Populism—A Crux or Crisis of Politics? Laclau versus Arendt

E. Ziarek
{"title":"Populism—A Crux or Crisis of Politics? Laclau versus Arendt","authors":"E. Ziarek","doi":"10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article juxtaposes Laclau’s defense of left-wing populism with Arendt’s theory of democratic alliances and political action. This juxtaposition adds two new questions to the debates on populism: First, what is the relation between popular political demands and populist identities? Second, is popular agency synonymous with popular sovereignty? Ultimately at stake in this debate is the articulation of political engagements that are able to provide an alternative to the right-wing mobilization of populism.","PeriodicalId":231294,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article juxtaposes Laclau’s defense of left-wing populism with Arendt’s theory of democratic alliances and political action. This juxtaposition adds two new questions to the debates on populism: First, what is the relation between popular political demands and populist identities? Second, is popular agency synonymous with popular sovereignty? Ultimately at stake in this debate is the articulation of political engagements that are able to provide an alternative to the right-wing mobilization of populism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民粹主义——政治的症结还是危机?拉克劳与阿伦特之争
摘要:本文将拉克劳对左翼民粹主义的辩护与阿伦特的民主联盟和政治行动理论进行对比分析。这种并置给关于民粹主义的争论增加了两个新问题:第一,大众政治诉求与民粹主义身份之间的关系是什么?第二,人民代理是否等同于人民主权?这场辩论的最终利害攸关之处在于,能否为右翼动员民粹主义提供一种替代方案的政治参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tribalism and Compassion in the Age of a Pandemic The Specter of the Amazon: FEMEN's Utopian Reappropriation of the Female Breast Editor's Introduction Unruly Audience: Folk Interventions in Popular Media Gods, Games, and Globalization: New Perspectives on Religion and Sport ed. by Rebecca T. Alpert and Arthur Remillard (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1