Within the Space of Drawing: Lines and the Locus of Creation in Architectural Design

Otto Paans
{"title":"Within the Space of Drawing: Lines and the Locus of Creation in Architectural Design","authors":"Otto Paans","doi":"10.22158/jrph.v7n1p36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers the practice of drawing lines in the context of architectural design. The core argument is that drawing lines generates the conditions for creative thought. Moreover, this initial claim is discussed in the context of the creative process in architectural design, as lines play an indispensable role in the locus of creation. First, the so-called “representational paradigm” about hand drawing is critically discussed, leading to the exposition of a new philosophical account regarding drawing. This new position consists of three theses: (I) it regards the drawing surface as a topos or “space of drawing”; (II) it regards drawings as situated figurations; (III) and it regards lines as processes. Jointly, these three theses form the “performative paradigm”, casting each aspect of the drawing process in terms of an unfolding dynamic in which inhabitative imagination and aesthetic sensibility play decisive roles. Lastly, these conclusions are formalized in a design model.","PeriodicalId":229607,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Philosophy and History","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Philosophy and History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/jrph.v7n1p36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper considers the practice of drawing lines in the context of architectural design. The core argument is that drawing lines generates the conditions for creative thought. Moreover, this initial claim is discussed in the context of the creative process in architectural design, as lines play an indispensable role in the locus of creation. First, the so-called “representational paradigm” about hand drawing is critically discussed, leading to the exposition of a new philosophical account regarding drawing. This new position consists of three theses: (I) it regards the drawing surface as a topos or “space of drawing”; (II) it regards drawings as situated figurations; (III) and it regards lines as processes. Jointly, these three theses form the “performative paradigm”, casting each aspect of the drawing process in terms of an unfolding dynamic in which inhabitative imagination and aesthetic sensibility play decisive roles. Lastly, these conclusions are formalized in a design model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在绘画空间内:建筑设计中的线条与创作中心
本文探讨了在建筑设计中绘制线条的做法。其核心论点是,画线为创造性思维创造了条件。此外,本文还结合建筑设计的创作过程讨论了这一初步主张,因为线条在创作中扮演着不可或缺的角色。首先,对关于手绘的所谓 "表现范式 "进行了批判性讨论,从而阐述了关于绘画的新哲学观点。这一新的立场包括三个论点:(I) 将素描表面视为拓扑或 "素描空间";(II) 将素描视为情景具象;(III) 将线条视为过程。这三个论点共同构成了 "表演范式",将绘画过程的每个方面都视为一个不断发展的动态过程,在这个过程中,居住想象力和审美感知力发挥着决定性的作用。最后,这些结论被形式化为一个设计模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Marx’s Riddle Metaphor about History: Based on the Discussion of “The Riddle of History” Misconceptions Created by Tulodziecki’s Revisionist Account of Semmelweis’s Theory and Reasoning in the Philosophy of Science Literature Within the Space of Drawing: Lines and the Locus of Creation in Architectural Design Turing Machine Halting Problem, Russell’s Paradox and Gödel Incompleteness Theorem Artificial Intelligence as a Substitute for Human Creativity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1