Forest Taxation and REDD+: An Analysis of Potential Impacts in Cameroon, Ghana and Sierra Leone

S. Spratt, P. Kargbo, E. Marfo, Emmanuel Ngungoh, S. Ramcilovik-Suominen
{"title":"Forest Taxation and REDD+: An Analysis of Potential Impacts in Cameroon, Ghana and Sierra Leone","authors":"S. Spratt, P. Kargbo, E. Marfo, Emmanuel Ngungoh, S. Ramcilovik-Suominen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3149491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research explores the impacts that REDD+ could have on forest tax systems in three countries in sub-Saharan Africa, and considers how policy could be designed to increase the chances that these impacts are positive. To assess this, a methodological framework is identified and adapted. The framework has been used to explore how the implementation of a new policy regime affects the interests and thus behaviours of actors in related, existing regimes. The implementation of REDD+ in relation to forest tax systems seems well suited to such an approach. The countries concerned are Cameroon, Ghana and Sierra Leone. While they are at different stages of the process, a common finding is that long-term impacts will depend on the detail of REDD+ design and implementation, and that many of the most important decisions have yet to be taken. Domestically, the key outstanding questions are: the extent of stakeholder participation in the design and implementation of programmes; how equitably financial benefits are distributed; whether REDD+ coverage is restricted to forest areas that are already protected, or extended to areas currently used for commercial forestry; how monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) is implemented and whether this overlaps with forestry reporting practices; whether REDD+ is implemented nationally or locally; and whether existing or new channels are used.","PeriodicalId":197311,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Deforestation (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Deforestation (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3149491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This research explores the impacts that REDD+ could have on forest tax systems in three countries in sub-Saharan Africa, and considers how policy could be designed to increase the chances that these impacts are positive. To assess this, a methodological framework is identified and adapted. The framework has been used to explore how the implementation of a new policy regime affects the interests and thus behaviours of actors in related, existing regimes. The implementation of REDD+ in relation to forest tax systems seems well suited to such an approach. The countries concerned are Cameroon, Ghana and Sierra Leone. While they are at different stages of the process, a common finding is that long-term impacts will depend on the detail of REDD+ design and implementation, and that many of the most important decisions have yet to be taken. Domestically, the key outstanding questions are: the extent of stakeholder participation in the design and implementation of programmes; how equitably financial benefits are distributed; whether REDD+ coverage is restricted to forest areas that are already protected, or extended to areas currently used for commercial forestry; how monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) is implemented and whether this overlaps with forestry reporting practices; whether REDD+ is implemented nationally or locally; and whether existing or new channels are used.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
森林税收和REDD+:喀麦隆、加纳和塞拉利昂潜在影响分析
本研究探讨了REDD+可能对撒哈拉以南非洲三个国家的森林税收制度产生的影响,并考虑了如何设计政策以增加这些影响产生积极影响的可能性。为了评估这一点,确定并调整了一个方法框架。该框架已被用于探索新政策制度的实施如何影响相关现有制度中行为者的利益和行为。REDD+在森林税收制度方面的实施似乎非常适合这种方法。有关国家是喀麦隆、加纳和塞拉利昂。虽然它们处于过程的不同阶段,但一个共同的发现是,长期影响将取决于REDD+设计和实施的细节,而且许多最重要的决定尚未做出。在国内,关键的悬而未决的问题是:利益攸关方参与方案设计和实施的程度;经济利益分配的公平程度;REDD+的覆盖范围是否仅限于已经受到保护的林区,还是扩展到目前用于商业林业的地区;如何实施监测、报告和核查(MRV),以及这是否与林业报告做法重叠;REDD+是在全国还是在地方实施;以及是否使用现有的或新的渠道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Palm Oil and the Politics of Deforestation in Indonesia MINERAÇÃO NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA: aspectos da presença e avanço do capital na região (Mining in Brazilian Amazon: Aspects of Capital Presence and Advancement in the Region) Forest Taxation and REDD+: An Analysis of Potential Impacts in Cameroon, Ghana and Sierra Leone Pricing Forest Carbon: Implications of Asymmetry in Climate Policy Forest Conservation Policies and Rural Livelihood in North Sichuan Tibetan Areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1