Takings Constraints: Mechanisms to Minimize the Uncompensated Increment and Limit the Government's Power to Take Property

Colin Parent
{"title":"Takings Constraints: Mechanisms to Minimize the Uncompensated Increment and Limit the Government's Power to Take Property","authors":"Colin Parent","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1131795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The breadth of takings scholarship has left useful ideas diluted amongst an ocean of theories. This article addresses that problem by creating a clear and useful taxonomy for takings constraints by which takings theories can be categorized and analyzed. These new categories are (1) compensatory restraints on how much government must compensate property owners, (2) categorical constraints which absolutely limit which property can be taken and for what purposes, and (3) processes constraints which limit how property is condemned. Furthermore, this article suggests that compensatory restraints are appropriate to minimize economic harms, and categorical constraints are only appropriate to minimize the destruction of property owners' autonomy. This new theory is only possible with the use of the new taxonomy to describe takings constraints. This paper does not attempt to argue which interests of property should be protected - a topic already developed in the scholarship. However, its new theory provides a framework for policymakers to apply when deciding what takings constraints to use when seeking to advance their substantive values in property, whatever those values may be.","PeriodicalId":367470,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy (Topic)","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1131795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The breadth of takings scholarship has left useful ideas diluted amongst an ocean of theories. This article addresses that problem by creating a clear and useful taxonomy for takings constraints by which takings theories can be categorized and analyzed. These new categories are (1) compensatory restraints on how much government must compensate property owners, (2) categorical constraints which absolutely limit which property can be taken and for what purposes, and (3) processes constraints which limit how property is condemned. Furthermore, this article suggests that compensatory restraints are appropriate to minimize economic harms, and categorical constraints are only appropriate to minimize the destruction of property owners' autonomy. This new theory is only possible with the use of the new taxonomy to describe takings constraints. This paper does not attempt to argue which interests of property should be protected - a topic already developed in the scholarship. However, its new theory provides a framework for policymakers to apply when deciding what takings constraints to use when seeking to advance their substantive values in property, whatever those values may be.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
征收约束:减少无偿增量和限制政府征收财产权力的机制
学术研究的广度使得有用的思想被淹没在理论的海洋中。本文通过为征收约束创建一个清晰而有用的分类法来解决这个问题,通过这个分类法可以对征收理论进行分类和分析。这些新类别是:(1)对政府必须补偿财产所有者多少的补偿性限制,(2)绝对限制哪些财产可以被拿走以及用于什么目的的绝对限制,以及(3)限制财产如何被定罪的过程限制。此外,本文认为补偿性约束适用于最小化经济损害,而分类约束只适用于最小化对财产所有者自主权的破坏。这个新理论只有在使用新的分类法来描述征收限制时才有可能。本文并不试图争论哪些财产利益应该受到保护——这是学术界已经提出的一个话题。然而,它的新理论为政策制定者提供了一个框架,当他们在寻求提高财产的实质性价值时,无论这些价值是什么,他们都可以决定使用哪些征收限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Politically Connected Boards of Directors and the Allocation of Procurement Contracts Preference Monotonicity and Information Aggregation in Elections Role Conflict: Society's Dilemma with Excellence in Marketing The Structural Transformation as a Pathway Out of Poverty: Analytics, Empirics and Politics Korean Institutional Reform in Comparative Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1