the formal and informal economy. Their analysis suggests that there is a high level of interaction between formal and informal work, at the lower end of the labour market. At the household level too, access to stable employment in the formal economy is associated with higher levels of earning in the informal economy. The findings have implications for poverty analysis in South Africa. Policy which views poverty as being located outside the mainstream of the economy – in the so-called ‘second’ economy – is misleading. Instead, an integrated approach which views poverty as linked to and a product of the trajectory and growth patterns of the South African economy is suggested as a more useful conceptualisation of poverty and inequality in South Africa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正式与非正式经济的联系:对南非的贫困有什么影响?
近年来,以“第一经济”和“第二经济”为特征的南非经济二元论思想主导了政府的思维。利用劳动力调查(LFS)的面板组件,作者探讨了正规经济和非正规经济之间的联系。他们的分析表明,在劳动力市场的低端,正式工作和非正式工作之间存在着高度的相互作用。在家庭一级,在正规经济中获得稳定的就业机会也与非正规经济中较高的收入水平有关。这些发现对南非的贫困分析具有启示意义。将贫困视为经济主流之外——即所谓的“第二”经济——的政策具有误导性。相反,认为贫穷与南非经济的发展轨迹和增长模式有联系并是其产物的综合办法被认为是对南非贫穷和不平等的更有用的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A critique of the efficacy of the right to shelter for street children in Kenya A critical analysis of Massmart Holdings and Others v South African Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union [2022] ZALCJHB 119 The rights of women in unregistered customary marriages in Zimbabwe: Best practices from South Africa Eliminating racial discrimination of employees: An assessment of the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, as amended A turning-point for transitional justice? Political violence in Zimbabwe, and transformative justice as a way forward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1