Linking knowledge-intensive firm locations with the urban structure of the city of Munich

Christiane Müller, Jonas Glässer, Mathias Heidinger, A. Thierstein
{"title":"Linking knowledge-intensive firm locations with the urban structure of the city of Munich","authors":"Christiane Müller, Jonas Glässer, Mathias Heidinger, A. Thierstein","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2023.2229629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Knowledge-intensive location decisions follow different logics on different scales to optimise their value-creation processes across space. However, the resilience and innovation capacity of the economy and society face structural challenges of deglobalisation, decarbonisation, demographics and digitalisation. At the same time, the demand for knowledge-intensive workers is increasing. The location choices of firms are confronted with rapidly altering market forces. The growing demand-side power of the workforce – and their location preferences – challenge firms and cities to rethink the use and design of space and neighbourhoods. Against the backdrop of this interdependence between strategic location choice and the increasing demand power of knowledge-intensive workers, we examine which locations and thus which spaces are chosen in the Functional Urban Area of Munich and Freising and how this choice has changed over a 10-year period. We assume that, depending on the knowledge base of the firm, the location preferences will differ from each other. We try to elucidate this process of transformation by linking a multi-scalar perspective on firm locations with georeferenced data for each firm location. This relational approach bridges the functional location choice logic of multi-location multi-branch firms in the knowledge economy with spatial attributes at the neighbourhood level, which we use as a spatial interpretive background. The strong preference for easy access to public spaces, urban amenities and mixeduse areas are interrelated through multi-scalar change processes at various inter-scalar levels and thus may alter the urban scale and, eventually, the wider city-regional scale. The findings will enable local planning and real estate development strategies to reconcile the acute transformation needs of firm locations with integrative urban development in order to create added spatial value for the entire city.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"disP - The Planning Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2023.2229629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Knowledge-intensive location decisions follow different logics on different scales to optimise their value-creation processes across space. However, the resilience and innovation capacity of the economy and society face structural challenges of deglobalisation, decarbonisation, demographics and digitalisation. At the same time, the demand for knowledge-intensive workers is increasing. The location choices of firms are confronted with rapidly altering market forces. The growing demand-side power of the workforce – and their location preferences – challenge firms and cities to rethink the use and design of space and neighbourhoods. Against the backdrop of this interdependence between strategic location choice and the increasing demand power of knowledge-intensive workers, we examine which locations and thus which spaces are chosen in the Functional Urban Area of Munich and Freising and how this choice has changed over a 10-year period. We assume that, depending on the knowledge base of the firm, the location preferences will differ from each other. We try to elucidate this process of transformation by linking a multi-scalar perspective on firm locations with georeferenced data for each firm location. This relational approach bridges the functional location choice logic of multi-location multi-branch firms in the knowledge economy with spatial attributes at the neighbourhood level, which we use as a spatial interpretive background. The strong preference for easy access to public spaces, urban amenities and mixeduse areas are interrelated through multi-scalar change processes at various inter-scalar levels and thus may alter the urban scale and, eventually, the wider city-regional scale. The findings will enable local planning and real estate development strategies to reconcile the acute transformation needs of firm locations with integrative urban development in order to create added spatial value for the entire city.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将知识密集型企业所在地与慕尼黑城市结构联系起来
摘要:知识密集型区位决策遵循不同尺度下的不同逻辑,以优化其跨空间的价值创造过程。然而,经济和社会的韧性和创新能力面临着去全球化、去碳化、人口结构和数字化的结构性挑战。与此同时,对知识密集型工人的需求也在增加。企业的区位选择面临着快速变化的市场力量。劳动力日益增长的需求方力量——以及他们对地点的偏好——迫使企业和城市重新思考空间和社区的使用和设计。在战略位置选择与知识密集型工人日益增长的需求力量之间相互依赖的背景下,我们研究了慕尼黑和弗雷辛的功能城区选择了哪些位置和空间,以及这种选择在10年期间的变化情况。我们假设,根据企业的知识基础,企业的区位偏好是不同的。我们试图通过将企业位置的多标量视角与每个企业位置的地理参考数据联系起来,来阐明这一转换过程。这种关系方法将知识经济中多地点多分支企业的功能区位选择逻辑与社区层面的空间属性联系起来,并将其作为空间解释背景。人们对公共空间、城市便利设施和混合用途区域的强烈偏好是相互关联的,通过各种尺度间的多尺度变化过程,从而可能改变城市规模,最终改变更广泛的城市区域规模。研究结果将使当地规划和房地产开发战略能够协调企业所在地的迫切转型需求和综合城市发展,从而为整个城市创造额外的空间价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Karl Ganser. Integratives Planen und Handeln Leadership – collectively oriented: Insights from trajectories of temporary urbanism Die Bereitstellung von leistbarem Wohnraum in Zeiten der Wohnkrise Breaking out of the box – towards functional spatial planning Bucharest – the role of spatial planning in a challenging urban environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1