A Study on Work made for Hire in the Amended Bill of the Copyright Act

Ji-Young Han
{"title":"A Study on Work made for Hire in the Amended Bill of the Copyright Act","authors":"Ji-Young Han","doi":"10.30582/kdps.2022.35.4.131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, discussions on work made for hire, which have been a lot of issues in the past in the field of copyright, are underway again. Furthermore, amendments to work made for hire have been drawn in drafts of the Copyright Act from the viewpoint of the amended Bill as well as the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. Works made for hire have been controversial in that they give the authorship to juridical person, not employee of a legal person, as the only exception to the ‘creator principle’, which is the underlying principle in the Copyright Act. Under the circumstances, it is desirable to submit an amendment on work made for hire in the drafts of the Copyright Act from the viewpoints of the amended Bill as well as Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, but there are still insufficient aspects to calm controversy as to work made for hire. It is believed that many domestic scholars have made meaningful suggestions on various issues raised by work made for hire. In this paper, the application of the legal philosophical theory on work made for hire was reviewed, and a regulation on work made for hire in the Korea Copyright Act is comparatively analyzed with the relevant overseas legislations. In addition, the previous researchers' suggestions on work made for hire were analyzed and summarized, and the drafts of the Copyright Act from the viewpoints of the amended Bill as well as Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism were reviewed from a critical point of view. In this regard, I suggested the direction to be amended as to issues on work made for hire in my own way.","PeriodicalId":350441,"journal":{"name":"Korea Copyright Commission","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea Copyright Commission","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30582/kdps.2022.35.4.131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, discussions on work made for hire, which have been a lot of issues in the past in the field of copyright, are underway again. Furthermore, amendments to work made for hire have been drawn in drafts of the Copyright Act from the viewpoint of the amended Bill as well as the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. Works made for hire have been controversial in that they give the authorship to juridical person, not employee of a legal person, as the only exception to the ‘creator principle’, which is the underlying principle in the Copyright Act. Under the circumstances, it is desirable to submit an amendment on work made for hire in the drafts of the Copyright Act from the viewpoints of the amended Bill as well as Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, but there are still insufficient aspects to calm controversy as to work made for hire. It is believed that many domestic scholars have made meaningful suggestions on various issues raised by work made for hire. In this paper, the application of the legal philosophical theory on work made for hire was reviewed, and a regulation on work made for hire in the Korea Copyright Act is comparatively analyzed with the relevant overseas legislations. In addition, the previous researchers' suggestions on work made for hire were analyzed and summarized, and the drafts of the Copyright Act from the viewpoints of the amended Bill as well as Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism were reviewed from a critical point of view. In this regard, I suggested the direction to be amended as to issues on work made for hire in my own way.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《著作权法修正案》中关于出租作品的研究
最近,在版权领域,关于雇佣作品的讨论再次开始,这是过去很多问题。此外,从修订后的法案以及文化、体育和旅游部的角度出发,在《版权法》草案中对出租作品作出了修正。作为《版权法》的基本原则“创作者原则”的唯一例外,雇佣作品将作者身份授予法人,而不是法人的雇员,这一点一直存在争议。在这种情况下,从著作权法修正案和文化体育观光部的角度来看,有必要在著作权法草案中提出关于雇佣作品的修正案,但目前还没有足够的内容来平息关于雇佣作品的争议。相信国内的许多学者已经对雇佣工作所引起的各种问题提出了有意义的建议。本文回顾了法哲学理论在出租作品方面的应用,并对韩国《著作权法》中关于出租作品的规定与国外相关立法进行了比较分析。此外,对以往研究者对出租作品的建议进行了分析和总结,并从修订法案和文化体育观光部的角度对著作权法草案进行了批判性的审查。在这方面,我就以我自己的方式进行雇佣工作的问题提出了需要修改的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Limitations on Granting Copyrights to AI-Generated Works and Alternative Protection Methodologies The Meaning and Content of Article 22, Paragraph 2 of the Constitution as a Standard for Constitutionality Review Determining Fair Use and the Role of Transformative Use Test: On the Rulings in Wofsy v. De Fontbrune Quo vadis, What will be the Future of Appropriation Art?: Focusing on “The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith” A Study on the Free Use of Public Works: Focused on the Seoul Central District Court’s 2019 Gadan 5207564 Decision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1