Teaching collaborative writing and peer review techniques to engineering and technology undergraduates

S. Nelson
{"title":"Teaching collaborative writing and peer review techniques to engineering and technology undergraduates","authors":"S. Nelson","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2000.896636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A recent survey of engineering professionals found that they spent 44% of their time writing, and almost all sometimes wrote as members of a team. Yet E&T students, who typically struggle with writing tasks, generally write as individuals and are evaluated only by their professors. This paper discusses a rationale and methods to provide students with experience in writing collaboratively and critiquing one another's writing. I argue that collaborative writing promotes active learning and provides students with experience working as part of a team. Peer review gives students experience in critical thinking and promotes editorial skills. These classroom techniques raise students' comfort level at having their work evaluated by others in a professional setting. Course evaluation feedback and follow-up surveying confirm that students who complete the course are more likely to write collaboratively in future courses, and students report that they will seek collaborative writing opportunities in the workplace.","PeriodicalId":371740,"journal":{"name":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.896636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

A recent survey of engineering professionals found that they spent 44% of their time writing, and almost all sometimes wrote as members of a team. Yet E&T students, who typically struggle with writing tasks, generally write as individuals and are evaluated only by their professors. This paper discusses a rationale and methods to provide students with experience in writing collaboratively and critiquing one another's writing. I argue that collaborative writing promotes active learning and provides students with experience working as part of a team. Peer review gives students experience in critical thinking and promotes editorial skills. These classroom techniques raise students' comfort level at having their work evaluated by others in a professional setting. Course evaluation feedback and follow-up surveying confirm that students who complete the course are more likely to write collaboratively in future courses, and students report that they will seek collaborative writing opportunities in the workplace.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向工程和技术本科生教授合作写作和同行评议技巧
最近一项针对工程专业人士的调查发现,他们将44%的时间用于写作,而且几乎所有人有时都是作为团队成员写作。然而,E&T的学生通常在写作任务上挣扎,他们通常是单独写作,只由他们的教授来评估。本文探讨了为学生提供合作写作和相互批评的经验的基本原理和方法。我认为合作写作促进了主动学习,并为学生提供了作为团队一部分的工作经验。同行评议给学生批判性思维的经验,并提高编辑技能。这些课堂技巧提高了学生在专业环境下接受他人评估的舒适度。课程评估反馈和后续调查证实,完成课程的学生更有可能在未来的课程中进行合作写作,学生们报告说他们将在工作场所寻求合作写作的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Design TASC Engineering Design Competition: a ten-year perspective Concept questions for improved learning and outcome assessment in statics Different is good: barriers to retention for women in software engineering What are we really evaluating? Building the next generation of high performance computing researchers in engineering and science: the NCSA/ARL MSRC PET summer internship program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1