Using eye tracking to investigate graph layout effects

Weidong Huang
{"title":"Using eye tracking to investigate graph layout effects","authors":"Weidong Huang","doi":"10.1109/APVIS.2007.329282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Graphs are typically visualized as node-link diagrams. Although there is a fair amount of research focusing on crossing minimization to improve readability, little attention has been paid on how to handle crossings when they are an essential part of the final visualizations. This requires us to understand how people read graphs and how crossings affect reading performance. As an initial step to this end, a preliminary eye tracking experiment was conducted. The specific purpose of this experiment was to test the effects of crossing angles and geometric-path tendency on eye movements and performance. Sixteen subjects performed both path search and node locating tasks with six drawings. The results showed that small angles can slow down and trigger extra eye movements, causing delays for path search tasks, whereas crossings have little impact on node locating tasks. Geometric-path tendency indicates that a path between two nodes can become harder to follow when many branches of the path go toward the target node. The insights obtained are discussed with a view to further confirmation in future work.","PeriodicalId":136557,"journal":{"name":"2007 6th International Asia-Pacific Symposium on Visualization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"125","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 6th International Asia-Pacific Symposium on Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APVIS.2007.329282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 125

Abstract

Graphs are typically visualized as node-link diagrams. Although there is a fair amount of research focusing on crossing minimization to improve readability, little attention has been paid on how to handle crossings when they are an essential part of the final visualizations. This requires us to understand how people read graphs and how crossings affect reading performance. As an initial step to this end, a preliminary eye tracking experiment was conducted. The specific purpose of this experiment was to test the effects of crossing angles and geometric-path tendency on eye movements and performance. Sixteen subjects performed both path search and node locating tasks with six drawings. The results showed that small angles can slow down and trigger extra eye movements, causing delays for path search tasks, whereas crossings have little impact on node locating tasks. Geometric-path tendency indicates that a path between two nodes can become harder to follow when many branches of the path go toward the target node. The insights obtained are discussed with a view to further confirmation in future work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用眼动追踪研究图形布局效果
图形通常被可视化为节点链接图。虽然有相当多的研究集中在交叉点最小化以提高可读性,但很少有人关注如何处理交叉点,当它们是最终可视化的重要组成部分时。这需要我们了解人们是如何阅读图表的,以及交叉是如何影响阅读表现的。为此,我们进行了初步的眼动追踪实验。本实验的具体目的是测试交叉角度和几何路径倾向对眼球运动和表现的影响。16名受试者同时执行路径搜索和节点定位任务。结果表明,小角度会减慢并触发额外的眼球运动,导致路径搜索任务的延迟,而交叉对节点定位任务的影响很小。几何路径趋势表明,当路径的许多分支都指向目标节点时,两个节点之间的路径可能变得难以跟踪。讨论了所得的见解,以期在今后的工作中进一步证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visualization and analysis of email networks Particle-based volume rendering A comparison of vertex ordering algorithms for large graph visualization Straight-line grid drawings of planar graphs with linear area Force-directed drawing method for intersecting clustered graphs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1