Dialog religii z nauką wyzwaniem dla chrześcijaństwa

S. Leciejewski
{"title":"Dialog religii z nauką wyzwaniem dla chrześcijaństwa","authors":"S. Leciejewski","doi":"10.14746/cis.2022.54.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \nSource literature lists several versions of creationism as well as numerous manners of understand- ing evolutionism. Creationist views may be limited to four basic ones: fundamentalist creationism, creation science, intelligent design and evolutionary creationism. In my article I will justify which of these versions of creationism may be considered as dialoguing with science, and which of them turn out, to a greater or lesser degree, unable to enter into this dialogue. I will answer the question how creationism should be understood in order for it to be able to engage in a debate with modern science. In other words, the central question of this article will be: how is the dialogue between religion (creationism) and science (evolutionism) feasible? \n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":444061,"journal":{"name":"Człowiek i Społeczeństwo","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Człowiek i Społeczeństwo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/cis.2022.54.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Source literature lists several versions of creationism as well as numerous manners of understand- ing evolutionism. Creationist views may be limited to four basic ones: fundamentalist creationism, creation science, intelligent design and evolutionary creationism. In my article I will justify which of these versions of creationism may be considered as dialoguing with science, and which of them turn out, to a greater or lesser degree, unable to enter into this dialogue. I will answer the question how creationism should be understood in order for it to be able to engage in a debate with modern science. In other words, the central question of this article will be: how is the dialogue between religion (creationism) and science (evolutionism) feasible?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原始文献列出了几个版本的神创论,以及许多理解进化论的方式。神创论的观点可能仅限于四个基本的:原教旨主义神创论,创造科学,智能设计和进化神创论。在我的文章中,我将证明哪些版本的神创论可以被认为是与科学对话,哪些版本在或多或少的程度上无法进入这种对话。我将回答如何理解神创论的问题,以便它能够与现代科学进行辩论。换句话说,本文的中心问题将是:宗教(神创论)和科学(进化论)之间的对话如何可行?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wprowadzenie redaktorów tomu. Inspiracja i zaproszenie do dyskusji o socjologii miasta Tożsamość społeczno-przestrzenna miasta satelitarnego. Przykład Lubonia koło Poznania Psychologiczne uwarunkowania przywiązania do miejsca: zaufanie społeczne, styl przywiązania i lęk. Badanie longitudinalne w okresie pandemii COVID-19 Uważność a radzenie sobie ze stresem u kobiet i mężczyzn Kapitał społeczny miasta globalizującego się. Studium przypadku Krakowa i Poznania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1