Relationship between Test Item Arrangements and Testee's Performance and Test Usefulness Criteria

G. Abbasian, Hanieh Zadsar
{"title":"Relationship between Test Item Arrangements and Testee's Performance and Test Usefulness Criteria","authors":"G. Abbasian, Hanieh Zadsar","doi":"10.5430/IJELT.V6N2P52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Test method, test content and test type are supposed to affect test taker's performance and have close connectionswith test characteristics. However, these issues have not been subject to much in-depth investigations. To shed somelights on the issues like test item arrangements in relation to test taker's performance, test usefulness criteriaincluding test Validity, Reliability, Impact, Interactiveness, Authenticity, and Practicality, and also test characteristicssuch as Item Facility (IF), Item Discrimination (ID), and Choice Distribution (CD), this ex post facto design studywas conducted with a group of Iranian EFL learners. For this purpose, some university randomly selected studentsmajoring in English Language Teaching, English Translation Studies, and English Literature and learners fromdifferent language institutes received a version of the Nelson proficiency test. Then, two different versions of a sameresearcher-made test in terms of item arrangements were administered to 116 students obtaining an acceptable scorein the Nelson proficiency test. Simultaneously, a Test Usefulness Criteria Questionnaire developed and validated byAbbasian and Nassirian (2015) based on Bachman and Palmer’s (1996) framework, was also attempted by theparticipants. Respective statistical analyses revealed contradictorily that test item arrangement did not have anysignificant effect on the performance of the test takers. However, test usefulness criteria, though with varying extent,proved to be subject to test item arrangement. In the same vein, IF and ID were also affected in the light of testmethod facet. The first contradictory finding leaves room open for further research, while the reaming findings offerinsights to test developers, classroom teachers and all practitioners to pay due attention to test method facets in theireducational assessment decisions as the learners' performance, nature of the measurement devices as well as thenature of the construct itself are all affected test method factors.","PeriodicalId":231165,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of English Language Teaching","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/IJELT.V6N2P52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Test method, test content and test type are supposed to affect test taker's performance and have close connectionswith test characteristics. However, these issues have not been subject to much in-depth investigations. To shed somelights on the issues like test item arrangements in relation to test taker's performance, test usefulness criteriaincluding test Validity, Reliability, Impact, Interactiveness, Authenticity, and Practicality, and also test characteristicssuch as Item Facility (IF), Item Discrimination (ID), and Choice Distribution (CD), this ex post facto design studywas conducted with a group of Iranian EFL learners. For this purpose, some university randomly selected studentsmajoring in English Language Teaching, English Translation Studies, and English Literature and learners fromdifferent language institutes received a version of the Nelson proficiency test. Then, two different versions of a sameresearcher-made test in terms of item arrangements were administered to 116 students obtaining an acceptable scorein the Nelson proficiency test. Simultaneously, a Test Usefulness Criteria Questionnaire developed and validated byAbbasian and Nassirian (2015) based on Bachman and Palmer’s (1996) framework, was also attempted by theparticipants. Respective statistical analyses revealed contradictorily that test item arrangement did not have anysignificant effect on the performance of the test takers. However, test usefulness criteria, though with varying extent,proved to be subject to test item arrangement. In the same vein, IF and ID were also affected in the light of testmethod facet. The first contradictory finding leaves room open for further research, while the reaming findings offerinsights to test developers, classroom teachers and all practitioners to pay due attention to test method facets in theireducational assessment decisions as the learners' performance, nature of the measurement devices as well as thenature of the construct itself are all affected test method factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测试项目安排与测试者表现及测试有用性标准的关系
考试方法、考试内容、考试类型都是影响考生成绩的因素,与考试特点密切相关。然而,这些问题还没有得到深入的调查。为了揭示与考生成绩相关的测试项目安排、测试有用性标准(包括测试效度、信度、影响、互动性、真实性和实用性)以及测试特征(如项目便利(IF)、项目辨别(ID)和选择分布(CD))等问题,本研究对一组伊朗英语学习者进行了事后设计研究。为此,一些大学随机选择了英语教学、英语翻译研究和英语文学专业的学生以及来自不同语言学院的学生,接受了一种版本的尼尔森能力测试。然后,对116名在尼尔森熟练程度测试中获得可接受分数的学生进行了两种不同版本的相同研究人员制作的测试,其中包括项目安排。同时,参与者也尝试了abbasian和Nassirian(2015)基于Bachman和Palmer(1996)的框架开发和验证的测试有用性标准问卷。各自的统计分析矛盾地显示,测试项目的安排对考生的表现没有任何显著的影响。然而,测试有用性标准在不同程度上受到测试项目安排的影响。同样,在测试方法方面,IF和ID也受到影响。第一个相互矛盾的发现为进一步的研究留下了空间,而扩展的发现为测试开发者、课堂教师和所有从业者在他们的教育评估决策中给予应有的关注测试方法方面提供了见解,因为学习者的表现、测量设备的性质以及结构本身的性质都是影响测试方法的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Listening and Speaking Activities An Investigation of Cultural Sensitivity and Teachers’ Classroom Management To What Extent Are Listening and Speaking Tasks Through Textbooks Aligned with the Communicative Approach? Teachers’ Attitude Resources in Translation Teaching from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory The Effects of Using the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) on the Fundamental English Classes of Thai EFL Learners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1