Robert Schumann, Serious Virtuosity, and the Rhetoric of the Sublime

A. Stefaniak
{"title":"Robert Schumann, Serious Virtuosity, and the Rhetoric of the Sublime","authors":"A. Stefaniak","doi":"10.1525/JM.2016.33.4.433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In several essays from the first half of the nineteenth century, Robert Schumann and other music critics used the rhetoric of the sublime when describing select, unconventionally intense virtuosic showpieces and performances, evoking this category’s associations with overpowering, even fearsome experiences and heroic human qualities. These writings formed one strand of a larger discourse in which musicians and critics attempted to describe and identify instances of virtuosity that supposedly rejected superficiality and aimed at serious aesthetic values: in the nineteenth-century imagination, the sublime abnegated mere sensuous pleasure; inspired a mixture of attraction, admiration, and trepidation; and implied both masculinity and intellectual cultivation. It offered a framework for self-consciously elevating virtuosity rooted in the sheer intensity and, in some cases, perceived inaccessibility of particular works and performances. Schumann extended the mantle of sublimity to Liszt during the virtuoso’s 1840 Leipzig and Dresden concerts. Critics described three of Schumann’s own 1830s piano showpieces using the rhetoric of the sublime, comparing the finale of the Concert sans orchestre , Op. 14, to violent forces of nature to illustrate the way its virtuosic passagework disrupts and engulfs lyrical themes within an anomalous formal structure. They also linked the Toccata, Op. 7, and Etudes symphoniques , Op. 13, to Beethoven, hinting at the ways in which Schumann alluded to or modeled these showpieces on Beethoven symphonies. These episodes in Schumann’s career broaden our understanding of the contexts in which nineteenth-century writers on music evoked the sublime, showing how they described this quality not only in symphonies and large choral works but also in solo performances and showpieces. They illuminate the politics of the sublime, revealing its significance for nineteenth-century thinking about the cultural prestige that particular musical works and performances could attain.","PeriodicalId":413730,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Musicology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Musicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/JM.2016.33.4.433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In several essays from the first half of the nineteenth century, Robert Schumann and other music critics used the rhetoric of the sublime when describing select, unconventionally intense virtuosic showpieces and performances, evoking this category’s associations with overpowering, even fearsome experiences and heroic human qualities. These writings formed one strand of a larger discourse in which musicians and critics attempted to describe and identify instances of virtuosity that supposedly rejected superficiality and aimed at serious aesthetic values: in the nineteenth-century imagination, the sublime abnegated mere sensuous pleasure; inspired a mixture of attraction, admiration, and trepidation; and implied both masculinity and intellectual cultivation. It offered a framework for self-consciously elevating virtuosity rooted in the sheer intensity and, in some cases, perceived inaccessibility of particular works and performances. Schumann extended the mantle of sublimity to Liszt during the virtuoso’s 1840 Leipzig and Dresden concerts. Critics described three of Schumann’s own 1830s piano showpieces using the rhetoric of the sublime, comparing the finale of the Concert sans orchestre , Op. 14, to violent forces of nature to illustrate the way its virtuosic passagework disrupts and engulfs lyrical themes within an anomalous formal structure. They also linked the Toccata, Op. 7, and Etudes symphoniques , Op. 13, to Beethoven, hinting at the ways in which Schumann alluded to or modeled these showpieces on Beethoven symphonies. These episodes in Schumann’s career broaden our understanding of the contexts in which nineteenth-century writers on music evoked the sublime, showing how they described this quality not only in symphonies and large choral works but also in solo performances and showpieces. They illuminate the politics of the sublime, revealing its significance for nineteenth-century thinking about the cultural prestige that particular musical works and performances could attain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗伯特·舒曼:《严肃的技艺与崇高的修辞》
在19世纪上半叶的几篇文章中,罗伯特·舒曼(Robert Schumann)和其他音乐评论家在描述精选的、非传统的、激烈的艺术表演和表演时,使用了崇高的修辞,唤起了这一类别与压倒性的、甚至可怕的经历和英雄般的人类品质的联系。这些作品构成了一个更大的话语的一部分,音乐家和评论家试图描述和识别精湛的实例,据说拒绝肤浅,瞄准严肃的审美价值:在19世纪的想象中,崇高否定了单纯的感官快感;引起了吸引、钦佩和恐惧的混合;暗示着男子气概和智力修养。它提供了一个框架,让人们自觉地提升精湛的技艺,这种技艺植根于纯粹的强度,在某些情况下,人们会觉得某些作品和表演难以接近。舒曼在李斯特1840年在莱比锡和德累斯顿的音乐会上把他的崇高精神发扬光大。评论家们用崇高的修辞来描述舒曼在19世纪30年代创作的三首钢琴作品,将《无管弦乐音乐会》(Op. 14)的终曲与大自然的暴力力量进行比较,以说明其精湛的通道是如何在反常的形式结构中破坏和吞没抒情主题的。他们还将托卡塔交响曲(Op. 7)和练习曲交响曲(Op. 13)与贝多芬联系起来,暗示舒曼以贝多芬交响曲的方式暗示或模仿这些展示作品。舒曼职业生涯中的这些片段拓宽了我们对19世纪音乐作家唤起崇高的背景的理解,展示了他们如何不仅在交响乐和大型合唱作品中描述这种品质,而且在独奏和表演中也描述了这种品质。它们阐明了崇高的政治,揭示了它对19世纪思考特定音乐作品和表演可能获得的文化声望的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Powerful Sounds for Troubled Times Extreme Vocality and the Boundaries of Song in the Medieval Crusades Musical Sociability, Atlantic Slavery, and the Portraiture of Carmontelle The “Economy of Incarnation” and the Cherubic Hymn in Nineteenth-Century Russia Séances, “Sperrits,” and Self-Playing Accordions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1