Acute effects of breathing exercises on diaphragmatic mobility and respiratory muscles activity in healthy adults

Maryne Ramos da Siva, Catherine Corrêa Peruzzolo, Jéssica Canizelli, Dayane Montemezzo, E. Paulin
{"title":"Acute effects of breathing exercises on diaphragmatic mobility and respiratory muscles activity in healthy adults","authors":"Maryne Ramos da Siva, Catherine Corrêa Peruzzolo, Jéssica Canizelli, Dayane Montemezzo, E. Paulin","doi":"10.4322/2675-9977.cpcr.42701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective : To investigate the differences between the breathing exercises sniff inspiration (SI), diaphragmatic breathing (DB), fractionated breaths (FB) and breathing from functional residual capacity (BFRC) in terms of their effect on diaphragmatic mobility and electrical activity of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) and anterior scalene muscles in healthy adults in two positions: sitting and supported 30° trunk inclination. Methods : In a cross-sectional observational research, healthy adults of both sexes were recruited. Participants underwent anthropometric and spirometric assessment and their vital signs were measured. Diaphragmatic mobility (DM) was analyzed by ultrasound (US). Electrical activity of the sternocleidomastoid and anterior scalene muscles was assessed by electromyography (EM), in two positions: sitting and supported 30° trunk inclination. Results : A total of 30 individuals were assessed, 14 women and 16 men. Among the exercises studied, respiratory muscles were least used in DB for both positions and most used in BFRC. In regard to DM, the exercise that mobilized the diaphragm the most was BFRC in both studied positions, while DB caused the least mobilization of this muscle. Diaphragmatic mobility declined during trunk inclination at 30° and respiratory muscle electrical activity was lower when compared to the sitting position. Conclusion : In clinical practice, diaphragmatic breathing proved to be the exercise that least used the respiratory muscles. However, the BFRC with a 30° trunk inclination is the most recommended exercise when the objective is the mobilization of the diaphragm. It is important to know the muscle action during breathing exercises for a better prescription.","PeriodicalId":164984,"journal":{"name":"Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy, Critical Care and Rehabilitation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy, Critical Care and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4322/2675-9977.cpcr.42701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective : To investigate the differences between the breathing exercises sniff inspiration (SI), diaphragmatic breathing (DB), fractionated breaths (FB) and breathing from functional residual capacity (BFRC) in terms of their effect on diaphragmatic mobility and electrical activity of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) and anterior scalene muscles in healthy adults in two positions: sitting and supported 30° trunk inclination. Methods : In a cross-sectional observational research, healthy adults of both sexes were recruited. Participants underwent anthropometric and spirometric assessment and their vital signs were measured. Diaphragmatic mobility (DM) was analyzed by ultrasound (US). Electrical activity of the sternocleidomastoid and anterior scalene muscles was assessed by electromyography (EM), in two positions: sitting and supported 30° trunk inclination. Results : A total of 30 individuals were assessed, 14 women and 16 men. Among the exercises studied, respiratory muscles were least used in DB for both positions and most used in BFRC. In regard to DM, the exercise that mobilized the diaphragm the most was BFRC in both studied positions, while DB caused the least mobilization of this muscle. Diaphragmatic mobility declined during trunk inclination at 30° and respiratory muscle electrical activity was lower when compared to the sitting position. Conclusion : In clinical practice, diaphragmatic breathing proved to be the exercise that least used the respiratory muscles. However, the BFRC with a 30° trunk inclination is the most recommended exercise when the objective is the mobilization of the diaphragm. It is important to know the muscle action during breathing exercises for a better prescription.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼吸练习对健康成人膈肌活动和呼吸肌活动的急性影响
目的:探讨健康成人坐位和躯干倾斜30°时,嗅吸气(SI)、膈呼吸(DB)、分次呼吸(FB)和功能剩余量呼吸(BFRC)对膈肌活动度和胸锁乳突肌(SCM)及前斜角肌电活动的影响。方法:在一项横断面观察研究中,招募了健康的男女成年人。研究人员对参与者进行了人体测量和肺活量测定,并测量了他们的生命体征。超声(US)分析膈肌活动度(DM)。通过肌电图(EM)评估胸锁乳突肌和前斜角肌在两种姿势下的电活动:坐姿和支撑30°躯干倾斜。结果:共有30人被评估,14名女性和16名男性。在研究的运动中,呼吸肌在两种体位中使用最少,而在BFRC中使用最多。对于DM,在两种体位中,最能调动膈肌的运动是BFRC,而DB对膈肌的调动最少。躯干倾斜30°时,膈肌活动度下降,呼吸肌电活动低于坐位。结论:在临床实践中,横膈膜呼吸被证明是使用呼吸肌最少的运动。然而,当目标是动员膈肌时,最推荐的运动是躯干倾斜30°的BFRC。重要的是要知道呼吸练习中的肌肉活动,以获得更好的处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of heart rate variability and accelerometry in patients following surgery for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer In-hospital mobilization after cardiac surgery: investigation of a dose-effect of once- and twice-daily exercise on cardiac autonomic modulation Can diaphragmatic mobility be measured by chest wall volumes? Disease-related knowledge, health behaviours and clinical outcomes following an educational intervention in patients with diabetes according to their health literacy level: a systematic review Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy, Critical Care and Rehabilitation (CPCR) journal: a new source of scientific knowledge for physiotherapy clinicians and researchers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1