EVALUATION OF POLICY IMPLEMENTATION 2018 VISIT YEAR AS AN EFFORT TO IMPROVE THE ECONOMIC INDEPENDENCE OF THE COMMUNITY IN SUMENEP REGENCY

W. Rasaili, N. Alfiyah
{"title":"EVALUATION OF POLICY IMPLEMENTATION 2018 VISIT YEAR AS AN EFFORT TO IMPROVE THE ECONOMIC INDEPENDENCE OF THE COMMUNITY IN SUMENEP REGENCY","authors":"W. Rasaili, N. Alfiyah","doi":"10.19184/issrd.v1i1.13724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to evaluate the implementation of visit year 2018 policy as a way to developed regional tourism and increase regional economic independence . The program of visit  year 2018 started to be planned as policy featured local of  Sumenep government  since  2016. The policy as the program featured to develop a variety of tourism potential of the region, such as marine tourism, health tourism, tourism keris, culture and palace. But in fact, the increase in the economy of Sumenep district from 2016-2018 was quite slow, the increase was only 0,20 percent, the lowest compared to other districts in East Java . This condition is related to the ineffective implementation of the 2018 visit year policy. Good policies without effective implementation, policies will not be success (Akib and Tarigan, 2008). Policy implementation needs to get more attention, because policies will not find expectations if the implementation is not optimal (Pulzl and Treib. 2014: 127). This study uses a qualitative descriptive method. This study explained that the policy implementation of the visit year 2018 was not effective. 4 (four) indicators of policy implementation as in Edward III's theory, and the environmental aspects of implementation proposed by Nakamura and Smallwood (1980) , not running optimally, 1) human resources are not optimally prepared, and development is slow, 2) coordination and communication between actors in tourism development is still weak, 3) The dispositions didn’t work systematically organized, 4) The aspects of bureaucratic structure still occur over lapping between each OPD .The study recommends that need to be did developing human resources, the coordination and effective communicate between actors in the policy, and the disposition clearly, especially in the OPD. \nKeywords: Evaluation , policy implementation , visit year 2018, economic independence","PeriodicalId":417926,"journal":{"name":"The International Seminar Series on Regional Dynamics Proceeding","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Seminar Series on Regional Dynamics Proceeding","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19184/issrd.v1i1.13724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of visit year 2018 policy as a way to developed regional tourism and increase regional economic independence . The program of visit  year 2018 started to be planned as policy featured local of  Sumenep government  since  2016. The policy as the program featured to develop a variety of tourism potential of the region, such as marine tourism, health tourism, tourism keris, culture and palace. But in fact, the increase in the economy of Sumenep district from 2016-2018 was quite slow, the increase was only 0,20 percent, the lowest compared to other districts in East Java . This condition is related to the ineffective implementation of the 2018 visit year policy. Good policies without effective implementation, policies will not be success (Akib and Tarigan, 2008). Policy implementation needs to get more attention, because policies will not find expectations if the implementation is not optimal (Pulzl and Treib. 2014: 127). This study uses a qualitative descriptive method. This study explained that the policy implementation of the visit year 2018 was not effective. 4 (four) indicators of policy implementation as in Edward III's theory, and the environmental aspects of implementation proposed by Nakamura and Smallwood (1980) , not running optimally, 1) human resources are not optimally prepared, and development is slow, 2) coordination and communication between actors in tourism development is still weak, 3) The dispositions didn’t work systematically organized, 4) The aspects of bureaucratic structure still occur over lapping between each OPD .The study recommends that need to be did developing human resources, the coordination and effective communicate between actors in the policy, and the disposition clearly, especially in the OPD. Keywords: Evaluation , policy implementation , visit year 2018, economic independence
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估2018年访问年度的政策执行情况,以提高社区在紧急情况下的经济独立性
本研究旨在评估2018年旅游年政策的实施,以发展区域旅游业和提高区域经济独立性。自2016年起,苏梅内普政府开始将2018年的访问项目作为政策特色地方进行规划。该政策作为该计划的特色是开发该地区的各种旅游潜力,如海洋旅游、健康旅游、旅游keris、文化和宫殿。但事实上,从2016年到2018年,Sumenep区的经济增长相当缓慢,增长率仅为0.2%,与东爪哇其他地区相比最低。这种情况与2018年访问年政策执行不力有关。好的政策没有有效的执行,政策就不会成功(Akib和Tarigan, 2008)。政策的执行需要得到更多的关注,因为如果政策的执行不是最优的,政策就不会找到期望(Pulzl和Treib. 2014: 127)。本研究采用定性描述方法。这项研究解释了2018年访问年的政策执行效果不佳。(4)爱德华三世理论中的政策执行指标以及Nakamura和Smallwood(1980)提出的政策执行的环境方面运行不佳;(1)人力资源准备不佳,开发缓慢;(2)旅游开发中行为体之间的协调和沟通仍然薄弱;4)各科室之间仍然存在官僚结构方面的重叠现象。研究建议需要在人力资源开发、政策参与者之间的协调和有效沟通以及明确的处置方面做得更好,特别是在科室。关键词:评价、政策实施、2018年访问、经济独立
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SMART CITY'S SUCCESS: THE IMPORTANCE OF STAKEHOLDER COLLABORATION DESIGN OF PANCASILA IN TROIKA TRAINS POVERTY, REGIONAL LEGACY IN STRENGTH PRESPECTIVE DIFFERENCES OF JOB SATISFACTION AMONG THREE GENERATIONS: A STUDY IN PT ASDP INDONESIA FERRY (PERSERO) COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PLASTIC WASTE BANKS IN PASURUAN REGENCY EAST JAVA PROVINCE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1