Anti-Scientific Currents in American Thought

C. Kowalski, Adam J Mrdjenovich
{"title":"Anti-Scientific Currents in American Thought","authors":"C. Kowalski, Adam J Mrdjenovich","doi":"10.22158/JRPH.V2N1P15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multifarious forces have surrounded science and continue their—sometimes separate, sometimes coordinated—attempts to supplant a scientific approach to an explanation of important questions about us and the world we inhabit. We focus here on questions pertaining to biology and medicine, but no aspect of the scientific enterprise is immune from attack; and not all of the forces aligned against it are represented. The ones considered are: religion, neoliberalism, postmodernism, the “back-to-nature” movement, bioethical obstructionism, and the current POTUS, Donald Trump. We sit in amazement that at the amount of vitriol that has been leveled at science, but try to maintain civility in response. We would be irenic, not polemic; promoting true dialogue between respected scholars holding somewhat differing views. This is not as difficult as some would have you believe.","PeriodicalId":229607,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Philosophy and History","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Philosophy and History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/JRPH.V2N1P15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multifarious forces have surrounded science and continue their—sometimes separate, sometimes coordinated—attempts to supplant a scientific approach to an explanation of important questions about us and the world we inhabit. We focus here on questions pertaining to biology and medicine, but no aspect of the scientific enterprise is immune from attack; and not all of the forces aligned against it are represented. The ones considered are: religion, neoliberalism, postmodernism, the “back-to-nature” movement, bioethical obstructionism, and the current POTUS, Donald Trump. We sit in amazement that at the amount of vitriol that has been leveled at science, but try to maintain civility in response. We would be irenic, not polemic; promoting true dialogue between respected scholars holding somewhat differing views. This is not as difficult as some would have you believe.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国思想中的反科学思潮
各种各样的力量包围着科学,并继续(有时是各自为伍,有时是协调一致)试图取代科学方法来解释有关我们和我们所居住的世界的重要问题。我们在这里集中讨论与生物学和医学有关的问题,但科学事业的任何方面都不能免于攻击;并不是所有反对它的力量都有代表。这些问题包括:宗教、新自由主义、后现代主义、“回归自然”运动、生物伦理阻挠以及现任美国总统唐纳德·特朗普。我们惊讶地坐在那里,看着人们对科学的尖刻批评,但我们仍努力保持礼貌的回应。我们将是讽刺,而不是争论;促进持不同观点的受人尊敬的学者之间的真正对话。这并不像有些人想让你相信的那么难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Marx’s Riddle Metaphor about History: Based on the Discussion of “The Riddle of History” Misconceptions Created by Tulodziecki’s Revisionist Account of Semmelweis’s Theory and Reasoning in the Philosophy of Science Literature Within the Space of Drawing: Lines and the Locus of Creation in Architectural Design Turing Machine Halting Problem, Russell’s Paradox and Gödel Incompleteness Theorem Artificial Intelligence as a Substitute for Human Creativity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1