Relationalism and changes in international relations: An example of the influence of algorithmic power on the structure of everyday life and the emergence of national populism

Milos Vukelic
{"title":"Relationalism and changes in international relations: An example of the influence of algorithmic power on the structure of everyday life and the emergence of national populism","authors":"Milos Vukelic","doi":"10.2298/medjp2102284v","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper points out that there is a way to comprehend the phenomenon of\n national populism from the perspective of the international relations\n discipline. Additionally, to provide an interpretation of why national\n populism occurred in the United States and the European Union after 2014.\n The emergence of national populism in the United States and the European\n Union countries has endangered the survival of the liberal-democratic\n paradox. There are numerous scientific explanations attempting to explain\n how this phenomenon came about. In this paper, I will reduce these\n explanations to cultural, economic, and political arguments and arguments\n about human nature and the long-term logic of modernity. The author argues\n that these explanations have a research gap since there is no answer to why\n national populism occurred in 2014 simultaneously in the EU and the United\n States. As a set of tools in the international relations discipline, the\n author finds that relationalism provides us with lenses that can open up a\n space to claim that the simultaneous change, embodied in the emergence of\n national populism, occurred due to a change in the structure of the\n everyday. Therefore, the paper consists of an interdisciplinary literature\n review of relationalism in international relations, everyday nationalism,\n the influence of algorithmic power and algorithmic politics on the structure\n of human internet presence, and the existing works that indicate the source\n of national populism?s emergence. By proving the claims, the author points\n out the importance of studying processes in order to understand the events\n and changes in international relations that have occurred since 2014.","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp2102284v","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper points out that there is a way to comprehend the phenomenon of national populism from the perspective of the international relations discipline. Additionally, to provide an interpretation of why national populism occurred in the United States and the European Union after 2014. The emergence of national populism in the United States and the European Union countries has endangered the survival of the liberal-democratic paradox. There are numerous scientific explanations attempting to explain how this phenomenon came about. In this paper, I will reduce these explanations to cultural, economic, and political arguments and arguments about human nature and the long-term logic of modernity. The author argues that these explanations have a research gap since there is no answer to why national populism occurred in 2014 simultaneously in the EU and the United States. As a set of tools in the international relations discipline, the author finds that relationalism provides us with lenses that can open up a space to claim that the simultaneous change, embodied in the emergence of national populism, occurred due to a change in the structure of the everyday. Therefore, the paper consists of an interdisciplinary literature review of relationalism in international relations, everyday nationalism, the influence of algorithmic power and algorithmic politics on the structure of human internet presence, and the existing works that indicate the source of national populism?s emergence. By proving the claims, the author points out the importance of studying processes in order to understand the events and changes in international relations that have occurred since 2014.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关系主义与国际关系的变化:算法权力对日常生活结构的影响和国家民粹主义出现的一个例子
本文指出,从国际关系学科的角度来理解民族民粹主义现象是可行的。此外,对2014年后美国和欧盟出现民族民粹主义的原因进行了解释。在美国和欧盟国家,民族民粹主义的出现危及了自由-民主悖论的生存。有许多科学解释试图解释这种现象是如何产生的。在本文中,我将把这些解释归结为文化、经济和政治的争论,以及关于人性和现代性的长期逻辑的争论。作者认为,这些解释存在研究空白,因为欧盟和美国在2014年同时出现民族民粹主义的原因没有答案。作为国际关系学科中的一套工具,作者发现,关系主义为我们提供了一个镜头,可以打开一个空间,让我们声称,以民族民粹主义的出现为代表的同步变化是由于日常结构的变化而发生的。因此,本文将对国际关系中的关系主义、日常民族主义、算法权力和算法政治对人类网络存在结构的影响,以及表明民族民粹主义来源的现有著作进行跨学科的文献综述。年代出现。通过证明这些说法,作者指出了研究过程的重要性,以便了解2014年以来发生的国际关系事件和变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The roots of the idea of humanitarian intervention in De Iure Belli ac Pacis by Hugo Grotius The prospects of U.S.-Russian relations in the light of war in Ukraine: “Containment 2.0.” The sword of Damocles in global stability China’s 21st century geopolitics and geo-economics: An evidence from the Western Balkans The crisis of democracy in Eastern Europe: (un)successful political integration of new members?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1