Revisiting Inner Entanglements in Classical Planning

L. Chrpa, M. Vallati
{"title":"Revisiting Inner Entanglements in Classical Planning","authors":"L. Chrpa, M. Vallati","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-330-8-75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Automated Planning, learning and exploiting structural patterns of plans, domain models and/or problem models, in order to improve plan generation speed-up and increase the scope of problems solved, has attracted much research. Reformulation techniques such as those based on macro-operators or entanglements are very promising, mainly because they are planner independent. This paper aims to extend and revisit the recent work on inner entanglements, relations between pairs of planning operators and predicates encapsulating exclusivity of predicate ‘achievements‘ or ‘requirements’, in order to bring new theoretical results (PSPACE completeness of deciding inner entanglements), present a new way of encoding of inner entanglements and empirical comparison between different kinds of inner entanglements.","PeriodicalId":322432,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Conference on AI","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Conference on AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-330-8-75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In Automated Planning, learning and exploiting structural patterns of plans, domain models and/or problem models, in order to improve plan generation speed-up and increase the scope of problems solved, has attracted much research. Reformulation techniques such as those based on macro-operators or entanglements are very promising, mainly because they are planner independent. This paper aims to extend and revisit the recent work on inner entanglements, relations between pairs of planning operators and predicates encapsulating exclusivity of predicate ‘achievements‘ or ‘requirements’, in order to bring new theoretical results (PSPACE completeness of deciding inner entanglements), present a new way of encoding of inner entanglements and empirical comparison between different kinds of inner entanglements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视经典规划中的内在纠缠
在自动化规划中,学习和开发计划、领域模型和/或问题模型的结构模式,以提高计划生成的速度和增加解决问题的范围,引起了人们的广泛研究。基于宏观操作符或纠缠的重构技术非常有前途,主要是因为它们与规划器无关。本文旨在扩展和回顾最近关于内纠缠、计划算子对之间的关系以及封装谓词“成就”或“要求”的排他性的谓词的工作,以带来新的理论结果(决定内纠缠的PSPACE完备性),提出一种新的内纠缠编码方式和不同类型内纠缠之间的经验比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Goal-driven, assistive agents for instructing and guiding user activities On Associative Confounder Bias Heuristics for Determining the Elimination Ordering in the Influence Diagram Evaluation with Binary Trees Revisiting Inner Entanglements in Classical Planning Error AMP Chain Graphs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1