The effects of Air Traffic Control sector design on the Solution Space Diagram

S. A. Rahman, M. Mulder, R. Paassen
{"title":"The effects of Air Traffic Control sector design on the Solution Space Diagram","authors":"S. A. Rahman, M. Mulder, R. Paassen","doi":"10.1145/1962300.1962354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motivation -- Traffic complexity and workload in Air Traffic Control (ATC) are important factors in the design of procedures and ATC sectors. The Solution Space Diagram (SSD), which shows all possible conflict-free vectors for aircraft, has been proposed as a tool for assessing sector complexity. When considering the SSD for an aircraft, each neighbouring aircraft introduces a zone of conflict, the Forbidden Beam Zone (FBZ) on the SSD. The changes in these FBZ are systematically studied to increase understanding of the SSD usability in reducing workload and managing sector complexity. Research approach -- The following sector variables are investigated in this research; the intercept angle of streams of aircraft, aircraft speed and aircraft horizontal proximity. Matlab® simulations of two aircraft conditions are set up for a number of case studies with different sector variables. These are then compared using quantitative analysis using the SSD. Findings -- In this study it is assumed that a denser Solution Space results in a higher rating for the complexity factor. The results show that in certain cases, where other variables are fixed to certain values, larger intercept angle and horizontal proximity produces a less dense Solution Space. Speed changes lead to other typical changes, as higher speeds result in the FBZ being shifted outwards on the SSD. Research limitations -- The findings regarding the relation between the complexity metric and sector design should be validated by means of an experiment, to obtain the opinion of professional Air Traffic Controllers (ATCos). Take away message -- Previous researches have introduced the Solution Space as a method to determine airspace complexity and therefore ATCo workload (Hermes et al., 2009; D'Engelbronner, 2009 and Mercado, 2009). This research extends these studies through exploring the effects of air traffic sector design in a systematic fashion.","PeriodicalId":115733,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","volume":"3 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1962300.1962354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Motivation -- Traffic complexity and workload in Air Traffic Control (ATC) are important factors in the design of procedures and ATC sectors. The Solution Space Diagram (SSD), which shows all possible conflict-free vectors for aircraft, has been proposed as a tool for assessing sector complexity. When considering the SSD for an aircraft, each neighbouring aircraft introduces a zone of conflict, the Forbidden Beam Zone (FBZ) on the SSD. The changes in these FBZ are systematically studied to increase understanding of the SSD usability in reducing workload and managing sector complexity. Research approach -- The following sector variables are investigated in this research; the intercept angle of streams of aircraft, aircraft speed and aircraft horizontal proximity. Matlab® simulations of two aircraft conditions are set up for a number of case studies with different sector variables. These are then compared using quantitative analysis using the SSD. Findings -- In this study it is assumed that a denser Solution Space results in a higher rating for the complexity factor. The results show that in certain cases, where other variables are fixed to certain values, larger intercept angle and horizontal proximity produces a less dense Solution Space. Speed changes lead to other typical changes, as higher speeds result in the FBZ being shifted outwards on the SSD. Research limitations -- The findings regarding the relation between the complexity metric and sector design should be validated by means of an experiment, to obtain the opinion of professional Air Traffic Controllers (ATCos). Take away message -- Previous researches have introduced the Solution Space as a method to determine airspace complexity and therefore ATCo workload (Hermes et al., 2009; D'Engelbronner, 2009 and Mercado, 2009). This research extends these studies through exploring the effects of air traffic sector design in a systematic fashion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空中交通管制部门设计对解空间图的影响
动机——空中交通管制(ATC)的交通复杂性和工作量是程序和ATC扇区设计的重要因素。解决方案空间图(SSD)显示了飞机所有可能的无冲突向量,已被提议作为评估扇区复杂性的工具。当考虑一架飞机的SSD时,每架相邻的飞机都会在SSD上引入一个冲突区域,即禁止波束区(Forbidden Beam zone, FBZ)。系统地研究了这些FBZ的变化,以增加对SSD在减少工作量和管理扇区复杂性方面的可用性的理解。研究方法——本研究调查了以下部门变量;飞机流的拦截角、飞机速度和飞机水平接近度。针对不同扇区变量的多个案例研究,设置了两种飞机条件的Matlab®模拟。然后使用SSD进行定量分析比较。发现——在本研究中,假设更密集的解决方案空间导致更高的复杂性因素评级。结果表明,在某些情况下,当其他变量固定为一定值时,较大的截距角和水平接近产生的解空间密度较小。速度的变化会导致其他典型的变化,因为更高的速度会导致FBZ在SSD上向外移动。研究局限性——关于复杂性度量和扇区设计之间关系的研究结果应该通过实验来验证,以获得专业空中交通管制员(ATCos)的意见。带走信息——之前的研究已经引入了解决方案空间作为确定空域复杂性的方法,从而确定ATCo工作量(Hermes等人,2009;D'Engelbronner, 2009; Mercado, 2009)。本研究以系统的方式探讨空中交通部门设计的影响,扩展了这些研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysing online social support between professionals Assessment of user needs for self-management services in coronary heart disease: a designerly approach Older adults' attitude towards a monitoring technology Embodiment in games: designing for children's well being The use of robots in social behavior tutoring for children with ASD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1