Are MOOC forums changing?

Oleksandra Poquet, Nia Dowell, Christopher A. Brooks, S. Dawson
{"title":"Are MOOC forums changing?","authors":"Oleksandra Poquet, Nia Dowell, Christopher A. Brooks, S. Dawson","doi":"10.1145/3170358.3170416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been a growing trend in higher education towards increased use and adoption of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Despite this interest in learning at scale, limited work has compared MOOC activity across subsequent course offerings. In this study, we explore forum activity in ten iterations of the same MOOC. Our results suggest that participation in MOOC forums has changed over the past four years of delivery. First, overall participation in MOOC forums have decreased. Second, in later iterations cohorts of more committed forum users start to resemble formal online courses in size (67>n>36). However, despite the smaller groups of learners that should find it easier to form connections with one another, our analysis did not reveal the expected increase in the quality of social activity. Instead, MOOC forums evolved into smaller on-task question and answer (Q&A) spaces, not capitalizing on the opportunities for social learning. We discuss practical and research implications of such changes.","PeriodicalId":437369,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge","volume":"138 12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

There has been a growing trend in higher education towards increased use and adoption of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Despite this interest in learning at scale, limited work has compared MOOC activity across subsequent course offerings. In this study, we explore forum activity in ten iterations of the same MOOC. Our results suggest that participation in MOOC forums has changed over the past four years of delivery. First, overall participation in MOOC forums have decreased. Second, in later iterations cohorts of more committed forum users start to resemble formal online courses in size (67>n>36). However, despite the smaller groups of learners that should find it easier to form connections with one another, our analysis did not reveal the expected increase in the quality of social activity. Instead, MOOC forums evolved into smaller on-task question and answer (Q&A) spaces, not capitalizing on the opportunities for social learning. We discuss practical and research implications of such changes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MOOC论坛在变化吗?
高等教育越来越多地使用和采用大规模开放在线课程(MOOCs)。尽管人们对大规模学习感兴趣,但将MOOC活动与随后的课程进行比较的研究有限。在这项研究中,我们在同一MOOC的十个迭代中探索论坛活动。我们的研究结果表明,在过去四年的交付中,参与MOOC论坛的情况发生了变化。首先,MOOC论坛的总体参与度有所下降。其次,在后来的迭代中,更忠诚的论坛用户群体开始在规模上类似于正式的在线课程(67>n>36)。然而,尽管较小的学习者群体应该发现更容易形成彼此之间的联系,但我们的分析并没有揭示社会活动质量的预期提高。相反,MOOC论坛演变成了更小的按任务提问和回答(Q&A)空间,没有利用社交学习的机会。我们讨论了这些变化的实际意义和研究意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The half-life of MOOC knowledge: a randomized trial evaluating knowledge retention and retrieval practice in MOOCs The influence of students' cognitive and motivational characteristics on students' use of a 4C/ID-based online learning environment and their learning gain Connecting decentralized learning records: a blockchain based learning analytics platform Towards a writing analytics framework for adult english language learners Gaze insights into debugging behavior using learner-centred analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1