Evaluation of Various Treatment Modalities in Treating Diarrhoea Patient’s at a Tertiary Care Centre: A Comparative Analysis

Sukhdev Choudhary
{"title":"Evaluation of Various Treatment Modalities in Treating Diarrhoea Patient’s at a Tertiary Care Centre: A Comparative Analysis","authors":"Sukhdev Choudhary","doi":"10.21276/ajmr.2019.8.4.sg1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Diarrhea is a common problem affecting up to 5% of the population at a given time. Patients vary in their definition of diarrhea, citing loose stool consistency, increased frequency, urgency of bowel movements, or incontinence as key symptoms. The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare various treatment modalities in treating diarrhoea patients at a tertiary care centre. Subjects and Methods: The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare various treatment modalities in treating 240 diarrhoea patients. All the patients were grouped into three study groups with 80 patients in each group: group 1- included patients who were given Metronidazole therapy, group 2- patients who were given Ofloxacin therapy, and group 3 – patients who were given Norfloxacin therapy. Stool samples were obtained from patients of all the study groups for assessing the effectiveness of treatment therapy. Only clinical success was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and level of significance was assessed using Chi- square test. Results: In our study total sample size was 240 in which 175 were males and 65 were females. In group 1 patients with 3 to 4 times stool per day were 29 and more than 4 times per day were 53 whereas in group 2 patients with 3 to 4 times stool per day were 34 and more than 4 times per day were 49 and in group 3 patients with 3 to 4 times stool per day was 31 and more than 4 times per day were 44. The clinical success of group 1 was 96% , group 2 was 93.97% and group 3 was 93.33%. Conclusion: Present study concluded that Metronidazole therapy had better clinical success than Ofloxacin therapy and Norfloxacin therapy.","PeriodicalId":407051,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21276/ajmr.2019.8.4.sg1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Diarrhea is a common problem affecting up to 5% of the population at a given time. Patients vary in their definition of diarrhea, citing loose stool consistency, increased frequency, urgency of bowel movements, or incontinence as key symptoms. The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare various treatment modalities in treating diarrhoea patients at a tertiary care centre. Subjects and Methods: The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare various treatment modalities in treating 240 diarrhoea patients. All the patients were grouped into three study groups with 80 patients in each group: group 1- included patients who were given Metronidazole therapy, group 2- patients who were given Ofloxacin therapy, and group 3 – patients who were given Norfloxacin therapy. Stool samples were obtained from patients of all the study groups for assessing the effectiveness of treatment therapy. Only clinical success was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and level of significance was assessed using Chi- square test. Results: In our study total sample size was 240 in which 175 were males and 65 were females. In group 1 patients with 3 to 4 times stool per day were 29 and more than 4 times per day were 53 whereas in group 2 patients with 3 to 4 times stool per day were 34 and more than 4 times per day were 49 and in group 3 patients with 3 to 4 times stool per day was 31 and more than 4 times per day were 44. The clinical success of group 1 was 96% , group 2 was 93.97% and group 3 was 93.33%. Conclusion: Present study concluded that Metronidazole therapy had better clinical success than Ofloxacin therapy and Norfloxacin therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价在三级保健中心治疗腹泻病人的各种治疗方式:比较分析
背景:腹泻是一种常见的问题,在特定的时间内影响到5%的人口。患者对腹泻的定义各不相同,主要症状包括大便疏松、频率增加、排便急促或尿失禁。本研究旨在评估和比较三级保健中心治疗腹泻患者的各种治疗方式。研究对象和方法:本研究对240例腹泻患者的不同治疗方式进行了评价和比较。将所有患者分为3组,每组80例患者:1组患者给予甲硝唑治疗,2组患者给予氧氟沙星治疗,3组患者给予诺氟沙星治疗。从所有研究组的患者中获取粪便样本以评估治疗的有效性。仅记录临床成功。采用社会科学软件21.0版统计软件包(SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA)进行统计分析,采用卡方检验评估显著性水平。结果:本研究总样本量为240例,其中男性175例,女性65例。1组每天大便3 ~ 4次者29例,每天大便4次以上者53例;2组每天大便3 ~ 4次者34例,每天大便4次以上者49例;3组每天大便3 ~ 4次者31例,每天大便4次以上者44例。1组临床成功率为96%,2组为93.97%,3组为93.33%。结论:甲硝唑治疗的临床疗效优于氧氟沙星和诺氟沙星治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outcome of Pregnancies with Fibroids and its Associated Complications: A Prospective Study Floor Level Activity as a Sign of Congruency and Containment in Perthes’ Disease Osteoid Osteoma of Cuboid Bone- A Rare Cause of Chronic Foot Pain in Childhood –A Case Report Evaluation of Clinical Profile of Bipolar and Unipolar Depression Patients- A Clinical Study Study of Influence of Vaginal Ph on the efficacy of Dinoprostone gel for Induction of Labor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1