A Survey on the Current Status and Future Challenges Towards Objective Skills Assessment in Endovascular Surgery

E. Mazomenos, Ping-Lin Chang, A. Rolls, D. Hawkes, C. Bicknell, E. V. Poorten, C. Riga, A. Desjardins, D. Stoyanov
{"title":"A Survey on the Current Status and Future Challenges Towards Objective Skills Assessment in Endovascular Surgery","authors":"E. Mazomenos, Ping-Lin Chang, A. Rolls, D. Hawkes, C. Bicknell, E. V. Poorten, C. Riga, A. Desjardins, D. Stoyanov","doi":"10.1142/S2424905X16400109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Minimally invasive endovascular interventions have evolved rapidly over the past decade, facilitated by breakthroughs in medical imaging and sensing, instrumentation and most recently robotics. Catheter-based operations are potentially safer and applicable to a wider patient population due to the reduced comorbidity. As a result endovascular surgery has become the preferred treatment option for conditions previously treated with open surgery and as such the number of patients undergoing endovascular interventions is increasing every year. This fact coupled with a proclivity for reduced working hours results in a requirement for efficient training and assessment of new surgeons, that deviates from the “see one, do one, teach one” model introduced by William Halsted, so that trainees obtain operational expertise in a shorter period. Developing more objective assessment tools based on quantitative metrics is now a recognized need in interventional training and this manuscript reports the current literature for endovascular skills assessment and the associated emerging technologies. A systematic search was performed on PubMed (MEDLINE), Google Scholar, IEEXplore and known journals using the keywords, “endovascular surgery”, “surgical skills”, “endovascular skills”, “surgical training endovascular” and “catheter skills”. Focusing explicitly on endovascular surgical skills, we group related works into three categories based on the metrics used; structured scales and checklists, simulation-based and motion-based metrics. This review highlights the key findings in each category and also provides suggestions for new research opportunities towards fully objective and automated surgical assessment solutions.","PeriodicalId":447761,"journal":{"name":"J. Medical Robotics Res.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Medical Robotics Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424905X16400109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Minimally invasive endovascular interventions have evolved rapidly over the past decade, facilitated by breakthroughs in medical imaging and sensing, instrumentation and most recently robotics. Catheter-based operations are potentially safer and applicable to a wider patient population due to the reduced comorbidity. As a result endovascular surgery has become the preferred treatment option for conditions previously treated with open surgery and as such the number of patients undergoing endovascular interventions is increasing every year. This fact coupled with a proclivity for reduced working hours results in a requirement for efficient training and assessment of new surgeons, that deviates from the “see one, do one, teach one” model introduced by William Halsted, so that trainees obtain operational expertise in a shorter period. Developing more objective assessment tools based on quantitative metrics is now a recognized need in interventional training and this manuscript reports the current literature for endovascular skills assessment and the associated emerging technologies. A systematic search was performed on PubMed (MEDLINE), Google Scholar, IEEXplore and known journals using the keywords, “endovascular surgery”, “surgical skills”, “endovascular skills”, “surgical training endovascular” and “catheter skills”. Focusing explicitly on endovascular surgical skills, we group related works into three categories based on the metrics used; structured scales and checklists, simulation-based and motion-based metrics. This review highlights the key findings in each category and also provides suggestions for new research opportunities towards fully objective and automated surgical assessment solutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血管内外科客观技能评价的现状及未来挑战
在过去十年中,由于医学成像和传感、仪器仪表以及最近的机器人技术的突破,微创血管内介入技术发展迅速。基于导管的手术可能更安全,并且由于减少了合并症而适用于更广泛的患者群体。因此,血管内手术已成为先前以开放手术治疗的疾病的首选治疗选择,因此,接受血管内介入治疗的患者数量每年都在增加。这一事实与减少工作时间的倾向相结合,导致对新外科医生进行有效培训和评估的需求,这偏离了威廉·霍尔斯特德(William Halsted)提出的“看一个,做一个,教一个”模式,以便学员在更短的时间内获得操作专业知识。基于定量指标开发更客观的评估工具是介入训练中公认的需求,本文报告了血管内技能评估和相关新兴技术的当前文献。系统检索PubMed (MEDLINE)、Google Scholar、IEEXplore及已知期刊,检索关键词为“endovascular surgery”、“surgical skills”、“endovascular skills”、“surgical training endovascular”、“catheter skills”。明确关注血管内手术技能,我们根据使用的指标将相关工作分为三类;结构化的尺度和清单,基于模拟和基于动作的指标。这篇综述强调了每个类别的关键发现,并为实现完全客观和自动化的手术评估解决方案提供了新的研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calibration and Evaluation of a Motion Measurement System for PET Imaging Studies Automatic Detection of Out-of-body Frames in Surgical Videos for Privacy Protection Using Self-supervised Learning and Minimal Labels A Novel Mechanical Design of a Wearable Fingertip Haptic Device for Remote Meniscus Palpation A Surgical Robotic Framework for Safe and Autonomous Data-Driven Learning and Manipulation of an Unknown Deformable Tissue with an Integrated Critical Space Development and Testing of a Durable and Novel Breast Phantom for Robotic Autonomous Ultrasound Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1