Tre pointer fra Grue-Sørensen til nutidens pædagogik

Per Fibæk Laursen
{"title":"Tre pointer fra Grue-Sørensen til nutidens pædagogik","authors":"Per Fibæk Laursen","doi":"10.7146/SPF.V7I1.102698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When K. Grue-Sørensen became a professor of pedagogy at the University of Copenhagen in 1955, he was inline with the dominant historical-hermeneutical approach to humanities. From the late 1960s until retirementin 1974, his approach was challenged by both technical and critical alternatives. Both these alternative havesince grown steadily, while the historical-hermeneutical view has been in the defensive. But Grue-Sørensenand the tradition he represented have three signifi cant points for today’s pedagogy, whether it is technicalor critical: pedagogy can and should not deliver effi ciency technology, pedagogy should as far as possible useeveryday language, and fi nally that the educational history can make us wiser.","PeriodicalId":256798,"journal":{"name":"Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/SPF.V7I1.102698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When K. Grue-Sørensen became a professor of pedagogy at the University of Copenhagen in 1955, he was inline with the dominant historical-hermeneutical approach to humanities. From the late 1960s until retirementin 1974, his approach was challenged by both technical and critical alternatives. Both these alternative havesince grown steadily, while the historical-hermeneutical view has been in the defensive. But Grue-Sørensenand the tradition he represented have three signifi cant points for today’s pedagogy, whether it is technicalor critical: pedagogy can and should not deliver effi ciency technology, pedagogy should as far as possible useeveryday language, and fi nally that the educational history can make us wiser.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当K.格鲁伊-索伦森于1955年成为哥本哈根大学的教育学教授时,他与人文学科的主流历史解释学方法是一致的。从20世纪60年代末到1974年退休,他的方法受到了技术和关键替代方案的挑战。这两种观点都在稳步发展,而历史解释学观点则处于守势。但是格吕森和他所代表的传统对于今天的教育学,无论是技术性的还是批判性的,都有三个重要的意义:教育学可以也不应该提供高效的技术,教育学应该尽可能使用日常语言,最后,教育史可以让我们更聪明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Profylaksens "pædagogik" Introduction to post-coronial education theme Hur för man samtal? Om den almene pædagogiks krise Den utidige kedsomhed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1