Switch off a Robot, Switch off a Mind?

Nicolas Spatola
{"title":"Switch off a Robot, Switch off a Mind?","authors":"Nicolas Spatola","doi":"10.1145/3349537.3351897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A future world populated by robots is a projection that has long inspired and still inspires science-fiction stories. How to consider these artificial agents is a tremendous question for human society as it highlights an eternal issue \"What defines human?\" More precisely, \"What defines the human mind?\" In these two studies, we investigate how individuals' representation of mind may define attitudes towards robots and pro/antisocial behaviours towards them. Also, we evaluate the role of human-robot interaction as a moderator of the above-mentioned process. Our study's results demonstrate that the conceptualization of mind as a function results in more positive attitudes towards robots, and a lesser likelihood of acting negatively toward them. The opposite is true for participants who consider the mind as a human essence. Finally, we show that interaction with a robot seems to level out these differences. These results are discussed in terms of attitudes towards robots measured and implications for future human-robot interaction (HRI).","PeriodicalId":188834,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3349537.3351897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

A future world populated by robots is a projection that has long inspired and still inspires science-fiction stories. How to consider these artificial agents is a tremendous question for human society as it highlights an eternal issue "What defines human?" More precisely, "What defines the human mind?" In these two studies, we investigate how individuals' representation of mind may define attitudes towards robots and pro/antisocial behaviours towards them. Also, we evaluate the role of human-robot interaction as a moderator of the above-mentioned process. Our study's results demonstrate that the conceptualization of mind as a function results in more positive attitudes towards robots, and a lesser likelihood of acting negatively toward them. The opposite is true for participants who consider the mind as a human essence. Finally, we show that interaction with a robot seems to level out these differences. These results are discussed in terms of attitudes towards robots measured and implications for future human-robot interaction (HRI).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关掉机器人,关掉大脑?
一个由机器人组成的未来世界一直是科幻小说的灵感来源。如何看待这些人工智能是人类社会面临的一个巨大问题,因为它突出了一个永恒的问题:“什么定义了人类?”更准确地说,“是什么定义了人类的思维?”在这两项研究中,我们调查了个体的思维表征如何定义对机器人的态度以及对机器人的亲/反社会行为。此外,我们评估了人机交互作为上述过程的调节器的作用。我们的研究结果表明,将思维概念化作为一种功能,会导致人们对机器人持更积极的态度,而对机器人采取消极行动的可能性更小。对于那些认为心灵是人类本质的参与者来说,情况正好相反。最后,我们表明,与机器人的互动似乎消除了这些差异。这些结果在对机器人的态度和未来人机交互(HRI)的影响方面进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Design Method of the Virtual Teacher Are We Having Fun Yet?: Designing for Fun in Artificial Intelligence That Is Multicultural and Multiplatform A Conversational Robotic Approach to Dementia Symptoms: Measuring Its Effect on Older Adults Let Me Get To Know You Better: Can Interactions Help to Overcome Uncanny Feelings? Factors Influencing Empathic Behaviors for Virtual Agents: -Examining about the Effect of Embodiment-
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1