Woman-Centered Design through Humanity, Activism, and Inclusion

Teresa Almeida, Madeline Balaam, R. Comber
{"title":"Woman-Centered Design through Humanity, Activism, and Inclusion","authors":"Teresa Almeida, Madeline Balaam, R. Comber","doi":"10.1145/3397176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Women account for over half of the global population, however, continue to be subject to systematic and systemic disadvantage, particularly in terms of access to health and education. At every intersection, where systemic inequality accounts for greater loss of life or limitations on full and healthy living, women are more greatly impacted by those inequalities. The design of technologies is no different, the very definition of technology is historically cast in terms of male activities, and advancements in the field are critical to improve women's quality of life. This article views HCI, a relatively new field, as well positioned to act critically in the ways that technology serve, refigure, and redefine women's bodies. Indeed, the female body remains a contested topic, a restriction to the development of women's health. On one hand, the field of women's health has attended to the medicalization of the body and therefore is to be understood through medical language and knowledge. On the other hand, the framing of issues associated with women's health and people's experiences of and within such system(s) remain problematic for many. This is visible today in, e.g., socio-cultural practices in disparate geographies or medical devices within a clinic or the home. Moreover, the biological body is part of a great unmentionable, i.e., the perils of essentialism. We contend that it is necessary, pragmatically and ethically, for HCI to turn its attention toward a woman-centered design approach. While previous research has argued for the dangers of gender-demarcated design work, we advance that designing for and with women should not be regarded as ghettoizing, but instead as critical to improving women's experiences in bodily transactions, choices, rights, and access to and in health and care. In this article, we consider how and why designing with and for woman matters. We use our design-led research as a way to speak to and illustrate alternatives to designing for and with women within HCI.","PeriodicalId":322583,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3397176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Women account for over half of the global population, however, continue to be subject to systematic and systemic disadvantage, particularly in terms of access to health and education. At every intersection, where systemic inequality accounts for greater loss of life or limitations on full and healthy living, women are more greatly impacted by those inequalities. The design of technologies is no different, the very definition of technology is historically cast in terms of male activities, and advancements in the field are critical to improve women's quality of life. This article views HCI, a relatively new field, as well positioned to act critically in the ways that technology serve, refigure, and redefine women's bodies. Indeed, the female body remains a contested topic, a restriction to the development of women's health. On one hand, the field of women's health has attended to the medicalization of the body and therefore is to be understood through medical language and knowledge. On the other hand, the framing of issues associated with women's health and people's experiences of and within such system(s) remain problematic for many. This is visible today in, e.g., socio-cultural practices in disparate geographies or medical devices within a clinic or the home. Moreover, the biological body is part of a great unmentionable, i.e., the perils of essentialism. We contend that it is necessary, pragmatically and ethically, for HCI to turn its attention toward a woman-centered design approach. While previous research has argued for the dangers of gender-demarcated design work, we advance that designing for and with women should not be regarded as ghettoizing, but instead as critical to improving women's experiences in bodily transactions, choices, rights, and access to and in health and care. In this article, we consider how and why designing with and for woman matters. We use our design-led research as a way to speak to and illustrate alternatives to designing for and with women within HCI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以女性为中心的人性化、行动主义和包容性设计
然而,妇女占全球人口的一半以上,继续处于系统性和系统性的不利地位,特别是在获得保健和教育方面。在每一个交叉点,在系统性不平等造成更多生命损失或限制充分和健康生活的地方,妇女受到这些不平等的影响更大。技术的设计也不例外,技术的定义在历史上是根据男性的活动来定义的,该领域的进步对提高妇女的生活质量至关重要。这篇文章认为,HCI,一个相对较新的领域,以及定位,在技术服务,重塑和重新定义女性身体的方式发挥关键作用。事实上,女性身体仍然是一个有争议的话题,限制了妇女健康的发展。一方面,妇女健康领域涉及身体的医学化,因此需要通过医学语言和知识来理解。另一方面,对许多人来说,与妇女健康有关的问题以及人们在这种制度下和在这种制度内的经历仍然是问题。这在今天可以看到,例如,在不同地域的社会文化实践或诊所或家庭内的医疗设备。此外,生物的身体是一个巨大的不可提及的部分,即本质主义的危险。我们认为,从实用主义和道德上讲,HCI将注意力转向以女性为中心的设计方法是必要的。虽然之前的研究指出了性别划分设计工作的危险,但我们提出,为女性设计和与女性一起设计不应被视为种族隔离,而是对改善女性在身体交易、选择、权利和获得健康和护理方面的体验至关重要。在这篇文章中,我们将探讨与女性一起设计和为女性设计的重要性。我们用我们的设计为主导的研究作为一种方式来说话,并说明在HCI中为女性设计和与女性设计的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing PairBuddy—A Conversational Agent for Pair Programming Iteratively Designing Gesture Vocabularies: A Survey and Analysis of Best Practices in the HCI Literature Understanding HCI Practices and Challenges of Experiment Reporting with Brain Signals: Towards Reproducibility and Reuse Understanding, Addressing, and Analysing Digital Eye Strain in Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Displays It’s Complicated: The Relationship between User Trust, Model Accuracy and Explanations in AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1